Posted on 08/21/2012 8:52:34 AM PDT by george76
Is America descending into a dependency state, where the majority uses its voting power to demand government services from taxpayers?
New research from Ranking Member of the Senate Budget Committee Jeff Sessions (R-AL) reveals that this reality may already be here, with more than 107 million Americans on some form of means-tested government welfare.
...
most voting-age Americans do not pay income taxes approximately 50.6 percent.
That includes 53.91 million Americans who pay nothing in income taxes, and another 64.7 million who get refunds in excess of what was owed. Thats 118.61 million out of 234.6 million Americans 18 years and older ...
The U.S. Constitution was designed to protect against such an outcome. The Founders did not want a democracy, which tends to be problematic because of the failure of minority rights to be defended against an arrogant or authoritarian majority. So, instead, the Founders created a republic.
In Federalist No. 10, James Madison wrote that in democracies, governments are too unstable and
(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...
NO!
We are not descending - we are already there.
Yup...”165 million Americans dependents of the State” IS tyranny!!!
Yup...”165 million Americans dependents of the State” IS tyranny!!!
Well, people who get refunds still pay taxes, they just don’t seem to know it.
I think the point is with EIC and other negative taxes he's talking about getting more than paid in.
and another 64.7 million who get refunds in excess of what was owed.
There has not been a republic since at least 1868.
As for the huge group who do not pay taxes, thank George Bush. Good enough reason to let the Bush tax cuts lapse.
You’re not obligated to explain but I’d be interested in knowing how it is that they do actually pay taxes.
Unless you are parsing facts by saying they pay for things that are taxed or that they pay SS or medicare tax or something like that ... they do not pay federal taxes.
“and another 64.7 million who get refunds in excess of what was owed.”
That’s just a bit of hyperbole there.
If you have, say, $3,000 witheld from your paycheck for Federal taxes and you owe $1,000 then you get a $2,000 refund. Which is a refund in excess of what you owe. It doesn’t mean anything wrong happened it just means you overpaid during the year and you got a refund.
Now there are also low income people who get tax credits in excess of what they owe and they end up getting payments from the IRS instead of a tax bill.
But a tax credit is not a refund.
You are correct. One can only be refunded what one actually paid. It is, however, a distinction without a difference with respect to those living off the taxes of others.
Which was murdered around the mid 1800's.
Once the balance tipped over 50%, all was lost. When you can buy half of the population, tyranny and despotism follows. Bunker down folks, it’s going to be a long night in America.
Economic collapse is next, followed by social collapse, followed by R2/CW2.
Do those figures include the hundreds of thousands of bureaucrats and propagandists (mostly local, some with federal funding), who draw large incomes to rob others of what they produce? Most of them aren’t doing anything but plotting and scheming the next officious, legalized robbery. And how about those in the many non-profits (and many in not-for-profits), who work in concert with the deleterious and otherwise useless government employees?
The situation is far worse than what the author portrays. Maybe he didn’t want to raise the ire of those who take the greatest amounts of debt/revenues to finish ruining the country. They are also the controlling constituents in politics.
It’s a plutocracy, although most of the favored constituents aren’t really rich (cash flow vs. debts). It’s an eduocracy and kleptocracy. Have fun. Enjoy the slide.
Or stop obstructing small, domestic manufacturing starts, repair shops and owner-building in rural areas.
Everyone is unknowingly getting a PhD education in the philosophies of Mr. and Mrs. Cloward.
Crash the system and guarantee everyone a government stipend.
They are doing SO well! Why do you think the USDA runs TV commercials in English and Spanish touting the advantages of food stamps?
Why were unemployment benefits extended to 99 weeks? After 99 weeks you come to depend on that check. What’s a government check-addicted slob to do? Why, just apply for SSI. Make up a malady, hire a SSI lawyer and apply for benefits. It may take a year or two but that’s a monthly check for life, no strings attached.
Of course, the check will rarely be for more than $900/month. But now that you have SSI a whole new word of “livin’ on the government” benefits opens. Free cell phone, food stamps, housing assistance, utility assistance, child care assistance, even CASH through the Family Independence (FI) program. Now you’ve got it made. Sit on the couch and watch your wide screen TV all day.
New “collapse” series out at 299days.com.
This one seems a lot more plausible. A partial collapse, with some remaining loyal/dependent on gov’t, some services available, but most things turning to community control.
WRT the article here, I mentioned to a libinlaw the other day that 103 million people were dependent on gov’t, and she angrily denied that that could be true. I asked how she knew so vehemently that it wasn’t true, and she just got madder.
Even the sheeperals know that the collapse is coming. But they want to stay in denial as long as possible.
my sigh is apropos to this thread.
I’m doing my taxes this week. The amount of petty BS I have to deal with only to find “that deduction isn’t for you” is driving me f’n nuts. Tyranny is already here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.