Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Something important is happening in Massachusetts: Liberals face pushback they never anticipated.
American Thinker ^ | 10/09/2012 | Thomas Lifson

Posted on 10/09/2012 11:14:33 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

The Senate race between Scott Brown and Elizabeth Warren is being shaped by the efforts of a blogger, Professor William Jacobson, of Legal Insurrection. This very high profile race reveals how important the internet has become to political discourse.

Once upon a time, only newspapers could launch inquiries and crusades that determined the fate of powerful politicians, but now a single, intelligent, skilled, and determined individual like Jacobson can take on the might of the liberal establishment in Massachusetts, arguably the state most dominated by the academic and machine Democrat factions of the left, and give them a serious fight.

As most readers of AT know, Legal Insurrection has been pressing the inquiry into Elizabeth Warren's claims of Native American ancestry, which preceded her leap into the major leagues of American legal education. More recently, Jacobson discovered that when she moved to Massachusetts to join the Harvard faculty, Warren never bothered to acquire a license to practice law. Many law professors, Warren included, have a lucrative side business as consultants, often writing briefs.

What happened next was a classic left wing move: generation of a meme that would enable the media establishment to ignore the scandal as discredited. For instance, in 1992, when Bill Clinton's former mistress Gennifer Flowers provided the tapes of Bill Clinton's phone calls to her, the campaign hired LA private eye (and subsequent guest of the Federal Bureau of Prisons) Anthony Pellicano to declare the tapes "doctored." He was cited as an "expert" by the media, which then refused to even consider the philandering behavior which was to prove so imporant to his second term in office.

In Warren's legal license case, an even more devious approach was taken.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: massachusetts

1 posted on 10/09/2012 11:14:43 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I think everyone is forgetting that Romney was ELECTED Governor....in Kennedy territory!!!


2 posted on 10/09/2012 11:16:27 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (r)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Who reads newspapers anymore?

The liberals DESTROYED that media. No one believes what they print and so less and less people read them.

And it will never come back.


3 posted on 10/09/2012 11:19:33 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bump


4 posted on 10/09/2012 11:22:27 AM PDT by mom4melody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Still, there is something to be said for Elizabeth Warren. In America, you can be whatever you want to be. And Elizabeth Warren pushes the envelope by being whatever you want to say you are. Want to be an American Indian? Just say you are one. You want to practice law in another state without a license? Just say you have one. She proves you can be a huckster and a success in a Liberal state. Look at Obama. He wants to be an egghead, and he only has to say he is one. No grades, no papers, no actual oratory, or coherence is needed. Just say you are a genius and it works for Liberals.


5 posted on 10/09/2012 11:43:00 AM PDT by elhombrelibre ("I'd rather be ruled by the Tea Party than the Democratic Party." Norman Podhoretz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
Actually there were TWO media in tight competition for the exact same advertising dollars. One of them was known as newspapers and magazines, the other was called THE YELLOW PAGES.

Although the yellow pages are still produced the greater part of their advertisers moved to the Internet as fast as they could. You could see that happening in 1996!

Most newspapers and magazines weren't satisfied with the money they had and demanded and got a government subsidy from the federal government for editorial matter ~ which could be sent cheaper than the advertising content. A complete science grew up around how that content might be measured with ever greater precision.

Worse, newspaper and magazine publishers were so greedy they held to this theory that it was better to force the customer to read through the entire periodical than to give him a useful index! If the post office hadn't required indices/tables of contents with page numbers the publishers would have never done it.

The Yellow Pages were highly structured with both logical contents sections, complete indices and page numbers fore, aft, and in between sometimes top and bottom.

The methods and practices of the publishers when it came to filling the 'news hole' are something I'll never miss ~

6 posted on 10/09/2012 11:43:32 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Brown +4 in today’s poll.


7 posted on 10/09/2012 11:48:32 AM PDT by LongWayHome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

You can be what you want to be until it comes to checking boxes on state and Federal forms, that is.


8 posted on 10/09/2012 11:56:40 AM PDT by Little Ray (AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

I have to respectfully disagree with you on this point.

If liberal opinion killed newspapers, you would have to explain how legions of liberal broadcasters stay on the air.

Liberals have made a mucked-up mess of much of our society, but the decline of newspapers is truly just a result of technology.

In delivering news as it happens, they simply can’t compete with TV and the internet.

In advertising, which is where newspapers make their money, they can’t compete with the internet. Who is going to buy a print ad when they can advertise for free through e-mail and craiglist?

Newspapers are shrinking as did the carriage trade, saddlery, carbon paper, and now the post office. It’s just a sign of the times.


9 posted on 10/09/2012 12:12:52 PM PDT by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I don’t know. A newspaper is still a pretty efficient way of delivering information. If you really want to know about a story, the 30 seconds they cover it on tv is not much. I dropped our little newspaper because it was blatantly pro-Democrat. They could get me back tomorrow if they’d just get out of supporting the Democrats.


10 posted on 10/09/2012 2:37:26 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

Even the used cars ads in the paper are more honest than the editors.


11 posted on 10/09/2012 4:29:18 PM PDT by ops33 (Senior Master Sergeant, USAF (Retired))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
Who reads newspapers anymore? The liberals DESTROYED that media. No one believes what they print and so less and less people read them. And it will never come back.

You are right on the mark.

12 posted on 10/09/2012 4:51:20 PM PDT by T Ruth (Islam shall be defeated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah
If liberal opinion killed newspapers, you would have to explain how legions of liberal broadcasters stay on the air.

It's late in the day. thanks for the softball question. Simple answer, subsidy.

Rich people interested in steering public opinion buy interests in news media. They are not in it for the money earned by the media, often it's a loss. They are in it for the money and power they garner by swaying public opinion. Example: wealthy oil rich cartel Arabs would prefer Americans not exploit American oil reserves. they would like to encourage Americans to waste money on unproductive wind and solar technologies while they pursue jacking up the price of oil.

The media is corrupt.

13 posted on 10/09/2012 8:40:12 PM PDT by LoneRangerMassachusetts (The meek shall not inherit the Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah
If liberal opinion killed newspapers, you would have to explain how legions of liberal broadcasters stay on the air.

It's late in the day. thanks for the softball question. Simple answer, subsidy.

Rich people interested in steering public opinion buy interests in news media. They are not in it for the money earned by the media, often it's a loss. They are in it for the money and power they garner by swaying public opinion. Example: wealthy oil rich cartel Arabs would prefer Americans not exploit American oil reserves. they would like to encourage Americans to waste money on unproductive wind and solar technologies while they pursue jacking up the price of oil.

The media is corrupt.

14 posted on 10/09/2012 8:40:12 PM PDT by LoneRangerMassachusetts (The meek shall not inherit the Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson