Posted on 09/11/2012 2:17:44 PM PDT by Eagles6
NEW YORK, NY – After a Maricopa County law enforcement agency conducted a six-month forensic examination which determined that the image of Obama’s alleged 1961 Certificate of Livej Birth posted to a government website in April, 2011 is a digital fabrication and that it did not originate from a genuine paper document, arguments from an Obama eligibility lawyer during a recent New Jersey ballot challenge hearing reveals the image was not only a fabrication, but that it was likely part of a contrived plot by counterfeiters to endow Obama with mere political support while simultaneously making the image intentionally appear absurd and, therefore, invalid as evidence toward proving Obama’s ineligibility in a court of law.
(Excerpt) Read more at teapartytribune.com ...
That works.
Sounds like Bill and Hillary Clinton. They believe they are completely above the law.
If this is what I’m thinking, I watched the video of the proceedings. That’s NOT exactly what she said. Yes, she said the BC wasn’t important but she did NOT admit it was a forgery. Don’t get all excited until you find the audio or transcript.
If not legit; nothing he has done is legit.
She didn't, actually.
Her argument was that there was no legal requirement to present a birth certificate, so the argument was moot, and the facsimile was irrelevant.
If the judge had ruled against her and required documentation, she certainly would have used the image as evidence. In any case, she wouldn't and didn't "admit forgery."
>> The Emperor may have no clothes, but the Republic is deaf, dumb, and blind.
A few of us continue to talk, to point it out, to show evidence, and even to shout about it with megaphones, but somehow we are the kooky ones. No amount of evidence, science, logic, or reasoning can penetrate the minds of those who refuse to look or listen.
This is a point I have thought about before.
If everything else is a lie, there is no reason to believe that the birth date given is the actual date. We could be barking up the wrong tree by looking for evidence for events (Stanley Ann overseas travel, for example) that happened on or near his stated birthday. Or trying to explain that she would not be traveling with an infant just days after his birth. Some events would become much more plausible if he were just a week older than stated.
Remember a couple of years ago when he misspoke about his birthday coming up “next week” when it was really further away than that? Just another slip? Any one of these errors taken alone could be easily explained, but there are just too many of them which have piled up to make them all just explainable slips of the tongue.
I thought it was “The clothes have no Emperor”. I agree about Rs being emasculated quivering pantswetting bunny wabbits.
There are a few good ones - like Issa, Gowdy and some others - but what a handful do against hundreds, led by (feh!) Boehner?
So if they want to say this can’t be used as evidence of ineligibility, how about we just use it as evidence of high crimes and misdemeanors, felonies, forgery, fraud, conspiracy, maybe treason, and probably about 50 other things that a competent lawyer might come up with to charge 0bama with.
Then indirectly, I think it would make him ineligible. Would a person guilty of a felony still be eligible? What were the grounds for hounding Nixon into resigning? Cover-up, iirc. Cover-ups don’t get much bigger than this.
FTA:Obama’s document forgery and fraudulent presidency have now forced him to flee to a “strange twilight zone” between political popularity and legal legitimacy where poorly counterfeited records are apparently allowed to be published by Obama using government media resources for political purposes, yet those same records are held by the courts as irrelevant for determining Obama’s legal eligibility status because they are, according to judges, “so poorly forged” they are obviously meant to be satirical and not to be taken seriously as evidence.
“So poorly forged.” That three word quote looks suspicious.
I'd want to see more of the context. It's hard to imagine a judge saying that in earnest and the whole quote not being picked up.
All you see on the internet is those three words being repeated in versions of this article. Wouldn't such an admission have at least motivated somebody to dig up the whole quote?
As in "if this document was forged, it was so poorly forged that no one would believe it." Until I see more, I suspect the judge was being satirical or ironic himself.
I think it is worse than that. The Republic is deaf because the media refuses to say anything about this issue. It is dumb because those who could speak are terrified of the MSM and the race card. It is blind because no one is willing to go against he MSM and put up images that show how much we are being lied to.
The new media is gaining ground, but much about President Obama will not be learned until after he is out of office, if ever. Unfortunately, there are some things that all of the Progressives, Democrat and Republican, join together to prevent coming out. This has enough weight of intimidation to silence 98 percent of even the new media. Consider that 50 years was not considered enough to make the evidence of the Kennedy assassination public.
” - - - Attorney Mario Apuzzo forced them to admit to and stipulate to in the NJ public hearing - - - “
PING!
Thanks for the ping.
Not quite. Georgia Congressman Nathan Deal sent an open letter to the White House in the Spring of 2009 asking for confirmation of Obama’s eligibility. His response was a formal ethics charge from the House ethics committee. They went through a decade or more of IRS records to find some issue they could question. The Justice Department can bankrupt any citizen using the almost bottomless pit of our taxes to fund investigations until the defendant is financially exhausted.
Deal is now Governor of Georgia. He had no alternative but to resign from Congress. It was clear that the Democrat Ethics Committee would pursue him until his resources and his family, who ran a wrecking yard in Georgia, were rendered bankrupt. It is no surprise that no one else tried. The silence from both parties is a fascinating symptom of the sickness permeating the legislature. For a couple of detailed analysis of the business of the legislature can be found in Peter Schweiker's "Throw Them All Out", which caused a law against insider trading which applied to legislators - before that they were immunce form SEC laws.
Remember Scooter Libby, against whom the US Attorney files charges after he had a confession from Dick Armitage in his hands. Armitage, who, like his boss Powell, never liked Bush or Cheney, kept quiet through three years of public pronouncements and trials. The dupe-propagandists in Hollywood even made a movie entirely based upon the fiction of Libby's involvement in the exposure of Plame and her old lefty husband, who worked for Obama’s campaign.
No problem. I haven’t had time to view videos yet. I usually keep up on this stuff but missed...from April no less
Hill went on to contort reasoning by implying that Obama needs only invoke his political popularity, not legal qualifications, in order to be a candidate.
What? This is satire, right? Unbelievable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.