Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/15/2012 5:45:06 AM PDT by bergmeid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: bergmeid

where is the movie


2 posted on 09/15/2012 5:47:10 AM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bergmeid

Michelle Bachmann, Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich are three people who are good candidates to explain this stuff.


4 posted on 09/15/2012 5:56:55 AM PDT by tsowellfan ("Real leaders don't follow polls. Real leaders change polls")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2931240/posts?page=32#32


6 posted on 09/15/2012 6:03:09 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bergmeid
Give a hint? We have satellite, and our resources are low (lot's of youtube used around here). We have a monthly roll over, so if we use too much, our Internet will slow down for what seems like forever.

.

7 posted on 09/15/2012 6:08:35 AM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bergmeid

This is a link to the movie: http://www.patriotsdonotcomply.com/movies/Sam-Bacile-Muhammad-Movie-FULL-HD-Innocence-of-Muslims.mp4

And *that* is worth getting all up in arms about? It’s a stupid, poorly-produced parody. Why is anyone even having a reaction to that vapidity?


8 posted on 09/15/2012 6:13:42 AM PDT by Theo (May Christ be exalted above all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bergmeid

Outstanding!!! This is a must see...and the OIC can rot. BTTT


11 posted on 09/15/2012 6:14:14 AM PDT by SueRae (See it? Hell, I can TASTE November from my house!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bergmeid
From the Weekly Standard.....

"If the reaction of U.S. officials in the face of such an assault is to “condemn .  .  . efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims” (the initial response of the U.S. embassy in Cairo) and to try to silence individual citizens, there is good reason for the terrorists to believe that, with more acts of terror, they will also change American policies. The unpleasant fact is that the Obama administration has encouraged our adversaries to keep at it."

13 posted on 09/15/2012 6:25:39 AM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bergmeid

She suggests that we go to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation website and read their 10 year plan of action.

It is very, very informative. First, the group is an attempt to bring together all 57 states (ring a bell?) of Islam to establish what would seem to be a United Nations-like organization “to promote international peace and harmony” as well as “safeguard and protect the interests of the Muslim world.” They intend to speak for all Muslims.

Promoting peace and harmony. That sounds nice. They also want to set up a means for the resolution of conflict between member states that avoids violence, they want to respect the right of self-determination for Member States, to condemn terrorism in all its forms as un-Islamic, to safeguard and promote the rights of women (in accordance with the laws and legislation of Member States, of course), They propose establishing a means to consolidate and authorize fatwas, presumably to prevent rogue imams from going off the reservation. And they want to create conditions for sound upbringing of Muslim youth and inculcation of Islamic values through education.

The beautiful language related to the principles of the preceding paragraph is all that the useful idiots in the West will focus on. See the Islamic world wants to play nice. But to understand the real mission of the organization you have to look a little closer.

For example, they want to combat Islamophobia. Fair enough, I suppose. Here is part of how they want that to occur: “Endeavor to have the United Nations adopt an international resolution to counter Islamophobia, and call upon all States to enact laws to counter it, including deterrent punishments.”
Laws and deterrent punishments? I think it is safe to assume that they will be the sole arbiter of what constitutes Islamophobia as well as the sole arbiter of what constitutes appropriate deterrent punishment. And given the inroads that sharia law has made in our own justice system, I also suspect that our courts will be expected to look to the OIC for guidance.

Any organization reveals its true goals when it establishes standing committees through its charter. A standing committee represents the work that the organization thinks is so important it needs to be a continual focus. They have four standing committees, most with innocuous sounding names. Number one among them is a committee named simply “Al Quds Committee.” By making that committee their first order priority they reveal everything you need to know about them. They remain more focused on Israel than anything else, calling for an end to Israeli occupation and the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with al Quds (Jerusalem) as its capitol.

In my opinion the ultimate purpose of the OIC is to provide a “legal” framework for a consolidated federation of all Islamic states. They already represent the largest voting bloc in the United Nations, and were it not for the Security Council, the OIC might not even be necessary. Regardless, with the rise of the OIC, the UN will become even more irrelevant than it is today.

Of course, their charter documents won’t mention it, but in time the OIC will create a standing army, and will, in time, provide a legal pretext for the elimination of Israel. Strip away all the florid language about human rights and cooperation, and that is all this is about. Simply another means to achieve Islamic domination of the world.

And our current leadership is at the very least too PC to even see it, much less do anything about it. and at the very worst—complicit.


16 posted on 09/15/2012 7:15:28 AM PDT by newheart (At what point does policy become treason?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bergmeid
Send it to any and all. She's telling us what the msm should be telling us. What a mess.
17 posted on 09/15/2012 7:38:12 AM PDT by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bergmeid; All

Google rejects White House request
///
LIBERAL controlled Google, “refuses” to pull a video,
that the liberals claim is causing people to be killed?
-
when Google has quickly removed many other,
higher quality videos, for much less reasons?
(often simply from a few complaints).
-
obviously, if Obama really wanted the video pulled,
it would be...


19 posted on 09/15/2012 8:11:12 AM PDT by Elendur (It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it goes. - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

sfl


21 posted on 09/15/2012 8:20:01 AM PDT by phockthis (http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bergmeid

bookmarked


22 posted on 09/15/2012 8:21:46 AM PDT by COUNTrecount (What Clint Said !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson