Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NFHale

I’m not sure if he made a recent comment, he may have, but I found an instance where he did it in 1994. Is that what this is about?

I don’t approve of it either way, but it sure sheds new light on the subject.

We can’t talk about what Obama did past noon yesterday, and yet we can go back 18 years on Romney.

[ When I say we, I’m referencing the nation at large, the DNCp ]


110 posted on 08/08/2012 1:47:27 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Nope 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne

“...When I say we, I’m referencing the nation at large...”

I understand, D-1.

Here’s my point: Romney says something like this, but doesn’t push a LAW mandating it.

This current POS would, if he thought he could get away with it. He’s laying low because of the flack he took from the black churches over the queer marriage thing. He’s perfectly content with letting Romney take flak for something he himself supports.

People can say what they want about the Dems, but they fight to win this war.

“Our” side just twists with the wind over and over. And it’s getting old...very old.


112 posted on 08/08/2012 1:55:16 PM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson