Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mormon Democrats gather for first-ever national meeting in Charlotte during DNC
NBC News ^ | 9/04/12

Posted on 09/04/2012 5:47:07 PM PDT by Libloather

Mormon Democrats gather for first-ever national meeting in Charlotte during DNC

Above, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, who belongs to the LDS Church, speaks to the first national meeting of LDS Democrats on Tuesday in Charlotte. Reid mentioned that several presidential candidates in the United States have been Mormons, starting with Joseph Smith, the founder and first president of the LDS Church, who ran in 1844 with "a very progressive" platform.

(Excerpt) Read more at photoblog.nbcnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2012dncconvention; charlotte; convention; dnc; harryreid; ldschurch; mormon; mormons; mormonvote
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Slyfox

You can have faith in God without being “organized”....


21 posted on 09/04/2012 11:09:22 PM PDT by Osage Orange ( Liberalism, ideas so good they have to be mandatory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin
When the gay's start looking into the $40-$50 billion dollar commercial enterprise of LDS, Inc. Then you might have a problem....

$37k? Ha! Not even a tiny drip in the bucket.

22 posted on 09/04/2012 11:14:31 PM PDT by Osage Orange ( Liberalism, ideas so good they have to be mandatory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin

The fine was for not disclosing these additional [donations]. The money the church donated was declared. The issue was employee time and supplies. This was not time or supplies that employees volunteered. I also worked and voted against Prop.8 so I have no problem with others doing so or your Churches support. But the facts are the Church was paying people to work on a political campaign.


23 posted on 09/04/2012 11:59:19 PM PDT by brightright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange
You can have faith in God without being “organized”....

Did I say you couldn't have faith without being organized?

No, I did not!

The guy was wondering if he should leave his religion because of the people in it who do not live up to the religion, and I encouraged him not to leave his faith because of the likes of Harry Reid.

Do not put words in my mouth.

24 posted on 09/05/2012 9:32:37 AM PDT by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox
My whole point was...you can leave your "religion" as you put it. But, you still or should still have your relationship with the Lord.

BTW...I wasn't placing "words in your mouth"...Ha!! Don't be so thin skinned.........

25 posted on 09/05/2012 9:51:09 AM PDT by Osage Orange ( Liberalism, ideas so good they have to be mandatory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: brightright
The Church.

By that you mean LDS, Inc.

26 posted on 09/05/2012 9:54:09 AM PDT by Osage Orange ( Liberalism, ideas so good they have to be mandatory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange

Sorry if my use of The Church was offensive. It was not my intention. My comment was in response to post #6 . The LDS,Inc. was fined for not fully disclosing donations to a political campaign. They did disclose financial donations but did not declare that they payed people to work on the campaign and donated supplies. All the talk about maybe the other side did it too, and the size of the fine does not change the fact that the LDS,Inc. helped finance and did not fully disclose its involvement in a political campaign.


27 posted on 09/05/2012 10:55:45 AM PDT by brightright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: brightright
All the talk about maybe the other side did it too, and the size of the fine does not change the fact that the LDS,Inc. helped finance and did not fully disclose its involvement in a political campaign.

It certainly does expose the bias of the persons discussing the issue.

28 posted on 09/05/2012 11:23:50 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin

You are correct about that. The Everybody does it, The Other guy is bad too, is usually used as a defense when there is no defense .


29 posted on 09/05/2012 11:50:19 AM PDT by brightright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: brightright

Not offensive at all. Just normal talk for mormons. Which I always think odd..but that’s just me.


30 posted on 09/05/2012 1:25:57 PM PDT by Osage Orange ( Liberalism, ideas so good they have to be mandatory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox; Osage Orange; vette6387

If I were to leave a given religion, it would be because I found it wasn’t consistent with God’s word, not because some person professing the same faith was a disappointment, or because leaders of the religion were found to be human after all. We each will give account to God for our own faithfulness, not the faithfulness of others.

Having said that, nothing wrong with a little human organization, as long as you don’t take it too seriously. Jesus will keep track of his own sheep very effectively. But some organization is helpful for our sakes. But it doesn’t have to be a massive, centrally controlled bureaucracy. This is why the distributed network model is preferred among many of us so-called Protestants; a top down human hierarchy based on a history of formal membership wrapped around a centrally controlled “oracle” can create some degree of uniformity by sheer force of bureaucratic will power, but it is equally capable of propagating uniform error as uniform truth.

By contrast, a distributed model based on shared belief in and subscription to the Biblical text avoids the faux uniformity issues, but has the problem of individuals seeing things as individuals do, through their own unique prism of experience and understanding. But that’s really a net advantage, because it amounts to peer review, as in science, which is beneficial. Inferior interpretations and practices can be identified and weeded out, with no one human person or organization having the power to prevent discovery or proclamation of the truth.

So organization is only as bad as the people in it, and as we are all sinners, that can be pretty bad. Therefore smaller is better, because local congregations promote local accountability. We have to keep each other honest by comparing our beliefs and practices to God’s word, and that will work better if we don’t give any one human or group too much power. But what will work the best is simply this:

2 Tim 2:19 Nevertheless the foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal, The Lord knoweth them that are his. And, Let every one that nameth the name of Christ depart from iniquity.

Peace,

SR


31 posted on 09/05/2012 2:11:59 PM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Springfield Reformer

Good post.


32 posted on 09/05/2012 2:45:27 PM PDT by Osage Orange ( Liberalism, ideas so good they have to be mandatory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson