[freedumb2003]

Lets make this real simple, and boil this down and see if you will answer this

Your inability to understand simple English continues to be a source of amusement for everyone. Your stupidity cracks me up. Your proud trumpeting of your stupidity is even funnier.

To answer YOUR question (I posed my questions to you in English so that was unfair and I beg your forgiveness): Irving has a significantly lower level of violent crimes than L.A. I even sent you back your data and you were too obtuse ("obtuse"="not quick or alert in perception, feeling, or intellect; not sensitive or observant; dull") to understand my posts.

I await (but not forever -- you have clearly mastered the "straw man" logical fallacy) your reply to my questions.

If I was ignorant like you I could posit "that BEGS the question of what your point is. " Your own data deride your apparent point.

Dumb on facts, dumb on analysis -- do you know how to operate your toothbrush?

You still don't understand and you still stand astride your logical fallacy. But I think the words "logical" and "fallacy" have no meaning to someone whose native tongue is not English.

Est-ce que tu me comprends?

?Entiendes?

καταλαβαίνω?

[dragnet2]

Dallas and Los Angeles Comparative Crime Ratios per 100,000 People

Dallas and Los Angeles Comparative Crime Ratios per 100,000 People

Latest 2006 Crimes per 100,000 People:

	Dallas, TX	Los Angeles, CA	National
Murder:	15	12.4	7
Forcible Rape:	53.28	27.3	32.2
Robbery:	553.9	370	205.8
Aggravated Assault:	584.2	377.2	336.5
Burglary:	1734.7	524.8	813.2
Larceny Theft:	4006.4	1539.2	2601.7
Vehicle Theft:	1116	654.4	501.5

[dragnet2]

LOL!

Deal with it man!