Cities with the worst car theft rates

Insurance.Com ^ | 3 August 2012 | Mark C. Smith

[Vigilanteman]

The odds of having your car stolen are higher in these 10 metropolitan areas. But you can take steps to protect your ride, and they might even earn an insurance discount.

The bad news for California drivers? Your state had the greatest number of hot spots in the country for auto thefts in 2011, according to a National Insurance Crime Bureau report released recently.

[dragnet2]

I see, your all about a glitch on that site. Lets do this, I'll make it easy for you and provide you with additional sources if need be.

BTW these are based on FBI stats, feel free to look it up.

Latest 2006 Crimes per 100,000 People:

	Irving, TX	Los Angeles, CA	National
Murder:	1.5	12.4	7
Forcible Rape:	24.1	27.3	32.2
Robbery:	132.6	370	205.8
Aggravated Assault:	268.7	377.2	336.5
Burglary:	840.6	524.8	813.2
Larceny Theft:	3378.6	1539.2	2601.7
Vehicle Theft:	623.7	654.4	501.5

[dragnet2]

"you are just wrong. L.A. and Irving are apx. the same."

Then after seeing the stats and say:

""Violent crime in Irving is about 1/2 of L.A.""

Then you state:

"Like the man said, there are lies, damned lies and statistics."

I responded: Well, this begs the question, are you denying the stats regarding Irving?

Then ya make this statement:

"Since the question does not contain its own answer, it “begs” nothing.

Now, will ya answer the question?

[freedumb2003]

OK, I will also type this slowly: YOUR posy says (Irvuing in column 1, LA in column 2):

Murder: 1.5 12.4 7
Forcible Rape: 24.1 27.3 32.2
Robbery: 132.6 370 205.8
Aggravated Assault: 268.7 377.2 336.5

Since these are per centemille (per 100,000) Irving has 1/12 the murder rate, 83% (less) of rapes (one less if they come to my door), less than 1/2 of robberies and 71% (again less) of Aggravated assault.

Looks like I traded up. But come by any time and attempt to steal from me. I will give you .15 of lead. Free.

And I suggest you keep working on ESL. Eventually people will think you were born in the USA.

[freedumb2003]

>>Now, will ya answer the question? <<

I strongly suggest you stop trumpeting your ignorance and stupidity.

Really.

It is one thing to be stupid silently. It is quite another to be stupid publicly, And proudly.

[dragnet2]

Lets go with this source, based on FBI stats..

You deny this? This is an easy question, even for you.

Latest 2006 Crimes per 100,000 People:

	Dallas, TX	Los Angeles, CA	National
Murder:	15	12.4	7
Forcible Rape:	53.28	27.3	32.2
Robbery:	553.9	370	205.8
Aggravated Assault:	584.2	377.2	336.5
Burglary:	1734.7	524.8	813.2
Larceny Theft:	4006.4	1539.2	2601.7
Vehicle Theft:	1116	654.4	501.5

[dragnet2]

You've been given multiple sources and were asked if ya wanted more. I answered your evasive questions.

Ya gonna answer mine now?

Or will you continue to evade the question as you dance in circles?

[dragnet2]

Lets make this real simple, and boil this down and see if you will answer this instead of playing Mr. dumb.

Based on FBI stats, is crime in Irving substantially less then LA?

Go ahead...LOL!

[freedumb2003]

Lets make this real simple, and boil this down and see if you will answer this

Your inability to understand simple English continues to be a source of amusement for everyone. Your stupidity cracks me up. Your proud trumpeting of your stupidity is even funnier.

To answer YOUR question (I posed my questions to you in English so that was unfair and I beg your forgiveness): Irving has a significantly lower level of violent crimes than L.A. I even sent you back your data and you were too obtuse ("obtuse"="not quick or alert in perception, feeling, or intellect; not sensitive or observant; dull") to understand my posts.

I await (but not forever -- you have clearly mastered the "straw man" logical fallacy) your reply to my questions.

If I was ignorant like you I could posit "that BEGS the question of what your point is. " Your own data deride your apparent point.

Dumb on facts, dumb on analysis -- do you know how to operate your toothbrush?

You still don't understand and you still stand astride your logical fallacy. But I think the words "logical" and "fallacy" have no meaning to someone whose native tongue is not English.

Est-ce que tu me comprends?

?Entiendes?

καταλαβαίνω?

[dragnet2]

Once again, for all to see, I know why ya wont answer slick.

Lets examine why.

It’s because ya made totally inconsistent statements, which are.

#1.”Irving being approximately like LA” regarding crime.

#2. Then when shown the stats, showing you’re wrong, you agree with them, and then make statements implying the stats are all lies.

#3. Then when asked if you agree with the stats you refuse to answer.

#4. You refused to answer because you were shown Texas major cities like Dallas which you live right next to, have considerably more crime than LA, based on stats. This is AFTER you stated in post 6: “”After 50+ years in So Cal, Texas now as my allegiance. Stew in your liberal juices, So Cal. And your fellow liberal paradises such as Washington””

You agreed with the stats when they suited you, and then implied they were all lies when they didn’t suit you after making really inconsistent comments.

That makes you a major hypocrite and deceiver.

The internet makes a great witness Mr. dumb.

