Skip to comments.
China: Big U.S. Fleet Nears Disputed Islands, But What For?
Time ^
| September 30, 2012
| Kirk Spitzer
Posted on 10/02/2012 12:22:24 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster; Jeff Head; Tainan; hedgetrimmer; Unam Sanctam; taxesareforever; Avenger; ...
2
posted on
10/02/2012 12:25:24 PM PDT
by
TigerLikesRooster
(The way to crush the bourgeois is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Are they allowed to have armed weapons? Or are they being sent for target practice?
Is Hussein posturing?
3
posted on
10/02/2012 12:26:14 PM PDT
by
stboz
To: TigerLikesRooster
yeah, just a coincidence...
4
posted on
10/02/2012 12:31:05 PM PDT
by
stuartcr
("When silence speaks, it speaks only to those that have already decided what they want to hear.")
To: TigerLikesRooster
It is like the coach showing up nearby when two kids known to be at odds begin to act up on the playground. That old technique tends to improve behavior without even having to make any sort of comment or warning.
To: TigerLikesRooster
Hussein just wants to play “Yo momma is” with the chinese..
But the Japs may get offended not understanding “the game”..
6
posted on
10/02/2012 12:41:24 PM PDT
by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Good question. 0% of Americans would countenance having two battle groups at serious risk from China so that Japan’s rights to desolate rocks in the Pacific are upheld.
7
posted on
10/02/2012 12:43:36 PM PDT
by
KantianBurke
(Where was the Tea Party when Dubya was spending like a drunken sailor?)
To: TigerLikesRooster
I wonder if a Chinese sub will pop-up beside one of our carriers...
To: TigerLikesRooster
Well, I believe that by treaty were are still responsible for Japan's defense and the Islands are Japanese territory which China has been making some provocative moves toward. I'm just surprised that Obama would actually allow anything that might be viewed as aggressive toward China, (of course with the election coming up, it might just be a diversion so he appears tough, lets just hope he doesn't start World War III in the process...)
9
posted on
10/02/2012 12:44:30 PM PDT
by
apillar
To: TigerLikesRooster
China: Big U.S. Fleet Nears Disputed Islands, But What For?How about because Japan is our ally and Communist China is not?
10
posted on
10/02/2012 12:45:48 PM PDT
by
oneolcop
(Lead, Follow or Get the Hell Out of the Way!)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Because this is chess, not checkers.
If the flag goes up in the Middle East and we engage Iran, China strolls on over and takes these islands knowing we wont open another front (even for the Japanese).
11
posted on
10/02/2012 1:00:58 PM PDT
by
Daus
To: KantianBurke
Desolate rocks...and the oil and gas underneath
12
posted on
10/02/2012 1:05:48 PM PDT
by
stuartcr
("When silence speaks, it speaks only to those that have already decided what they want to hear.")
To: stuartcr
We have plenty of both in this country and from Canada. If Japan wants it, let them foot the bill.
13
posted on
10/02/2012 1:09:28 PM PDT
by
KantianBurke
(Where was the Tea Party when Dubya was spending like a drunken sailor?)
To: KantianBurke
They are. You don’t think we provide our military to them for free, do you?
14
posted on
10/02/2012 1:21:43 PM PDT
by
stuartcr
("When silence speaks, it speaks only to those that have already decided what they want to hear.")
To: TigerLikesRooster
"It's the white man's burden, Lloyd. The white man's burden."
15
posted on
10/02/2012 1:21:57 PM PDT
by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: All armed conservatives)
To: TigerLikesRooster
.
We’re there to support the #1 and #2 funders of our welfare programs debts.
One battle group will fight for the Chinese, the other for the Japanese...
16
posted on
10/02/2012 1:32:30 PM PDT
by
mrsmith
(Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
To: oneolcop
Silly you. You got that backwards ... it’s 0bamaland, remember!
17
posted on
10/02/2012 1:43:53 PM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(You didn't build that. The private sector is doing fine. We tried our plan and it worked.)
To: Daus
18
posted on
10/02/2012 1:51:51 PM PDT
by
traumer
To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; Bikkuri; Lanimal; thewitz2; lefty-lie-spy; wood35; sushiman; ...
Nihon Pingu!!!
How is this all playing out in Japan?
Is Obama ready to shove the Chinese around? LOL.
19
posted on
10/02/2012 2:16:46 PM PDT
by
Candor7
(Obama fascism article: http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Senkaku islands? China already recently took the Paracels and the Spratlys with the major media purposely ignoring those moves. China now owns the ocean between the Philippines and Vietnam. It’s not all about commodities. China is wanting ocean routes and a consolidation of all people related by genetics/history/heritage into China first. Then, the world.
IMO, the big war is far more probable than most people realize. Nuke exchanges will soon be far more likely than in the past, too (see the SCO’s pit bulls: Iran, Syria, Sudan, all).
20
posted on
10/02/2012 2:24:18 PM PDT
by
familyop
("Wanna cigarette? You're never too young to start." --Deacon, "Waterworld")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
