No it wasn’t. This is a CIA FUBAR. It’s not about suppressing freedoms - although that would be a side bonus.
The CIA will use anyone and/or anything to achieve their goals.
As I have mentioned, in the past they had a porn film made by A List Hollywood to overthrow a dictator. It’s possible they were behind the latest film to create unrest, to create a cover, or other insidious goals.
Not to suppress freedoms - but for a larger international goal.
Yes,the CIA.
However, the reason team Obama went along with the film story was not to cover for the cia but to use it for their own agenda.
Otherwise, all team Obama would have done from the start is say it was being investigated and its being looked into.
Maybe that perp walk was not a perp walk. Perhaps it was to get him in protective custody and/or to convince him not to disclose any prior contact he may have with our agencies.
That video could very well have been part of some sort of operation in Egypt. What no one counted on was the attack in Benghazi which could have been the luck of the draw as far as timing goes or planned by someone who knew about an operation in Egypt.
It might explain why Patraeus was pushing the video excuse. The events in Egypt are unrelated. But we could have been caught with our pants down in Benghazi because of something bigger we had going on in Egypt.
(Sorry if long-winded and wandering—grandkids left but not before making Grandma sick)