Skip to comments.
Warp Drive May Be More Feasible Than Thought, Scientists Say
SPACE.com ^
| 2012-09-17
| Clara Moskowitz
Posted on 09/17/2012 10:28:10 AM PDT by justlurking
A warp drive to achieve faster-than-light travel a concept popularized in television's Star Trek may not be as unrealistic as once thought, scientists say.
A warp drive would manipulate space-time itself to move a starship, taking advantage of a loophole in the laws of physics that prevent anything from moving faster than light. A concept for a real-life warp drive was suggested in 1994 by Mexican physicist Miguel Alcubierre, however subsequent calculations found that such a device would require prohibitive amounts of energy.
Now physicists say that adjustments can be made to the proposed warp drive that would enable it to run on significantly less energy, potentially bringing the idea back from the realm of science fiction into science.
"There is hope," Harold "Sonny" White of NASA's Johnson Space Center said here Friday (Sept. 14) at the 100 Year Starship Symposium, a meeting to discuss the challenges of interstellar spaceflight.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Technical; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: aerospace; alcubierre; alcubierredrive; ftl; haroldgwhite; haroldsonnywhite; nasa; stringtheory; warpdrive
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-145 next last
To: UCANSEE2
Not if you condense space and get there at relative speeds far in excess of the speed of light. That’s the whole idea, if every minute you can “move” through one squished light then your destination won’t have done much in the way of drifting, couple inches maybe, but you’re not warping that close.
101
posted on
09/17/2012 4:00:19 PM PDT
by
discostu
(Welcome back my friends to the show that never ends.)
To: Las Vegas Ron; jonno
Inertial dampening takes care of this - hello??!! The problem is that the state of 'inertial dampening' is just as advanced as the state of 'warp drive'.
102
posted on
09/17/2012 4:00:27 PM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
( If you think I'm crazy, just wait until you talk to my invisible friend.)
To: Defiant
when we can warp space-time and travel faster than light,You can do that now, but you have to be dead first.
103
posted on
09/17/2012 4:02:40 PM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
( If you think I'm crazy, just wait until you talk to my invisible friend.)
To: justlurking
Traveling through hyperspace ain't like dusting crops, boy! Without precise calculations we could fly right through a star, or bounce too close to a supernova and that'd end your trip real quick, wouldn't it?"And the monkey flips the switch."
104
posted on
09/17/2012 4:06:14 PM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
( If you think I'm crazy, just wait until you talk to my invisible friend.)
To: GeronL; skinkinthegrass; AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; ...
105
posted on
09/17/2012 4:07:13 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: Pontiac
It would be an interesting equation however an object of infinite mass striking an immovable object. There is no such thing as an immovable object in space.
106
posted on
09/17/2012 4:10:16 PM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
( If you think I'm crazy, just wait until you talk to my invisible friend.)
To: Syntyr
Fine but I get to be assimilated by hot female borgs!Make sure to bring plenty of MACHINE OIL.
107
posted on
09/17/2012 4:12:43 PM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
( If you think I'm crazy, just wait until you talk to my invisible friend.)
To: Las Vegas Ron
Actually there would be no perceptible acceleration within an Alcubierre bubble. The bubble is accelerated, but within the bubble there would be no perceptible movement.
108
posted on
09/17/2012 4:22:50 PM PDT
by
Feynman
To: Las Vegas Ron
>>What about the effects on the human body during acceleration/deceleration?<<
Only a problem if they go to plaid.
109
posted on
09/17/2012 4:29:37 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(“We can’t just leave it (food choice) up to the parents.” moochele obozo 2/12/2012 (cnsnews))
To: Starstruck; mc5cents
>>7 elements have been added to the periodic chart since I went to school. None have involved “ground up unicorns”. <<
That you know of...
110
posted on
09/17/2012 4:32:39 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(“We can’t just leave it (food choice) up to the parents.” moochele obozo 2/12/2012 (cnsnews))
To: freedumb2003
That really made me laugh out loud.
It’s been a while since I have been able to work a Spaceballs joke into conversation.
111
posted on
09/17/2012 4:33:51 PM PDT
by
justlurking
(The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
To: Dallas59
Which Enterprise is that?
112
posted on
09/17/2012 4:39:01 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(“We can’t just leave it (food choice) up to the parents.” moochele obozo 2/12/2012 (cnsnews))
To: justlurking
This is easy:
1. Pick the place in interstellar space you want to be.
2. Press the button
3. Space-Time folds like a taco onto the location you are currently at, allowing you to move to the location you want to be.
4. Ship moves to that location.
5. End of journey.
How much energy could it take to warp space-time? 10^639483 joules here, 10^639483 joules there - eventually it ends up running into real energy required.
113
posted on
09/17/2012 4:40:43 PM PDT
by
RinaseaofDs
(Does beheading qualify as 'breaking my back', in the Jeffersonian sense of the expression?)
To: RinaseaofDs
1. Pick the place in interstellar space you want to be. 2. Press the button
3. Space-Time folds like a taco onto the location you are currently at, allowing you to move to the location you want to be.
4. Ship moves to that location.
5. End of journey. War drive fuel:
114
posted on
09/17/2012 4:45:28 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(“We can’t just leave it (food choice) up to the parents.” moochele obozo 2/12/2012 (cnsnews))
To: justlurking
Scientists surprised to find warp drive more feasible than the Chevy Volt.
115
posted on
09/17/2012 4:49:48 PM PDT
by
dangerdoc
(see post #6)
To: Pontiac
Think of it in terms of competing gravity wells. Instead of the negative potential in front of you “pushing” the objects space/time out of the way, you’d “skim” around the rim of the heavier masses space/time curve...
116
posted on
09/17/2012 5:02:11 PM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(I will not comply.)
To: Jack Hydrazine; ELS; ToxicMich; paintriot; Cronos; A_perfect_lady; Art in Idaho; perplyone; ...
117
posted on
09/17/2012 5:07:51 PM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(Romney / Ryan 2012)
To: freedumb2003
I figure we could just hook up the flux capcitor or even the descronificator module ;)
118
posted on
09/17/2012 6:13:53 PM PDT
by
Las Vegas Ron
(Medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism)
To: GeronL
According to my initial calculations, the astronaut’s skull and his rectum would trade places. One immediate problem from this would be difficulty in reading charts. Wearing earphones would also become difficult.
119
posted on
09/17/2012 7:03:57 PM PDT
by
Tucker39
( Psa 68:19Blessed be the Lord, who daily loadeth us with benefits; even the God of our salvation.KJV)
To: Eepsy
The other series he writes isn’t too bad; I listened to the audiobooks at the job I had from fall last year-March of this year.
120
posted on
09/17/2012 7:31:51 PM PDT
by
wastedyears
(The First Law of Heavy Metal: Not all metal is satanic.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-145 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson