In as much as a pistol is primarily a short range, defensive weapon, just discarding the dud round is a (relatively) time consuming option, and even those well practiced in misfire drills are going to have their sight/target picture impeded by the drill. Me personally? I'd be more comfortable just pulling the trigger again. I've had three primer malfunctions in my life (one w/ handloads, two with factory). In every case, a second hammer strike has remedied the situation.
In traditional engagement ranges with rifles there is more time to clear the weapon, and while you would have to recycle a revolver to re-strike the dud round, all you have to do to fire the next round is pull the trigger again (presuming the dud wasn't the last round in the cylinder).
I'm not opposed to SA only pistols...indeed I've spent most of my morning replacing the shok-buff and doing some other minor maintenance on a Delta Elite, but when it come to my nightstand guardian, the CZ is my choice.
Yes, but military ammo is not handload or typical commercial factory ammo. They seal the primers with lacquer, for starters. If you check out military AARs, restrike almost never solves a failure to fire. I would also point out that if you need to restrike, the hammer is exposed and it takes little time to recock a 1911.
I would further point out that restrike is so important, many modern DA-type pistols don’t actually have it. Glocks don’t, for example, and the militaries and police that have adopted them don’t seem to see as a problem.