Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Northwood schoolgirl 'beats' Stephen Hawking and Albert Einstein
Harrow Observer, UK ^ | Sep 13 2012 | Caitlin Black

Posted on 10/13/2012 2:57:36 PM PDT by James C. Bennett

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 last
To: Sherman Logan

You’re right. How come somebody hasn’t started a “wisdom” club?


81 posted on 10/13/2012 5:45:22 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

My experience is the higher the IQ the less stable, but that’s for very high IQ’s.


82 posted on 10/13/2012 5:46:00 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett

Is it genetic or environmental?


83 posted on 10/13/2012 5:46:40 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett

Dang! She beat me too.

84 posted on 10/13/2012 5:49:30 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

no “return trip” mentioned.

The ‘return trip’ mentioned was part of the comment I referred to. It wasn’t my post. I only copy and pasted his post and answered it.


85 posted on 10/13/2012 5:50:25 PM PDT by Joan Kerrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: All

My opinion, for whatever it is worth - (I could probably qualify for Mensa, but don’t get the point).

The question isn’t worth spending one minute of our precious time here on earth, for it offers no information about human talents unrelated to intelligence.

Only fools think IQ tests are a measure of their worth. God makes fools of these sad people.


86 posted on 10/13/2012 6:00:02 PM PDT by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana
The answer to the question is that it is not possible. See Page 2, problem 4
87 posted on 10/13/2012 6:02:20 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Jab him with a harpoon.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
1 mile * (1 hour / 15 miles)
+
1 mile * (1 hour / 45 miles)
=
time to travel 2 miles
--------- or ----------
1 mile * (3 hours/45 miles)
+
1 mile * (1 hour/45 miles)
=
4 hours miles/ 45 miles
-----------------------
2 miles = 4 hours / 45
= 2 miles * 45 / 4 hours
= 22.5 miles/hour
88 posted on 10/13/2012 6:04:52 PM PDT by BufordP (Chuck Norris doesn't check under the bed anymore. He wears Clint Eastwood pajamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
OK. 1.2 +4 = 5.2 minutes. Which means exactly squat, and has nothing to do with Average miles per hour.

Wrong-o, wrong-o.

The average speed for NASCAR drivers isn't calculated by averaging their lap speeds, but by calculating their average speed according to elapsed time over distance covered.

It has ever been thus...

89 posted on 10/13/2012 6:08:18 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA; Ignorance on parade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco
The answer to the question is that it is not possible. See Page 2, problem 4

Saying that it has to be instantaneous is the same as saying it is not possible.
90 posted on 10/13/2012 6:11:01 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("I love to watch you talk talk talk, but I hate what I hear you say."--Del Shannon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Joan Kerrey; UCANSEE2; Toddsterpatriot; Bobalu

See #87


91 posted on 10/13/2012 6:11:32 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Jab him with a harpoon.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
You’re right. How come somebody hasn’t started a “wisdom” club?

No one interested in joining would qualify.
92 posted on 10/13/2012 6:13:30 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("I love to watch you talk talk talk, but I hate what I hear you say."--Del Shannon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Joan Kerrey

“The car is still at the top of the hill.”

No. It is in Alpha Centauri and still decelerating.


93 posted on 10/13/2012 6:16:42 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett

Here is another of the questions Wertheimer sent to Einstein.
The answer is deceptively simple. hint..if you are doing a bunch of calculations you are going about it in the wrong way.

4.Amoeba Propagation An amoeba propagates by simple division; each split takes
3 minutes to complete. When such an amoeba is put into a glass container with a nutrient
fluid, the container is full of amoebas in one hour. How long would it take for the container
to be filled if we start with not one amoeba, but two?


94 posted on 10/13/2012 6:31:30 PM PDT by Bobalu (It is not obama we are fighting, it is the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu

57 minutes


95 posted on 10/13/2012 6:40:32 PM PDT by calljack (Sometimes your worst nightmare is just a start.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

its not asking for the average speed. its asking for the speed for the second half of the trip to be averaged with the first half of the trip to complete the trip at an average of 30 mph. An average of 30 mph means you you complete the ENTIRE trip in 4 minutes. it takes you 4 minutes to do the first half, so there is no time left to do the second part.


96 posted on 10/13/2012 6:45:47 PM PDT by calljack (Sometimes your worst nightmare is just a start.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: stubernx98
High IQ does not make you smart! Maybe a smart ass.

So that's my problem ;-)

97 posted on 10/13/2012 7:10:38 PM PDT by Fast Moving Angel (A moral wrong is not a civil right: No religious sanction of an irreligious act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: calljack

Oh, I get it. It’s a trick question. The ‘length’ is artificially divided in ‘half’, limiting the speed during that first half so that it takes at least 4 minutes.

Then both miles are lumped together and the time is used to calculate AVE MPH.

I understand that AVE MPH is based on distance per time, so I see how the 15 mph limit ensures that there is not a possible answer.

However, I don’t like rigged tests. SO.... here’s my answer (I have my own ‘tricks’)

Take the car to a Custom Auto shop and have nitrous installed. Don’t tell the guys who are timing you. Once you head off up the hill, engage the nitrous. This will give you plenty of speed to ensure you can go fast enough on the downhill side to make it there in four minutes.


98 posted on 10/13/2012 7:13:58 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 ( If you think I'm crazy, just wait until you talk to my invisible friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett; allmendream
Thank you for the post. I hardly know what to say about it. Yes indeed that it is good for her. Hopefully the British press will respect this young woman and she may fulfill what ever promise she has.

Now to it. I hope be forgiven going off topic. It was the redoubtable Potter St Elementary School, Northwood Hills, where in 1946, 14 year olds were pushed out into the world. I was one of them. For it was work, work and more work. Listening to old men moaning about things had changed. How well did I come to know Northwood. We took our place in the hard scrabble post war years. Luckier than our predecessors in the horible 1930's. Elton John got his start at the Northwood Hotel, but was from nearby Pinner.

Another ramble, but enough said by me. Good luck to the "young uns".

99 posted on 10/13/2012 7:30:05 PM PDT by Peter Libra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
The answer is: "speed" is not velocity, NOR was the problem framed in terms of speed; it was framed, very specifically (with a bit of deliberate obfuscation, I grant you) as a conditional problem in computing necessary velocity.

Your riddle does not resemble the problem posed at all: the problem stipulates that the vehicle in question has already traveled 1 mile, while your riddle is completely a priori.

Tch, tch. Any time someone speaks of velocity, time is DISTINCTLY part of the issue. Re-take Physics 101, wherein you will be sharply disabused of any notion to the contrary.

100 posted on 10/13/2012 8:17:58 PM PDT by SAJ (What is the next tagline some overweening mod will censor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson