Posted on 09/05/2012 2:00:52 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
Wow!The Dems are desperate.
SOP of the Chicago Alinsky communists.
Again.
Obama’s preferred tactic to “winning” is forced release of “scandalous” paperwork on the opposition.
Taxers are given more credibility by the DNC Media than “birthers”.
So the Dems can say that Romney was willing to pay a million to keep the info quiet?
This reeks of Obama and desperation.
BTW, Price Waterhouse calls bupkis on this.
hahhahaha...this is getting funny..they dont even know if its true. man.....
That is the problem with computers. Even children have access.
Long overdue for the Secret Service to get involved in protecting the candidates.
Yesterday the newly elected Quebec premiere may have been subject to an assassination attack ~ which I'm sure woke these guys up even if Karl Rove didn't.
Now we have Romney being blackmailed.
It's rough at the top.
There was no reason for the judge to open that file, other than politics. They had already been sealed by another judge, in the interest of the child.
Of course, Obama took the high road, saying "I don't think it's an appropriate topic for debate." But, if you truly believe he didn't know what was going on and coordinating with the attack dogs, I have a bridge in Chicago to sell you.
Are the democrats still screaming for Romney to release his tax returns?
There’s no one to blame for falling into this trap except for Romney and his backers in the primary. It is absolutely unacceptable for a candidate to try to keep secrets which could damage his candidacy if leaked. Everyone should have demanded his returns be published before he was given the nomination. I damn sure have no interest in losing the presidency just so Mitt can selfishly try to keep his tax returns secret at the risk of our party, the White House and the country. Keeping Mitt’s tax returns isn’t that important to me and shouldn’t be that important to him or anyone else. If the information in them would damage his candidacy, then he has an obligation to let us know. And if they wouldn’t, then he has nothing to lose by releasing them.
Bottom line is I don’t trust Mitt. Only an extremely naive, ignorant individual who was unaware of his record in politics and in Massachusetts could trust him. So I don’t believe Romney’s line that the Democrats will simply “twist” what’s in his tax returns to make it sound bad. And I’m very angry that he’s setting our party up for failure in the election by waiting for these to leak out at potentially the worst possible time.
I couldn’t care less how the information gets out. If Jack Ryan was taking his wife to group sex clubs and running for office on the hopes that it didn’t leak out, he shouldn’t be considered an acceptable nominee by our party. He should have told us that in the primary and let us decide if it mattered or not. Lord knows if we had information like that on Obama or any other Democrat, we would use it, and rightfully so. If you don’t think Jack Ryan’s private habits should be known to the voters then you must have also opposed when Drudge released the Monica Lewinsky information.
I dont think Romeny has anything to hide. its about inventing storys.
Thanks Sub-Driver. Joe the Plumber ping.
Amazing, isn't it?
I think even if Romney had released his tax returns, the dems would have found something else that he “must disclose “. These guys, even if it is a prank, should spend some time in jail, though they could be Nigerians for all we know.
Is Lex Luthor behind this?
Let ‘em publish the damned thing. Whatever is on it is on it.
So, what’s Julian Assange up to these days?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.