Posted on 10/05/2012 6:02:49 PM PDT by ReformationFan
Redefining marriage won't satisfy gay rights activists; they want to redefine reality.
Segregating genders in marriage to suit the sexual attractions of less than 2% of the population isn't enough. This woman with same-sex attraction wants scientists to "try harder" and give "priority" to making it possible for two women to procreate. Michelle Cheever says: "I want to have babies the way straight people do."
Huffington Post:
What I mean is that I want the ease, the convenience, the — dare I say it — naturalness that straight people have when starting a family. I want both the simple beauty of two people loving each other so much that they'd like to see more of the other in the world, and I want that simple beauty to be translated into scientific terms of fairness: chromosomes and DNA given in equal amounts from two parents.
The attitude I have always taken to having a baby with another woman has been this: "It's not fair! It's so hard! Why me?"
I am a total brat about what I consider a biological injustice. . .
Why can't my girlfriend and I have a baby that shares our DNA? Why can't an egg from each of us be scrambled up and sprinkled with sperm? It seems so easy! Try harder scientists! Make this a priority.
Instead of urging scientists to "try harder," Cheever might as well demand that science try harder.
"Biological injustice"? What's next — are they going to sue their bodies for justice?
The problem with same-sex marriage is not that so-called anti-gay bigots oppose it. The challenge that gender segregationists face is their own biology, not hatred. SSM activists battle nature, not just culture. The problem is reality, not politics.
(Excerpt) Read more at renewamerica.com ...
Can’t have everything, Michelle.
This is just bizarre.
Amen.
Sounds like the “logic” one would hear at the typical Democratic party meetings.
She is literally declaring biology to be unfair. It's reality.
I don't get it - they don't want to be "straight" - have a relationship with the opposite sex - but then are adamant they want to have the same results as only that kind of a relationship can naturally bring them. Seems rather self-contradicting - essentially that she wants an opposite sex relationship with someone of the same sex - that should be a logical clue that is not the ideal kind of a relationship. It also seems lost on her that if scientists come up with some way to manipulate such a thing into being, that that it is not "natural" by any shape, manner, or form.
Sounds like a Hollywood movies
“dare I say it — naturalness that straight people have when starting a family”
No, you dare not say it, because you are rebelling against God the Creator. This is why homosexuality is such a terrible sin. It is a rejection of the sovereignty of God.
Here’s a clue—Stop being Gay! Its not permanent for all Gays—some can swing back to a normal sex life? Maybe as many as 80%—so I have read—can be changed back for at least a time. Gay men can marry gay women-—and even if the sex isn’t as rewarding—they can re-produce? In raising children find a normalcy unknown to the bath house culture? Just saying.
She’s not bad looking in a kinky, evil kind of way,.
But, she’s still...guilty!
(Thanks for the photo.)
The title is "Bizarro World".
Nature is inherently discriminatory!
As our President lectures: Everyone deserves a "Fair Shot".
Is it fair that a queer man can't be a real woman?
Is it fair that a lesbian can't be a real man?
How can everyone be considered equal if a woman can't have the same tools as a man and a man can't have the same equipmant as a woman?
It's just not democratic!
/s
‘She is literally declaring biology to be unfair. It’s reality.’
Essentially it boils down to this: feminism, abortion and homosexuality are all wars on reality and the natural family as created by God. I’m surprised she hasn’t complained it’s “unfair” that men can’t get pregnant.
‘I don’t get it - they don’t want to be “straight” - have a relationship with the opposite sex - but then are adamant they want to have the same results as only that kind of a relationship can naturally bring them. Seems rather self-contradicting - essentially that she wants an opposite sex relationship with someone of the same sex - that should be a logical clue that is not the ideal kind of a relationship. It also seems lost on her that if scientists come up with some way to manipulate such a thing into being, that that it is not “natural” by any shape, manner, or form.’
Exactly but modern liberalism is indeed a mental disorder:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEwVcsHnf3o
The more psychologically sick one is, the more a “victim” he is and the greater his “need” for a huge all powerful government to make him “happy”.* And Democratic politicians solidify their state power over all of us via the mentally insane.
*He in this sentence is being used in the generic sense.
” an item called “Vegetarian Breast.””
Probably a spin-off of Buddhist fare. It gives you something you can cook “in the manner of” chicken breast. The Buddhists have a million dishes like that. Many of them very delicious!
[ Angry, tormented souls. All they want is to be like us, and they’re not, and never will be, and can’t get over it. ]
The alternative view is...
They are like us don’t want to be, but always will be, and hate the thought of being NORMAL..
Thats why I call them Normal-phobics..
Men are men, women are women, even if they deny it..
Stupid and crazy will go away when the media stops paying attention to them. It is the media that gives these loonies a platform which I suspect encourages others who are not too balanced and looking for something that is lacking in their lives to go over to the gay side. There seems to be a lot more craziness going on now, it seems that sometimes craziness can be catchy.
Let’s hope that the 98% figure it out before it is too late.
This may be the next *civil rights movement*. Let’s all get our candles and start marching.
The Chardonnay—hilarious!!
Yeah, stop the hormone treatments for a few months and see what happens.
You know, this rejection of reality probably has a lot to do with all of the drug usage today. Rejecting reality can effect different people in different ways.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.