BTW, great monicker, it fits el perfecto!

[dragnet2]

Dallas and Los Angeles Comparative Crime Ratios per 100,000 People

Dallas and Los Angeles Comparative Crime Ratios per 100,000 People

Latest 2006 Crimes per 100,000 People:

	Dallas, TX	Los Angeles, CA	National
Murder:	15	12.4	7
Forcible Rape:	53.28	27.3	32.2
Robbery:	553.9	370	205.8
Aggravated Assault:	584.2	377.2	336.5
Burglary:	1734.7	524.8	813.2
Larceny Theft:	4006.4	1539.2	2601.7
Vehicle Theft:	1116	654.4	501.5

[dragnet2]

LOL!

Deal with it man!

[freedumb2003]

>>#1.”Irving being approximately like LA” regarding crime.<<

I was wrong. Irving is safer than L.A. based on your own data.

>>#2. Then when shown the stats, showing you’re wrong, you agree with them, and then make statements implying the stats are all lies.<<

I said no such thing. The data are correct. Irving is safer than L.A. You are the one who won’t admit to the clear numbers.

>>#3. Then when asked if you agree with the stats you refuse to answer.<<

I have answered. It was in English which is where your problem seems to be. You still don’t understand the simple concept of a logical fallacy. Stupid people like you are that way.

>>#4. You refused to answer because you were shown Texas major cities like Dallas which you live right next to, have considerably more crime than LA, based on stats. This is AFTER you stated in post 6: “”After 50+ years in So Cal, Texas now as my allegiance. Stew in your liberal juices, So Cal. And your fellow liberal paradises such as Washington””<<

I stand behind that quote. I am sure you will be killed in your bed since you can’t arm yourself. As with many liberals of your ilk, you ignored my argument that I am personally safer since I am now armed. But I am familiar with what you and yours try to pass as “argumentation.” Stupid is as stupid posts. And I don’t live in Dallas.

>>You agreed with the stats when they suited you, and then implied they were all lies when they didn’t suit you after making really inconsistent comments.<<

Or not. Look at the thread idiot.

>>That makes you a major hypocrite and deceiver.<<

I note you continue to ignore the fact you don’t even know basic English. I have been crystal clear. Your data indict you, but you are too stupid to even see it.

>>The internet makes a great witness Mr. dumb.<<

Yep— your idiot statements stand as witness to your stupidity,

>>BTW, great monicker, it fits el perfecto!<<

Only a little child without even the smallest understanding of what a moniker means uses it -— another logical fallacy which is is your stock in trade.

You do bedevil me in that I can’t figure out if you are a adolescent child. a troll or just an idiot. None of these are mutually exclusive so I will just stamp you with all 3.

Hint; read your own posts about the numbers, quit ignoring my factual posts that not what a liar you are and learn English.

Sonny boy.

[dragnet2]

LOL!

[dragnet2]

read your own posts about the numbers, quit ignoring my factual posts that not what a liar you are and learn English.

LOL!

[freedumb2003]

>>LOL!<<

That sums it up (but not how you are thinking it does). Tell your mommy you think you won the thread.

[dragnet2]

I understand.

In many cases like yours, it’s typical that facts have a tendency to make people angry, when shown things they really don’t care to see.

Take a deep breath, go have a beer. It’s OK.

[freedumb2003]

>>In many cases like yours, it’s typical that facts have a tendency to make people angry, when shown things they really don’t care to see.<<

I have given you facts — the ones you supplied nonetheless.

We end up with:

1. Your facts support that Irving is a better place to live than L.A. Violent crimes are MUCH fewer here.
2. North Irving is even more safe and you have no stats that say otherwise.
3. English is not your first language. You can’t distinguish between a contention and an assertion.
4. Logic is foreign to you as well. Your repeated use (and even doubling down) of logical fallacies in what to you passes for “argumentation” is humorous in the entry and LOL in the extreme.
5. Your mommy will pull the plug on you soon. I suggest you go back to your Spongebob site before she sees how you are amusing us grown-ups.

[dragnet2]

Well, ya finally admitted you do agree with the stats which was my point from the beginning, which is the major cities in TX, like Dallas and Houston, have *substantially* more per capita crime than LA.

See, that wasn’t so hard was it?

[freedumb2003]

>>Well, ya finally admitted you do agree with the stats which was my point from the beginning, which is the major cities in TX, like Dallas and Houston, have *substantially* more per capita crime than LA.<<

Reading is FUNdamental. Your statistics say the opposite.

>>See, that wasn’t so hard was it?<<

I suggest you take more English lessons. Your grasp is tenuous at best.

[dragnet2]

Well, ya finally admitted you do agree with the stats which was my point from the beginning, which is the major cities in TX, like Dallas and Houston, have *substantially* more per capita crime than LA.

Your statistics say the opposite.

Really?

Latest 2006 Crimes per 100,000 People:

	Dallas, TX	Los Angeles, CA	National
Murder:	15	12.4	7
Forcible Rape:	53.28	27.3	32.2
Robbery:	553.9	370	205.8
Aggravated Assault:	584.2	377.2	336.5
Burglary:	1734.7	524.8	813.2
Larceny Theft:	4006.4	1539.2	2601.7
Vehicle Theft:	1116	654.4	501.5