everyone needs to talk to at least ONE person EVERY day and make sure they are registered to vote and they will vote for America. LETS DO IT !
millions of Americans who have died for our freedom over the last 200 years are watching
doesn’t matter. The only things that matter are Florida, VA and Ohio and to a lesser extent, Colorado. Obama might lose the popular vote by a few million and still win this thing which is why voting for an actual candidate that can actually defeat Obama is important.
Romney leads with a D+4 sample?
Hahahaha.
85% of Democrats would still vote for Obama.
Mass hypnosis, or mass insanity.
Seems like we already lost half the country..
Even if Mitt wins we will have to listen to the media for the next four years trashing everthing Republicans do..
What the heck, I feel like we are living in the twilight zone..
45% in the headline.
If it looks to Obama like he will lose, he will call off the election for some emergency.
Poll is weighted +8 Dem from latest D/R numbers...
Whew!
And 95%+ of them will answer, "Why?" with a garble that adds up to, "Becasue he's black." Same thing with O.J's acquittal. Sometimes I think blacks are more about race than white people.
I cant wait till Obozo is an Ex-President. We just thought Jimmy Carter was bitter! What I would give for a Romney landslide!!
One and Done, Obozo!
Seems the age of accountability and reason has bumped to 50 and older.
Obama leads Romney 50% to 46% among voters age 18 to 49 (49% of likely voters). Among voters age 50 and older (51% of likely voters), Romney leads Obama 52% to 43%.
Here comes Tribalism. Balkanized America.
ping
Interesting internals including the women’s vote, age group and cell phones. All much more pro Romney than I would have guessed.
Never heard of this polling outfit, but I guess its another one to add to the pile.
In New York City, where I live, David Dinkins, the first Black mayor, was a disaster. He was followed by Rudy Giuliani, who totally turned the city around, in much the same way the Chris Christie is turning New Jersey around. But Jersey is a state, and NYC is a city, so there’s a bit of difference. Christie is fixing the fiscal mess, while Giuliani was not only good on fiscal issues, he was amazing on quality of life issues.
Now here’s my point......nobody benefited more from Giuliani’s policies than Black people in poor, crime ridden neighborhoods. He made all these horrible neighborhoods better, and 10 years after he left office, some of the worst neighborhoods in NYC are continuing to improve. These are neighborhoods that first went into decline in the 1960s, and stayed that way for over 30 years.
I remember hearing stories about Black people in NYC who thought Giuliani was doing a great job, but they dare not say so in public, especially since the former Mayor was Black.
The bottom line is that it will be a long time before NYC ever elects another hard core Liberal as Mayor. Sure, Bloomberg is a total schmuck in many ways. Can’t stand the guy. But while he’s into central planning and nanny state meddling, he’s still pretty Centrist on a lot of issues.
I believe that one of the main reasons that a hardcore Liberal won’t become Mayor of NYC any time soon, is because the Blacks don’t want to see their neighborhoods go back to the hell holes that they were for so many years.
So maybe, if Romney turns things around, after Obama made the economic situation so much worse for Blacks, we’ll see something similar happen nationally that happened in NYC. In other words, no more hardcore Liberals getting elected POTUS, because the Blacks will realize that as much as they like to rail against “the man”, when they got one of their own elected POTUS, he just made things worse for them, and then a White Republican made things better for them.
Just a thought, I know, but one worth pondering.
bookmarked