Posted on 09/16/2012 4:45:22 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
On 9/11/12, America became victim to yet another terrorist attack. We've learned now that the Obama regime provided little if any security for our Embassy in Libya. Essentially, Christopher Stevens and associates were sitting ducks for an attack coinciding with a date most infamous for terror attacks on Americans. From a security perspective, how could any American serving overseas in the Middle East been left so incredibly vulnerable on this day?
Unbelievable that we'd even think possible, but the question here is "Did our gov't allow or even enable these attacks, either proactively or through willful negligence?" If so, for what purpose?
If we are to recognize that Obama would want nothing more than to shift the focus of the upcoming debates away from his miserable record on the economy than we might want to consider this as the motive for his enabling these attacks. Also consider the possibility that the Obama regime was looking for a way to provide cover for rising gas prices as a result of his assault on our oil industry. What better way to 'explain away' those rising fuel prices than to have uprisings in the Middle East just in time for the 2012 presidential election? Step back and look at the forest here, not the trees!.. Isn't this all a bit too coincidental, and does anyone really buy the Obama-controlled media's false narrative that these attacks are because of a movie which was posted on YouTube two months ago? Are we THAT gullible?
Our government's immediate response was to blame an American filmmaker and apologize for the movie's insulting of Islam. While we Americans waited, and waited, AND WAITED for President Obama to condemn the perpetrators, all we got was silence. When Romney decided to fill the void and make a comment denouncing the Obama regime's handling of this situation, he quickly became a target of the news media. At every turn in this critical situation, both the Obama regime and the news media's statements and actions have been completely irrational. Something's wrong here, folks. An immediate condemnation of Islamic extremism and terrorism has been sorely lacking throughout the course of these events. This diversion on behalf of all Obama regime members, including Susan Rice who insists the Libya attack was spontaneous and not planned is an obvious attempt to shift blame from Obama's failed foreign policy squarely onto the shoulders of Americans exercising their right to free speech; A filmmaker and Mitt Romney.
What we have here is the shifting of blame AWAY from terrorists and onto Americans. Blaming a rogue band of thugs with heavy weapons instead of an premeditated, organized group such as Al Qaeda reflects an administration that avoids placing blame where blame is due; Islamic terrorists.
And to those who immediately shun the notion that Obama is a Muslim, or worse, that Obama is a Muslim who is using his position of power to foment, aid and abet the spread of the Islamic Caliphate against the 'West' (United States and Israel), you may want to seriously reconsider. The missed opportunities or statements or actions or lack thereof on behalf of Barack Hussein Obama throughout this crisis aren't those taken by a President on the side of Israel or America, that is quite clear. Hillary celebrating Ramadan with the Libyan Ambassador at our State Department two days after the attack on our Consulate or Obama's meeting with the Muslim Brotherhood while rejecting Netanyahu of Israel's request for a meeting is clear indication of not only Obama's Muslim allegiance and life's mission but is also a sign that he is an 'enemy of the State' as defined by the Constitution of the United States of America.
It has also occurred to me that the Muslim 'Raging Spring' could have been triggered by Obama to set Israel up for being the bad guy when they finally strike Iran. It's a whole new ballgame now.
They knew about it 48 hrs prior and 0bama slept through it...ON PURPOSE!
BTT
Instead of wag the dog Obama’s going to try to wag the whole kennel... /g
Maybe Obama’s trying to focus voters’ attention on his horrible foreign policy record.
Yeahhh but do you think that it really helps Obama ?
NO bama !
anybody who believes we might not have an election ... do we want to read their vanity threads?
Each state runs its own elections. And the electoral college meets ... you’d have to research what happens if the state courts cannot decide who the electors are ... there are state laws that cover these matters. And if the electoral college fails, it goes to the HOUSE, where the election takes place.
Obambi has no more authority over the state elections than Mittster does.
Yeah, I don’t buy this theory. Despite many things that he’s done wrong in international affairs, there wasn’t much to use in the campaign. The flaws in his policy were not campaign soundbite material. The only thing that the R/R campaign had been able to use was the apology tour and bowing to foreign leaders.
Now, there is a literal flood of things to use, and a central message...Obama’s approach failed. It also opens up new comparisons to Carter in mid east affairs to go along with his Carter-like economic record. This does not make it easier for the Democrats at all.
Video—>YouTube—>INTERNET! ...Control.
By the time the msm is done with it it will have been Romney’s sinister plan all along. And po’ wittle picked on FOTUS.
To me this whole thing just makes Baraq look even more incompetent. Plus it almost certainly cranks up oil prices which is another negative for the economy and all those gas price signs on every corner will start with a 4 or 5.
...you get violent demonstrations going on in this country, BHO declares martial law and cancel elections indefinitely in the name of public safety.
The thing that drives their movie excuse to shambles is there is and always are movies bashing Islam. Just go to Youtube and type in ‘Islam sucks’ or ‘islam is evil’ ‘mohammed sucks’ just name it, it’s nothing new. Take this one for example, it’s been up since 2008....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XoD-v9_JCtY
Actually IMO, this makes his foreign policy look terrible, IN ADDITION to his economic policy (or lack of). The MSM has been working overtime to divert attention from the hard questions the needs to be asked, and to cover up details. They are having a hard time as details are spilling out on the internet.
It’s hard to vote when Martial Law is declared though.
I am starting to think we conservatives are nutty tinfoil freaks. Why arent these issues being discussed on every news outlet in the country? Unfortunately, Obama is, again, given a pass from media. Aren’t there any starving, want-to-make-a-name-for-themselves, journalists? Specifically ones that work for the MSM, or are they given orders from the top to stand down on Obama investigations? Seriously, what the hell is going on, have we been already overtaken by the enemy?
First, Obama and the media are blaming it all on a movie, not Obama. Obamabots buy into that crap. Secondly, ‘foreign policy’ is not in Romney or Ryan’s wheelhouse.
Strange how the muslims are protesting all over the world, even in England and Australia but not here?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.