Posted on 09/02/2012 12:35:04 PM PDT by Para-Ord.45
Despite a truckload of evidence, most of which will eventually find its way into the public domain, many still refuse to accept that Armstrong doped. He passed all those tests, they say, ignoring that he tested positive at the 1999 Tour de France, a problem solved through a backdated medical prescription. The believers also ignore the finding of six EPO positives from the 1999 Tour when Armstrong's samples were retrospectively tested.
"The tests are easy to beat. We're way, way ahead of the tests. They've got their doctors and we've got ours, and ours are better. Better paid, for sure."
Even the dimmest need spend only a millisecond researching what USADA have on Armstrong to know it is direct evidence, not hearsay.
(Excerpt) Read more at theaustralian.com.au ...
Why wasn’t he disqualified back then?
“I also heard he didn’t really have cancer, he faked it so they could take his balls of to make him more aerodynamic”
i know you’re being facetious, but did he father any children after his bout with testicular cancer, or were all born before his treatment?
“Bloody stupid discussion. The only thing that is interesting is whether USADA comes up with physical/chemical evidence or not. USADA is not able to present what they’ve got until the other hearings are over, so we’ll wait.”
i thought that Lance had given up contesting these allegations? if so, will the USADA make any presentation of their contested evidence?
"....the hundreds of details necessary to maintain the high-40s hematocrit level that keeps a racer competitive on the course and safe in the control room."
Hardly Lance Armstrong, at least not during the last couple of years, when his Hct seldom was above 44!
He has but others haven’t. Therefore there will be hearings and evidence will have to be presented.
USADA has promised to publish all the evidence they have eventually, but first after the hearings.
Well she sure showed him. He should have married that snitch.
Don’t care one way or the other about Armstrong. I used to enjoy watching the tour. Now I don’t.
They didn’t destroy Armstrong, they destroyed the sport.
Kinda like OLD NASCAR vs the gawd awful thing they have now.
Hope everyone is safe and happy.
BTW...If I ain’t happy, yunz ain’t safe.
Just sayin’.
Instead of posting another Lance Bash, why don't you address the comments made to you on your previous thread?
Para-Ord.45’s Creepy Obsession with Lance Armstrong…Is this a Man-Love thing?
Give it up Mikey, Lance isn't going to buy you a bike shop no matter how much you publicly hate him........
“Never fails, those that can, DO, those that can’t try to take them down, bite at their heals, and eat their s—t.”
Sorry, but it’s not necessarily the cream that rises to the top. Sometimes s**t floats. That’s not my comment on Armstrong, as I don’t know whether he cheated or not, but to assume that success is always merit based is just not defensible. Take a look at our current President.
Cheating? In sports?
Lessons (morals) of the story:
(1) Must cheat to win,
(2) For the sake of your fervent fans, don’t get caught, dude!
where is the trial?
the USADA never revealed anything to the public.
guilty or innocent.
There should be a trial where the evidence can be examined in the light of day.
PO45, where are you? Charges have been made and you’re obligated to answer them or be considered guilty as charged.
Same story, second verse. Are you going to post the third verse tomorrow?
Hiding in the same place following his similar thread which I posted a link to at #48........
There used to be a time here when such crap dumps were frowned upon...........but times have changed.
Lance Armstrong could be guilty as hell on all counts, and I’d still say that an anti-doping organization that takes seven to thirteen years to find and punish the guilty is to all intents and purposes useless at doing the job.
Remember the sinking of the USS Dan Rather. It lead the attack with no ammunition and ended up throwing a typewriter at Bush before slipping beneath the waves of irrelevance.
Heh. Wise up yourself. At this point, the only people who can continue to believe the hoax that is Lance Armstrong are the conspiracy theorists.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.