Posted on 09/15/2012 5:45:03 AM PDT by bergmeid
A 20 minute video by Michele Bachmann that explains EXACTLY what is going on in the world that is now going crazy, and the role of Barack Hussein Obama.
where is the movie
Michelle Bachmann, Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich are three people who are good candidates to explain this stuff.
.
This is a link to the movie: http://www.patriotsdonotcomply.com/movies/Sam-Bacile-Muhammad-Movie-FULL-HD-Innocence-of-Muslims.mp4
And *that* is worth getting all up in arms about? It’s a stupid, poorly-produced parody. Why is anyone even having a reaction to that vapidity?
Awesome...and frightening. It has come down to this, America: Either Obama is removed, or America is finished.
See my link, above.
Outstanding!!! This is a must see...and the OIC can rot. BTTT
I am afraid I made the wrong subject line. The stupid, badly done movie on youtube that is causing all the worldwide craziness in the world is a set up. Please listen to Michelle’s video at the link in which she explains what is really going on.
i agree with you that the youtube clip is horrible and badly done.
"If the reaction of U.S. officials in the face of such an assault is to “condemn . . . efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims” (the initial response of the U.S. embassy in Cairo) and to try to silence individual citizens, there is good reason for the terrorists to believe that, with more acts of terror, they will also change American policies. The unpleasant fact is that the Obama administration has encouraged our adversaries to keep at it."
Michelle explains that the OIC is behind the youtube movie in order to ensure that it will become illegal in the US to speak out against islam. Barack obama is instrumental in this.
There is disquiet currently in the US about the Obama Administration’s record of apparent complicity in furthering the OIC agenda in this country given recent capitulation by the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security to demands of Muslim advocacy groups for self censorship. That is reflected in the deracination of any criticism of Islam from official lexicons, banning training materials and acknowledged experts in Jihad doctrine and terrorism assessment from courses providing training in counter-terrorism. Muslim advocacy groups in the US have even tried to rationalize access to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act for possible criminal prosecution of Islam criticism given allegations of "racism" committed against a religion, Islam. In December, the State Department will hold a summit with the executive director of the OIC, which had been given special envoy status under the Bush Administration. This conference will be a furtherance of declarations made by Secretary Hillary Clinton at an international conference in Istanbul about implementing measures adopted in March 2011 at the UNHRC about “discrimination on the basis of religious belief”– a code word for Islamic blasphemy. This comes dangerously close to threatening free speech, including criticism of religion, considered protected under the First Amendment of the US Constitution and reflected in a number of Supreme Court rulings.
She suggests that we go to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation website and read their 10 year plan of action.
It is very, very informative. First, the group is an attempt to bring together all 57 states (ring a bell?) of Islam to establish what would seem to be a United Nations-like organization “to promote international peace and harmony” as well as “safeguard and protect the interests of the Muslim world.” They intend to speak for all Muslims.
Promoting peace and harmony. That sounds nice. They also want to set up a means for the resolution of conflict between member states that avoids violence, they want to respect the right of self-determination for Member States, to condemn terrorism in all its forms as un-Islamic, to safeguard and promote the rights of women (in accordance with the laws and legislation of Member States, of course), They propose establishing a means to consolidate and authorize fatwas, presumably to prevent rogue imams from going off the reservation. And they want to create conditions for sound upbringing of Muslim youth and inculcation of Islamic values through education.
The beautiful language related to the principles of the preceding paragraph is all that the useful idiots in the West will focus on. See the Islamic world wants to play nice. But to understand the real mission of the organization you have to look a little closer.
For example, they want to combat Islamophobia. Fair enough, I suppose. Here is part of how they want that to occur: “Endeavor to have the United Nations adopt an international resolution to counter Islamophobia, and call upon all States to enact laws to counter it, including deterrent punishments.”
Laws and deterrent punishments? I think it is safe to assume that they will be the sole arbiter of what constitutes Islamophobia as well as the sole arbiter of what constitutes appropriate deterrent punishment. And given the inroads that sharia law has made in our own justice system, I also suspect that our courts will be expected to look to the OIC for guidance.
Any organization reveals its true goals when it establishes standing committees through its charter. A standing committee represents the work that the organization thinks is so important it needs to be a continual focus. They have four standing committees, most with innocuous sounding names. Number one among them is a committee named simply “Al Quds Committee.” By making that committee their first order priority they reveal everything you need to know about them. They remain more focused on Israel than anything else, calling for an end to Israeli occupation and the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with al Quds (Jerusalem) as its capitol.
In my opinion the ultimate purpose of the OIC is to provide a “legal” framework for a consolidated federation of all Islamic states. They already represent the largest voting bloc in the United Nations, and were it not for the Security Council, the OIC might not even be necessary. Regardless, with the rise of the OIC, the UN will become even more irrelevant than it is today.
Of course, their charter documents won’t mention it, but in time the OIC will create a standing army, and will, in time, provide a legal pretext for the elimination of Israel. Strip away all the florid language about human rights and cooperation, and that is all this is about. Simply another means to achieve Islamic domination of the world.
And our current leadership is at the very least too PC to even see it, much less do anything about it. and at the very worst—complicit.
Google rejects White House request
///
LIBERAL controlled Google, “refuses” to pull a video,
that the liberals claim is causing people to be killed?
-
when Google has quickly removed many other,
higher quality videos, for much less reasons?
(often simply from a few complaints).
-
obviously, if Obama really wanted the video pulled,
it would be...
thanks for posting a great analysis of what is behind those beautiful noble sounding words and the real goals of the OIC.
Political correctness is ‘Cultural’ Marxism’ and it is not a surprise that the methods and goals of Marxism and ‘political’ Islam are very similar ... world wide conquest through deception.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.