And on that list should be a PAPER birth certificate from the Hawaii department of records with the chain of custody supervised by Sheriff Arpaio.
And if the HDOH comes forward with any record that is legally valid, the actual paper supporting documents, computer transaction logs, and microfilms would have to be audited as well, because Alvin Onaka has already indirectly confirmed to AZ SOS Ken Bennett that the record they have for Obama is not legally valid. Anything they present that is legally valid is in conflict with the legal document Onaka has already provided, and the only way to know which document is truthful is by auditing the entire record and the procedures.
There have been 2 different BC numbering methods described by HDOh people - one by current communications director Janice Okubo, and another by 1961 local registrar Verna Lee. There are at least 3 BC#’s (including Obama’s) that are known to be on the HDOH’s actual records today that could not have been on those records in 1961 if either of those numbering methods were used. Somebody has to be lying to us about how they numbered the BC#’s AND at least those 3 BC#’s have to have been manipulated by the HDOH itself.
Take that into consideration, as well as the now-proven fact that what they call their 1960-64 birth index was altered to include legally non-valid records, and the actions and claims of the HDOH itself need to be audited even as things stand now. But even moreso if they had 2 conflicting legal claims about Obama’s record (Onaka’s verification that it isn’t legally valid, contrasting with any legally-valid BC that might surface from the HDOH between now and the election).
I think it’s very important that the need for this level of evidence is known up-front, as well as why it is necessary and why some of us have been saying for a couple of years that this is the evidence needed.