Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Video: Bowles explains what the obstacle was for Simpson-Bowles plan (Bottom Line: Obama ignored it)
Hotair ^ | 08/15/2012 | ED MORRISSEY

Posted on 08/15/2012 11:42:55 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Hint: It wasn't extremism from Paul Ryan. Our friend Morgen Richmond goes back to the videotape of the September 2011 talk by Erskine Bowles at the University of North Carolina and finds a direct question from the floor about why the Simpson-Bowles plan went nowhere. After joking that he'd prefer not to answer, Bowles says, "I'll just tell you the truth." And the truth is that, despite delivering and even exceeding what Barack Obama and his economic team said they wanted from the President's own bipartisan advisory commission on deficit reduction and budget reform, Obama refused to champion it:

CLICK ABOVE LINK FOR THE VIDEO

I got a question here from…not one I particularly want to answer but I will. In your view, what was the primary reason why the deficit commission’s plan was not adopted. It’s a great question, I’ll just tell you the truth.

I didn’t know President Obama as well as I knew President Clinton. And one of the primary things in the business world which you learn is: know your client. And so I spent a lot of time with the President and his economic team trying to make sure we defined success. That was really important to me, I had to know what we had to do in order to get something done. And I had a very firm idea of that, and I can tell you the plan we came forward with not only met the criteria he outlined but it exceeded it in many different ways.

So I expected him, you know, to grab hold of it and say: “Wow – this is great!”. That’s what Clinton would have done. He would have said he made it up. And Al would have said he invented it.

But look, you know, I’ve got empirical data that my political antennae are not that great. And since that time the President has come out and said he likes our plan, he thinks it’s good and he’s for it. And hopefully we’ll end up at the right place that we’ll get at least $4 trillion of deficit reduction. And that’s really the key, you know, it’s not when you get it, or if we get it all at once. It’s…to get it. And what we got to do is bring these two parties together. We got to put the politics aside and we got to do what is right. And what is right is to put our fiscal house in order for these kids.

By September 2011, Bowles thought that Obama had come around on his plan and supported it. Yet the actual budget proposal for FY2013 entirely ignored the Simpson-Bowles recommendations a second time, which led to Paul Ryan’s memorable showdown with Tim Geithner this past February.

Bowles was surprised by this turn of events, and his assumption of what Bill Clinton and Al Gore would have done with their budget is both very amusing and probably very true. Clinton would have not hesitated a moment to use the recommendations to seize the high road in the debate over escalating budget deficits. In fact, Clinton did precisely that, seizing credit for a budget-balancing effort that was much more the result of a GOP-controlled Congress than any initiative on Clinton’s part.

Why didn’t Obama seize that initiative? Clearly, deficit control didn’t interest Obama then, and hasn’t since, either. Obama thought he could seize the issue from the Tea Party with the Simpson-Bowles commission and avoid a disastrous outcome in the midterm elections. Once the disaster occurred, though, Obama dropped deficit control as a talking point and instead began shifting back to a class-warfare strategy, blaming the wealthy for the skyrocketing deficits of his own term.

This is what passes for leadership in the Obama era.

Bear this in mind when Obama talks about budget reform and deficit control in this election. In fact, bear this in mind when Obama refuses to seriously discuss budget reform and deficit control in this election.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: debt; deficit; erskinebowles; simpsonbowles
Note to would be parents -- Be careful how you name your children.

Erskine Bowles strikes me as one of those reasonable Democrats, but his name just cries out for a joke (e.g. Irksome Bowels). This is really unfortunate but I just can't help myself....

1 posted on 08/15/2012 11:43:03 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Obama skips debt commission meeting
CNN ^ | Dec. 9, 2010 | Ed Henry
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2640249/posts

Yeah. Barry cares.


2 posted on 08/15/2012 11:55:52 AM PDT by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Obama is nothing more than Al Sharpton with a nice suit, good haircut, and a Hahvaahd dialect.


3 posted on 08/15/2012 12:07:48 PM PDT by RoosterRedux (Obama: "If you've got a business -- you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bowles is a southerner, and before he went off the deep end, even Al Gore would have gone along with his thinking.


4 posted on 08/15/2012 12:23:13 PM PDT by RobbyS (Christus rex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Loose Bowles stink ships..... Obama’s ship.


5 posted on 08/15/2012 12:23:15 PM PDT by Gator113 (***YOU GAVE it to Obama. I would have voted for NEWT.~Just livin' life, my way~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Obama repeatedly demonstrates that he is intellectually lazy ... and not very bright, to boot.

I'd wager he hasn't even read the Simpson-Bowles plan.

The only "bowls" he's had any interest in were those from his college days that were filled with hashish!

6 posted on 08/15/2012 12:25:23 PM PDT by mellow velo (Oxymorons: jumbo shrimp, rap music, liberal think-tank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
So I expected him, you know, to grab hold of it and say: “Wow – this is great!”. That’s what Clinton would have done. He would have said he made it up. And Al would have said he invented it

Funny line. ...all to say we did a great job and Barack wasn't interested in the least.

More proof Obama is intentionally trying to over burden the taxpayer and "Fundamentally Change America" forever.

7 posted on 08/15/2012 12:39:41 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

We The People and the US Congress should be asking and demanding answers to whose behind the Wannabe Dictator and who sealed his records before he was even a candidate.


8 posted on 08/15/2012 2:49:34 PM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mellow velo
"I'd wager he hasn't even read the Simpson-Bowles plan".

Just like "his health plan" written by the dems in congress.

The Kenyan must go.

9 posted on 08/15/2012 2:50:26 PM PDT by ex91B10 (We've tried the Soap Box,the Ballot Box and the Jury Box; ONE BOX LEFT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson