Posted on 09/17/2012 9:43:45 AM PDT by Be Careful
TOPEKA The State Objections Board brought the issue of President Barack Obamas eligibility to be on Kansas ballots to a swift end Monday morning.
After accepting several records related to Obamas birth in Hawaii, Mark Dugan, Lt. Gov. Jeff Colyers chief of staff, moved to overrule the objection and close the boards meeting.
The boards unanimous vote brings an end to an objection raised by Manhattan resident Joe Montgomery, who said Obama shouldnt be on Kansas ballots and isnt qualified to be president because his parents were not both born in the United States.
Read more here: http://www.kansas.com/2012/09/17/2492998/kansas-expects-to-end-challenge.html#storylink=cpy
(Excerpt) Read more at kansas.com ...
I guess my version of the 14th is a BIT different than the copy you’re reading.
From mine, I see no way a British subject can birth a NBC...
Learn something new everyday </s>
Looking for courage and a work ethic from the baby boom generation? That would be novel, wouldn't it?
But then again when youve got Thief Justice - Its not my job - Roberts as a role model, I guess this to be expected in the NEW AMERICA.
We are so functionally broken that we can't even make people aware of how dysfunctional we are. Nature will correct the problem, but I fear nature is not concerned with how much blood letting will occur from it's correction.
Geez, now you are stating that I said something which I did not say, followed by ridicule. Is this National Strawman Day?
I merely pointed out a printed falsehood in the original post of this thread. Under the logic of that falsehood, Romney should not be on the ballot, as well. Maybe the original poster made an error due to zeal. I don’t know, but if you re-read what he wrote and still don’t get it, you never will.
No one can be as stupid as you are pretending to be. To not understand my point about Romney as it related to the first post in this thread is downright scary. Since you are capable of stringing words together, I have to assume you are trying to be an idiot. Congratulations! Success is yours.
What a photostat of a microfiche of a birth announcement in a newspaper? A pdf and a jpg?
And what of the issue of “natural born citizen” (does that mean one or two parents of American citizenship)?
Wouldn't the actual birth certificate have sufficed? Was a paper copy produced? Or a digital file?
Wouldn’t the actual birth certificate have sufficed? Was a paper copy produced? Or a digital file?
__
From what I understand, it was an official verification letter, like those sent to Arizona and the attorneys in Mississippi. Under Hawaiian law, it constitutes legal proof of the information it contains.
I believe that, at least in the case of Arizona, it would not have been legal for Hawaii to issue an actual birth certificate to them, but the law does permit a verification letter under those circumstances. Perhaps the same was true here.
Sorry, moron. I am not pretending to be stupid. You made a statement suggesting that you can read Joe Montgomery’s mind like a psychic, and then tried to explain it with logic, which you know absolutely nothing about.
Looking back at some of your previous posts, I see that you also support homos and muslims. What’s up with that garbage?
I read what was written and pointed out a factual error. This enraged you, or worse, showed your lack of reading comprehension.
Now you are left to smear because you are an intellectual lightweight.
I had hoped you were capable of basic concepts. I was wrong.
You are just another Internet tough guy. No brains and no guts. I am done with you. Discussions with Kent Dorfmans are a waste of time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.