1 posted on
10/10/2012 10:41:02 AM PDT by
ShadowAce
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: ShadowAce
No the speed of dark is much faster
2 posted on
10/10/2012 10:42:06 AM PDT by
al baby
(“If Barack Obama has a Harvard law degree, he didn’t earn that. Somebody else made that happen.”)
To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Salo; JosephW; Only1choice____Freedom; amigatec; stylin_geek; ...
3 posted on
10/10/2012 10:42:06 AM PDT by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: ShadowAce
5 posted on
10/10/2012 10:44:05 AM PDT by
Democrat_media
(limit government to 5000 words of laws. Quantify limited government)
To: ShadowAce
No Ludacris speed is much faster.
6 posted on
10/10/2012 10:44:11 AM PDT by
bmwcyle
(Corollary - Electing the same person over and over and expecting a different outcome is insanity)
To: ShadowAce
"Activate Light Speed"
"No, Light Speed's too slow"
"Light Speed too slow!?!?"
"Yes we're gonna have to go right to...LUDICROUS SPEED!!!"
8 posted on
10/10/2012 10:45:50 AM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(Big Bird is a brood parasite: laid in our nest 43 years ago and we are still feeding him.)
To: ShadowAce
This is another one of those “mathematics predicts” papers. But without a valid way to test the math in the real world, the prediction is worthless.
Sort of like me saying this: A horse has four legs. Suppose a hour could have 20 more legs. Then the math predicts the possibility of a 24-leg horse. Of course, I offer no way to test this possibility, but you can't argue with the math: 4 + 20 = 24.
To: ShadowAce
11 posted on
10/10/2012 10:54:29 AM PDT by
mikrofon
(Celeritas)
To: ShadowAce
Again, a scientist thinking that since an equation comes out right, it must faithfully describe the real world.
12 posted on
10/10/2012 10:55:26 AM PDT by
I want the USA back
(Liberalism is a malfunction of the brain.)
To: ShadowAce
I hate Lightspeed.
Their Rocket spam/email/web filter sucks on ice...
13 posted on
10/10/2012 10:58:14 AM PDT by
Dead Corpse
(I will not comply.)
To: ShadowAce; SunkenCiv
THANKS, for the thread / post.
science ping
14 posted on
10/10/2012 10:58:35 AM PDT by
skinkinthegrass
(WA DC E$tabli$hment; DNC/RNC/Unionists...Brazilian saying: "$@me Old $hit; w/ different flie$" :^)
To: KevinDavis
aviation ping
15 posted on
10/10/2012 11:00:37 AM PDT by
skinkinthegrass
(WA DC E$tabli$hment; DNC/RNC/Unionists...Brazilian saying: "$@me Old $hit; w/ different flie$" :^)
To: ShadowAce
Well, that part about “infinite mass” is a limit. Unless you want to reverse the Big Bang, or whatever.
16 posted on
10/10/2012 11:01:15 AM PDT by
Little Ray
(AGAINST Obama in the General.)
To: ShadowAce
Speed only has meaning in a relativistic measurement. It must be measured from some other object (car versus road is a different speed than car versus the sun).
Object A travels the speed of light towards object B. At the same time object C travels the speed of light in the opposite direction away from B, how fast is object C moving in relation to object A?
17 posted on
10/10/2012 11:01:22 AM PDT by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: ShadowAce
If there is Dark Matter, maybe there are Dark Photons?
Speed of light. Speed of Dark.
19 posted on
10/10/2012 11:02:05 AM PDT by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: EveningStar; KevinDavis
aviation ping
sorry, KD
20 posted on
10/10/2012 11:03:59 AM PDT by
skinkinthegrass
(WA DC E$tabli$hment; DNC/RNC/Unionists...Brazilian saying: "$@me Old $hit; w/ different flie$" :^)
To: ShadowAce
There are two reining factors in the belief that the speed of light is an absolute: 1) the state of physics and what we know/understand about friction, gravity and the way that light travels, and 2) the ability to detect and measure anything faster.
Without knowing specifically what they are seeking to measure, it is difficult for physicists to try to detect (much less develop) an instrument that can measure something travelling at greater than the speed of light.
The speed of light is the current state of technology. As soon as we discover dilithium crystals and develop warp engines, the speed of light will be relegated to travel in the slow lane!
(Ok, I’m having a little fun and made that last paragraph up!)
25 posted on
10/10/2012 11:20:16 AM PDT by
DustyMoment
(Congress - another name for white collar criminals!!)
To: ShadowAce; 04-Bravo; 1FASTGLOCK45; 1stFreedom; 2ndDivisionVet; 60Gunner; 6AL-4V; A.A. Cunningham; ..
Aviation and Aerospace ping
Please ping me to aviation and aerospace articles. Thank you.
If you want added to or removed from this ping list, please contact EveningStar or Paleo Conservative.
To: ShadowAce
Is lightspeed really a limit? No, apparently not.
In this video, Bob compares what he does to "the speed of light":
Fastest Gunman on the Planet
To: ShadowAce
33 posted on
10/10/2012 11:40:04 AM PDT by
Hokestuk
To: ShadowAce
34 posted on
10/10/2012 11:45:59 AM PDT by
JRios1968
(I'm guttery and trashy, with a hint of lemon. - Laz)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
