Replies

Quite apparently or even obviously, the GOP-E committed itself to Romney early on which meant no money for Palin or anyone else in 2012. It was his turn, after all.

I have little doubt that should he win, she will be all over him like stink on _hit, every time he strays. She made it very obvious that he was her least favorite during the primary season.

Until this election's outcome is known, I'm sure Sarah Palin has no idea about her 2016 plans, let alone us or this writer!

Regarding MO, I think that guy, Akin will eventually drop out, and from what I've read, none of the primary challengers are eligible to run: (sore loser law). A brand new candidate would have to be selected.

Quite apparently or even obviously, the GOP-E committed itself to Romney early on which meant no money for Palin or anyone else in 2012. It was his turn, after all.

I'm not convinced that if Palin had won the primaries, the GOPe wouldn't have supported her candidacy.

I have little doubt that should he win, she will be all over him like stink on _hit, every time he strays. She made it very obvious that he was her least favorite during the primary season.

Yes, but Sarah herself strays. That's why I cannot support her. She did a radio interview several years ago where she basically proceeded to describe a plan where she would register illegal aliens so they could stay here and work. Now Obama has only opened that opporunity to a portion of the illegals, and folks here are upset about it. I don't want Obama or her to do it. What is she going to do when Romney announces his plan to do it? Take him to task? She can't.

Until this election's outcome is known, I'm sure Sarah Palin has no idea about her 2016 plans, let alone us or this writer!

Okay, then talk about her 2016 plans are premature aren't they. We agree on that. The writer of this article made some claims that he/she shouldn't have.

Regarding MO, I think that guy, Akin will eventually drop out, and from what I've read, none of the primary challengers are eligible to run: (sore loser law). A brand new candidate would have to be selected.

I personally hope he does. I know a lot of folks disagree. A new person may need to be floated. I have read some of the things you have, and it looks like that will have to come to pass. If so, perhaps Palin can join with others and get that person major attention.

Thanks to those of you who have helped contribute 94% towards the goal. If you haven't already, please click below and pencil yourself in.

Quite apparently or even obviously, the GOP-E committed itself to Romney early on which meant no money for Palin or anyone else in 2012. It was his turn, after all.

That right there is one of the main reasons I no longer give to GOP or Republican Senate Commmittee or anything like that...but directly to the candidate(s) I WANT

The GOP has pushed the same "good ole boy" at us every election.

And I don't see them backing too many women either.

As it was, they had to fix the caucus outcome in Iowa so it SEEMED that Romney had won. After the spotlight moved on to New Hampshire and Romney’s hometurf, they could say,, OOps! Santorum won. But as you say. the money was never going to anyone but Romney.