Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Real Barack Obama
Townhall.com ^ | October 4, 2012 | Ben Shapiro

Posted on 10/04/2012 11:55:41 AM PDT by Kaslin

A recent poll shows that 85 percent of middle-class Americans believe they're worse off now than they were 10 years ago. Yet shockingly, just 34 percent of those people blame Barack Obama. More Americans blame Congress (62 percent), banks (54 percent), corporations (47 percent), former President George W. Bush (44 percent) and foreign competition (39 percent).

Why the disconnect?

These folks aren't entirely wrong. Congress did nothing about an out-of-control Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for a decade, and allowed the Federal Reserve to inflate the currency all the while. Banks played along with the regulatory regime in order to make short-term profits. President George W. Bush didn't do enough to free the real estate market from the shackles of liberal central planning.

But there's something else at play here: Americans are loath to believe that Barack Obama is a bad guy.

All of these other entities have a bad reputation. Congress has long been a repository for American unhappiness; the last time Congress was popular, it didn't exist. Banks have never enjoyed a warm and cozy reputation. George W. Bush was perhaps the least popular two-term president in modern history.

But Barack Obama still enjoys the goodwill of the American people. In large part, that's because he's personally popular. And he's personally popular because the American people still see in him, after four years of failure, as the answer to the most burning question in American history: can we bridge our racial gaps? The fact is this: Obama is not personally likeable. He is alternatively arrogant and smug, smarmy and nasty. He is not well liked on the Hill. Every story about his personal interactions has him lording over other participants.

And yet he's liked by the American people.

Obama has placed himself in perfect political position: he spent the 2008 campaign convincing the American people that he's a racial unifier rather than a divider, without any evidence to prove it. Now, the American people don't want to hear anything to the contrary. Whether it's a tape of Obama praising anti-Semitic America-hater Rev. Jeremiah Wright or a tape of him praising anti-Semitic America-hater Professor Derrick Bell, whether it's hanging with Palestinian terrorist supporter Rashid Khalidi or hiring Marxist Van Jones for the White House, none of it seems to matter.

Obama has spent his career dividing himself for different audiences. When he's talking to Hampton University in 2007, he puts on dialect he obviously believes lends him black authenticity, and proceeds to don the mantle of Kanye West, complaining about the racism of the federal government on Hurricane Katrina. When he's talking to the American public, he dumps the accent and talks about how we're all members of a great nation, regardless of race.

So which one is Obama?

His policies look a lot more like the radical than they do like the racial unifier. He said in his Hampton University speech that he wanted to spend money on the inner cities rather than the suburbs, largely for racial reasons; that's precisely what he's planning to do in his second term: work with radical community organizer Mike Kruglik to push "regional tax-based sharing," which would bleed the suburbs dry in favor of the inner cities. In his early days in Chicago, Obama focused largely on mobilizing the black vote to concentrate "black power" (his phrase); today, he opposes all efforts to crack down on voter ID fraud for the same reason. There's a reason that the Obama Justice Department has no interest in pursuing the New Black Panthers for voter intimidation. And it doesn't have to do with their kind and gentle interpersonal tactics.

Barack Obama remains well liked because Americans want to like him. They're willfully blinding themselves to the truer Obama, the more radical Obama. And that's just the way he likes it.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012election; likability; obama; polls

1 posted on 10/04/2012 11:55:54 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Why the disconnect?

Why the disconnect? (Am I repeating m'self? Fear of being labeled "RACIST", the Kumbaya scare issue of the Left and Right in the crazy country.

2 posted on 10/04/2012 11:58:59 AM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

And then, Barack Hussein Obama met in a debate with Mitt Romney.

Maybe this was a much bigger game-changer than anybody has yet recognized. The food for thought that was thrown out there last night is still in the process of being digested.

For many people, this is their very first look at the REAL Barack and the REAL Mitt Romney. The oral exam showed who was prepared and who was the one phoning it in.

Can anybody say, “Jump the shark”? Because that may what happened last night.


3 posted on 10/04/2012 12:04:07 PM PDT by alloysteel ("You have attributed conditions to villainy that simply result from stupidity".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

I believe it was and some definitely jumped the shark


4 posted on 10/04/2012 12:09:15 PM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

Obama is an average intellect, average speaker, with below-average experience and knowledge. He has the additional burden and blindness of carrying leftist cliches and fantasies around with him, regardless of how reality proves him wrong again and again.

It creates a lot of cognitive dissonance and confusion for Obama in his own mind.

America was duped into thinking otherwise in 2008, but the truth is coming out.


5 posted on 10/04/2012 12:12:03 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Spinning platitudes while the people watch.

The people watch the spinning platitudes and are mesmerized by the show.

Obama says just enough to keep people watching the show.

And, he doesn't have to say very much because he knows that as long as he keeps people's minds focused on the platitudes, the little he does say will be finished by the people themselves.

He talks about affordable healthcare and by just mentioning the topic you are given permission to assume that he means that it will be free for you.

He must have left his sticks back in Las Vegas.

Poor baby.

6 posted on 10/04/2012 12:17:20 PM PDT by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

Very well stated. Yes, the leftist cliches which only intellectuals and academics cheering on the sidelines can continue to believe. Gunther Grass, Gabriel Garcia Marquez come to mind. The leaders on the other hand at some point stop believing them (example: Mikhail Gorbachov), and just go on for a ride, repeating the nonsense like Fidel Castro has been doing. Obama, Axelrod, Ayers appear to be true believers to the end. Even Chairman Bob Avakian appears to have “grown” his views a bit. Not Obama.


7 posted on 10/04/2012 12:33:02 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson