To: TigerLikesRooster; Jeff Head; Tainan; hedgetrimmer; Unam Sanctam; taxesareforever; Avenger; ...
2 posted on
10/02/2012 12:25:24 PM PDT by
TigerLikesRooster
(The way to crush the bourgeois is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Are they allowed to have armed weapons? Or are they being sent for target practice?
Is Hussein posturing?
3 posted on
10/02/2012 12:26:14 PM PDT by
stboz
To: TigerLikesRooster
yeah, just a coincidence...
4 posted on
10/02/2012 12:31:05 PM PDT by
stuartcr
("When silence speaks, it speaks only to those that have already decided what they want to hear.")
To: TigerLikesRooster
It is like the coach showing up nearby when two kids known to be at odds begin to act up on the playground. That old technique tends to improve behavior without even having to make any sort of comment or warning.
To: TigerLikesRooster
Hussein just wants to play “Yo momma is” with the chinese..
But the Japs may get offended not understanding “the game”..
6 posted on
10/02/2012 12:41:24 PM PDT by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Good question. 0% of Americans would countenance having two battle groups at serious risk from China so that Japan’s rights to desolate rocks in the Pacific are upheld.
7 posted on
10/02/2012 12:43:36 PM PDT by
KantianBurke
(Where was the Tea Party when Dubya was spending like a drunken sailor?)
To: TigerLikesRooster
I wonder if a Chinese sub will pop-up beside one of our carriers...
To: TigerLikesRooster
Well, I believe that by treaty were are still responsible for Japan's defense and the Islands are Japanese territory which China has been making some provocative moves toward. I'm just surprised that Obama would actually allow anything that might be viewed as aggressive toward China, (of course with the election coming up, it might just be a diversion so he appears tough, lets just hope he doesn't start World War III in the process...)
9 posted on
10/02/2012 12:44:30 PM PDT by
apillar
To: TigerLikesRooster
Because this is chess, not checkers.
If the flag goes up in the Middle East and we engage Iran, China strolls on over and takes these islands knowing we wont open another front (even for the Japanese).
11 posted on
10/02/2012 1:00:58 PM PDT by
Daus
To: TigerLikesRooster
"It's the white man's burden, Lloyd. The white man's burden."
15 posted on
10/02/2012 1:21:57 PM PDT by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: All armed conservatives)
To: TigerLikesRooster
.
We’re there to support the #1 and #2 funders of our welfare programs debts.
One battle group will fight for the Chinese, the other for the Japanese...
16 posted on
10/02/2012 1:32:30 PM PDT by
mrsmith
(Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; Bikkuri; Lanimal; thewitz2; lefty-lie-spy; wood35; sushiman; ...
Nihon Pingu!!!
How is this all playing out in Japan?
Is Obama ready to shove the Chinese around? LOL.
19 posted on
10/02/2012 2:16:46 PM PDT by
Candor7
(Obama fascism article: http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Senkaku islands? China already recently took the Paracels and the Spratlys with the major media purposely ignoring those moves. China now owns the ocean between the Philippines and Vietnam. It’s not all about commodities. China is wanting ocean routes and a consolidation of all people related by genetics/history/heritage into China first. Then, the world.
IMO, the big war is far more probable than most people realize. Nuke exchanges will soon be far more likely than in the past, too (see the SCO’s pit bulls: Iran, Syria, Sudan, all).
20 posted on
10/02/2012 2:24:18 PM PDT by
familyop
("Wanna cigarette? You're never too young to start." --Deacon, "Waterworld")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
