Posted on 09/21/2012 9:55:13 AM PDT by robowombat
Obama, Homosexuality And The Middle East Posted on 21 September 2012.
The Arab media reported that Obamas Libyan Ambassador Christopher Stevens was gang-raped and his body put on display after heathen Muslims murdered him. With the apparent exception of Obama, who claims the embassy attack was just a spontaneous incident and Hillary Clinton, who has been glaringly absent thus far, America is angered and appalled at the Muslim barbarism.
As barbaric and reprehensible as the behavior of those Muslims was, my observation is that they were simply behaving in kind with their depraved so-called prophet. The admin for the website Logans Warning, detailed Mohammads crazed debauchery in a December 6, 2011 article titled Mohammad The Poisoned Mind of Prophet Pervert Penetrates America. The article meticulously details what those willing to tell the truth about Islam have argued pursuant to the historical record: Even after marrying a child [i.e., a six-year old who was still playing with dolls and with whom he had sex with starting when she was nine-years old], and marrying his daughter-in-law, Prophet Pervert was still not satisfied. So in his attempt to fulfill his sexual addiction he raped sex slaves. His insane perversions are not yet finished. Not only did Mohammad ok the rape of sex slaves, he also encouraged his cronies to impregnate them.
There is documented historical evidence he allowed and some argue even encouraged sodomy. So with those historical perversions in mind, why should we be surprised at the brutal rape and sodomizing before and perhaps even after Stevens murder? Kyle Rogers of Examiner.com reported that: According to leading Arab media outlets Stevens murder was more horrible than reported by U.S. media. The Arab media reports that Stevens was beaten, gang raped, killed, and then his body was publicly displayed in a manner similar to Gaddafi. Does that sound like a kind, warm-spirited religion to you? I understand that what I point out is sickeningly grotesque but Im only sharing the truth about these caricatures of human life. Islam attempts to hide behind a phony piety but in fact it is nothing more than a Erebusic cult based upon the teachings of a mad-man.
Which brings me to this question. Why are appeasers like Obama and Clinton so quick to apologize to Muslims? Did America or the Axis powers apologize to the Nazis for condemning the dictates of their evil? Were the Nazi faithful looked upon differently than Hitler or his generals? Are Nazis readily accepted as respected and admired even today? Have Muslims apologized to us or other nations who have suffered unprovoked loss of life by the hands of Islamists?
Are the Ku Klux Klan and Aryan supremacist groups viewed as religious groups with rogue members who misinterpret the truth of what they are about? Applying the apologetic-logic that Obama and Hillary were so quick to display, should we also apologize to the KKK, supremacist groups and Nazisand allow them the benefit of claiming they murdered Jews, blacks, and Catholics because said groups insulted them? Bill Clintons deep and abiding concern for the Marxist terror group FALN which led to his pardoning their members for their terrorist crimes, notwithstanding.
Why is it that Muslims are the only group that sanctions terror and believes any insult, real or perceived of their lecherous, deviant, so-called prophet is an excuse for murder and mayhem? And while that question is being pondered answer me this. There is a twist here that also needs investigative consideration. The Examiner.com has reported that Hillary Clinton has been spending U.S. taxpayers dollars to fund homosexual pride events in foreign countries. Her actions have prompted backlashes against the U.S. in Italy, Russia, Pakistan, and other nations. Last year, Barack Obama made it official U.S. policy to fund homosexual rights groups overseas with U.S. tax-dollars. (SEE: Obama Orders US State Department To Fund Homosexual Groups Overseas; Kyle Rogers; 12/6/11)
The Examiner.com also reports that: Friends of Christopher Stevens in Chicago say he was [homosexual]. A member of the Serbian team based in Chicago told HillBuzz.org that the State Department knowingly sent a [homosexual] man to be ambassador of Libya. HillBuzz.org reports in Chicagos diplomatic circles at least there is no doubt that Chris Stevens was [homosexual]. (NOTE: The Examiner.com employed the assignation gay. But utilizing gay as an assignation for homosexual is antithetical to my linguistic belief system, ergo, my usage of the correct assignation homosexual) (SEE: http://www.examiner.com/article/did-hillary-clinton-send-gay-ambassador-to-libya-as-intentional-provocation)
The question that begs an answer is why are Obama and Clinton so committed to forcing homosexuality on the world, especially in areas of the world that supposedly condemn the practice? Which brings me back to the question I asked yesterday which is: Why is the Obama administration denying the embassy attack was a planned attack?
There is more here than meets the eye. I have my suspicions as to the answers to the questions Im asking, and if Im right, Obama and Clinton are worse than anything we could have remotely suspected.
There is more here than meets the eye. I have my suspicions as to the answers to the questions Im asking, and if Im right, Obama and Clinton are worse than anything we could have remotely suspected.
It seems like almost every Libyan in every picture I’ve seen of Stevens has a cell phone in hand ... and I’m sure many of those phones have camera/video capabilities. There are pictures/videos out there of what REALLY happened to Stevens .... it’s just a matter of time before they surface. Omuslim/Hillary can try to hide the truth, but it will ‘out’. Americans should be outraged now, without those images, but it’s going to be oh-so-ugly when they do turn up.
Because Obama is gay and Clinton is a lesian.
There certainly is a lot to legitimately question in that comment. Conjurs up any number of opinions as to WHY.
My opinion, is that Obama has no respect for anyone, he deliberately assigned Chris Stevens to Libya to be murdered because he was a homosexual.
I think he deems them "expendable". In his warped thinking, he believed Americans would simply say, Oh well, he was a homosexual, nothing lost. BOY WAS HE WRONG and I am mad as hell that he would think such a thing. JMO
I know of NO Republican, Christian, or right winger that thinks a good homosexual is a dead homosexual. NO ONE.
A good tweet on this subject should be in order. "What does Obama have against homosexuals?"
Christopher Stevens was set up and sacrificed for Obama's cause, he never stood a chance.
If Mr. Soetoro, and Hillary are to be believed, anal rape of an American ambassador, murder him, and dragging his dead body throught the streets now has the moral equivalency of a bad movie review.
I don’t understand why liberal homosexuals aren’t upset with Hillary and Obama for sending Stephens (a gay man) to a Muslim country. I would think the gay community would be furious.
Protecting Obama?
There is no mystery, it’s just normal behavior for them:
The Sexual Rage Behind Islamic Terror
“Socially segregated from women, Arab men succumb to homosexual behavior. But, interestingly enough, there is no word for “homosexual” in their culture in the modern Western sense. That is because having sex with boys, or with effeminate men, is seen as a social norm.”
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=246
Kyle Rogers of Examiner.com reported that: According to leading Arab media outlets Stevens murder was more horrible than reported by U.S. media. The Arab media reports that Stevens was beaten, gang raped, killed, and then his body was publicly displayed in a manner similar to Gaddafi.
Does anyone here have specific citations to those "leading Arab media outlets" and accurate translations of what each reported? Those citations and translations would go a long way toward totally discrediting the Regime's lies about what happened to Stevens.
Obama is a gay muslim. He has no idea what side he wants to express. I hope it eats him to an early grave!
Maybe some links/sources here ....
Unless he was unconsciously trying to commit suicide by proxy, I doubt very much that Obama sent Stevens to be deliberately killed due to homosexual identity. Far from it. Obama and Hillary set him up, and he was killed; but that's because they are:
1) promoters of homosexuality (what could be wrong with promoting it in the Middle East, where they execute people for it, you may ask yourself, and
2) alleged practitioners of homosexuality, and
3) stupid ignorant irresponsible callous jackwagons who denied the Marines the use of bullets to protect the Ambassador, who should have been protected not only because he was an Ambassador, but also because he was an American.
This is during the same week that Puppetmistress Valerie Jarrett got a SIX-MAN SECRET SERVICE DETAIL TO PROTECT HER VACATION IN CAPE COD.
Both Obama and Hillary are BOHICies for the entire muslim terrorist enterprise. They may be Alinskyites domestically; but in foreign policy they are both Chamberlainist appeasement cultists:
Good catch. Thanks.
I know they are promoters of homosexuality, but I don't think it is too far fetched to suggest they also used that homsexuality to their murderous benifit.
Stevens was perfect sacrifice for their mission, thinking that the American people would just say, "oh well, He was just a homosexual, nothing lost" I truly believe that is how they thought this would play out, it backfired.
I deplore everything about Obama and Hillary and pray this blows up in the face real quick, no doubt there is MUCH MORE to this story.
Sodom Hussein Obama
Hitlery Clintong
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.