Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Floor fight: Grass-roots activists battle attempt to rig GOP convention delegate rules Updated
http://michellemalkin.com ^ | August 27, 2012 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 08/27/2012 2:32:18 PM PDT by Ron C.

Drew McKissick is a longtime conservative activist and blogger who is in attendance at the Republican National Convention’s Rules Committee meetings. He and others on the ground are sounding the alarm over rules changes that he and many other attendees believe will hurt grass-roots movement conservatives. The battle is being cast by some observers as a narrow fight between Ron Paul advocates and the rest of the party. Drew says that’s not true. And many other state delegations who oppose top-down delegate choices are chiming in.

First, here’s Drew’s call to arms (my emphasis added in bold):

Fellow conservatives,

Those who are in Tampa working to maintain the influence of grassroots conservatives in the Republican Party need your help!

(Excerpt) Read more at michellemalkin.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bow2rino; bow2rinoagenda; bow2romneycare; corruption; delegates; disenfranchising; floorfight; gopconvention; gopdelegates; michellemalkin; sourcetitlenoturl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last
Remaking the GOP into a leftist-top-down party - we need to just say NO - LOUDLY. Call your state reps - all state numbers are included in this article.
1 posted on 08/27/2012 2:32:25 PM PDT by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

Sounds like there will definitely be a third party at some time in the near future.


2 posted on 08/27/2012 2:37:36 PM PDT by woweeitsme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

if these lot want to be liberal on social issues then they need to have their on libertarian convention.

We are the republican party, it;s bad enough we allow Paul a platform to spew his liberal views at our nomination process.


3 posted on 08/27/2012 2:39:54 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

I’ve been trying to warn FR for two days on this and most Freepers, except for a few believe this is about Paulbots maneuvers when it’s not - it’s about the Establishment trying to push out any Tea Party and Conservative dissent or voice in the future. Wake up folks!!!


4 posted on 08/27/2012 2:40:01 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woweeitsme

Not unless you want to see that third party lose to Democrats for the next 3 to 4 elections. A third party is NOT the way to go. Keeping the GOP conservative is BY FAR easier than a third party. Just look at how many have been formed, and have gone nowhere!


5 posted on 08/27/2012 2:42:07 PM PDT by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

There will be NO further tolerance in the GOP
to anyone who dare oppose Romney Death Panels,
RomneyCARE/ObamaCARE, RomneyTAXES(”fees”)
or Romney Marriage, and especially ANYONE
who attempts to speak up about the truth.


6 posted on 08/27/2012 2:43:32 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session."- Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.; Jim Robinson; RedMDer; musicman; vox_freedom; STARWISE; DJ MacWoW; trisham; TheOldLady; ...

God bless them.

GO TEA PARTY PATRIOTS!


7 posted on 08/27/2012 2:44:23 PM PDT by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
YOU'VE GOT IT, Mike...

This is a power-play against the Tea Party movement - a move to 'democratize' the GOP. We can't let it happen.

Thankfully this may already be going down to defeat simply because the 'word got out' and it is being strongly opposed.

BUT - find your state number at the bottom of Malkin's article and strongly urge them to vote against this rule change!

8 posted on 08/27/2012 2:46:23 PM PDT by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: onyx
TX Onyx - XOXOXO

The grassroots have always chose the delegates, and the delegates choose the candidates - without a candidates ability to cut various delegates out of the process!

They want the candidate chosen by GOP 'insiders' to be able cut out delegates they think might not vote for them! That's what the Democrats do - and we don't want the GOP moving that direction in ANY WAY!

9 posted on 08/27/2012 2:52:35 PM PDT by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: manc
These ba$tard$ have infiltrated the County Committee where I live. One had the balls to tell me that he was more far right than I. This guy is completely clueless.
10 posted on 08/27/2012 2:53:56 PM PDT by elephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

This is “Romney” at work. Trying to ensure his 2016 run. Already trying to shut out a possible challenge.


11 posted on 08/27/2012 2:56:23 PM PDT by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: manc
You're right about the Ron Paul outfit - look how their Libertarian Party has faired - it's a dead third party, one of many.

But this kerfuffle isn't about the Paulites - this is about delegates being disenfranchised - not allowed to vote, IF the supposed nominee doesn't like how he THINKS they might vote!

12 posted on 08/27/2012 2:57:29 PM PDT by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

Another disturbing issue is that there is the new rule that the Republican National Rule committee (made of Establishment types) can change the rules whenever they want to with just a 3/4 vote.

Those rules govern the primaries. Historically the rules are changes only at the convention every 4 years. Now, if the Republican National Committee doesn’t like any of the rules passed in Tampa, it doesn’t have to wait four years, because with a 3/4 vote they can change things whenever they want to do so, this could affect the 2016 primaries because the Committee could do as they desire if they see somebody as a serious threat to Romney or somebody else. If you have rules that can change ahead of time, then the deck can be stacked

(imagine that President Romney goes to the left and lets just say for example that Sarah decides to primary him, well he and the GOPE can take a look at the lay of the land right before the primaries start and change the primary rules to benefit him or make it more difficult for Sarah to challenge him)


13 posted on 08/27/2012 2:59:05 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: onyx
You're right! This is Romney's doing (at the urging of dim-witted GOP-E operatives!) I think they might fail, but it certainly has to be fought - and fought hard!

Pick up your phone and call your state GOP party office, and demand that this new 'rule' be strongly opposed!

14 posted on 08/27/2012 3:02:08 PM PDT by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Romeny now pulls down his mask and is showing his true colors!


15 posted on 08/27/2012 3:04:16 PM PDT by elephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

OKay!


16 posted on 08/27/2012 3:10:33 PM PDT by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

sounds like the GOP “big tent” wants a ringmaster in charge instead of those in their “big tent”.


17 posted on 08/27/2012 3:11:38 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elephant; Ron C.

For sure. No doubt he heard Sarah Palin’s talk about a Third Party in 2016.

GO SARAH!


18 posted on 08/27/2012 3:11:47 PM PDT by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: elephant
We've known about his 'true colors' since the beginning. He's a Northeaster Liberal - and liberals hate it when the public can over-rule their shenanigans simply by punching a ballot.

This is a liberal attempt to stop the free-exercise of legitimate voters - albeit in the microcosm of delegate to a political convention.

19 posted on 08/27/2012 3:13:54 PM PDT by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

The GOP must die. It does not and will not speak for its people.

Third party is assured.


20 posted on 08/27/2012 3:15:09 PM PDT by Candor7 (Obama fascism article: http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson