Skip to comments.
Romney Supports Two-State Solution
Arutz Sheva ^
| 31/7/12
| Elad Benari
Posted on 07/30/2012 4:32:07 PM PDT by Eleutheria5
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
in other words, he doesn't support a two-state solution, just a process towards a two-state solution that will never end, and never begin, because the parties will never agree where to start. That's an improvement, although still not satisfactory.
To: Eleutheria5
“just a process towards a two-state solution that will never end, and never begin, because the parties will never agree where to start. “
A Two-State solution is fine. You have Israel, which speaks for itself, and you have a Palestinian state, in which people are free, no political violence, no hatred towards Jews, Christians, Amish, or anything else that doesn’t fit their narrow template. Kids in the Palestinian State that grow up to respect Israel and understand that Jews are human, just like they are supposed to be.
Silly me...you’re right, where could they start, with pre-conditions like that?
2
posted on
07/30/2012 4:38:31 PM PDT
by
BobL
( It's easy to be a saint when you have nothing on the line)
To: Eleutheria5
The Only Solition is for Israel to Return to her Biblical Boarders.
To: Eleutheria5
Here we go...
kissing up to the Palis...
4
posted on
07/30/2012 4:52:51 PM PDT
by
Tennessee Nana
(Why should I vote for Bishop Romney when he hates me because I am a Christian)
To: Eleutheria5
No; only one party wants a One-State Solution, as in an Islamic State.
5
posted on
07/30/2012 5:02:25 PM PDT
by
Olog-hai
To: Eleutheria5
A two state solution is not possible in practice.... with the Pali’s. Everybody needs to get real about this.
6
posted on
07/30/2012 5:03:31 PM PDT
by
umgud
(No Rats, No Rino's)
To: Eleutheria5
me too... the Israeli's keep the Jewish state and the goathumpers can all move to their state, Gaza...
7
posted on
07/30/2012 5:04:16 PM PDT
by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: Eleutheria5
Dunno, but if the UN offered me and mine a boatload of tax-free real estate near the Mediterranean Sea, I’d take it in a heart beat. These Palis aren’t very bright, are they?
8
posted on
07/30/2012 5:07:06 PM PDT
by
GreatRoad
(O < 0)
To: Tennessee Nana
You’re reading that wrong. Israel supports a two state solution. He’s not chumming it up with the Palis.
In fact, he was very shrewd in that he picked up on the attempt to get him to state the 67 borders where things should wind up. He deftly avoided that, and said the two main parties to this agreement were the ones that would have to determine that. The Leftist media has been trying to get Israel and the West to agree to the 67 border, before anything else is discussed. Hell no.
He’s actually been quite refreshing on Israel. His comments on Jerusalem were perfect. He’s doing better than Obama or Bush. For one thing, he isn’t attacking Israel the way they both did.
“Israel needs to show restraint (who cares if it’s being shelled non-stop from Palestinian territory).”
Bush and Rice used to drive me to distraction with their idiotic statements after Israel was attacked.
Romeny’s approach so far, is what needed to be said to bring both parties back together. Starting from a position of weakness sure didn’t work.
9
posted on
07/30/2012 5:14:27 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Remove all Democrats from the Republican party, and we won't have much Left, just a lot of Right.)
To: GreatRoad
No, they want it all. Can’t they just have it all. Why does Israel have to exist? Can’t Israel just be shoved into the sea? Come on, the Palestinians deserve it. It’s their’s.
This is the even hand the Western press and the Palestinians have been pretending is fair for the last twenty years or more.
10
posted on
07/30/2012 5:19:36 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Remove all Democrats from the Republican party, and we won't have much Left, just a lot of Right.)
To: Uncle Slayton
So how is that going to be accomplished? Where are all the millions of Greeks, Turks, Kurds, and Arabs going to go?
I’m not sure many Israelis would advocate such maximalist claims, except for the most militant of the religious parties. After all the negotiation process has already allowed them to consolidate territories in the West Bank around settlements.
11
posted on
07/30/2012 5:29:18 PM PDT
by
Shadow44
To: DoughtyOne
This is what i read...
“Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney supports a two-state solution to solve the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Authority, he told CNN during his visit to Jerusalem.”
But if there is a two-state solution there would be a divided Jerusalem...
and it wouldnt be the capital...
It could be that Willard just said what sounded good while he was in Israel...
After all he was there to collect tribute money..
IF he ever got the White House it wouldnt be long thereafter when his true policy towards the Jews was known...
The Palis would force his hand and Willard would back down...
In 2008 he said he wouldnt have any Moslems in his cabinet/administration because the Moslems were too small a % of population in the US...whatever that meant...
Well theres a whole lot more of them now...
Be interesting to see what he would do...
Purely for the entertainment value...
(I’ll also be counting the women and blacks but that a different story)
12
posted on
07/30/2012 5:42:12 PM PDT
by
Tennessee Nana
(Why should I vote for Bishop Romney when he hates me because I am a Christian)
To: Tennessee Nana
Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney supports a two-state solution to solve the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Authority, he told CNN during his visit to Jerusalem.
I believe in a two state solutions also. The first state created out of the Palestinian mandate (Trans-Jordan..now Jordan) and the current Israeli state composed of Israel proper and the West Bank. Gaza can hang out as a Hamas island all it wants, until it is reabsorbed by Egypt.
13
posted on
07/30/2012 5:58:57 PM PDT
by
Yulee
(Village of Albion)
To: Olog-hai
The covenant establishing the PLO calls for a one state solution that includes all of the original Palestinian Mandate.
This has never been changed.
The problem is that no one was ever called Palestinians except the Jewish settlers until 1967, when magically all Arabs living in the area, who had always insisted they were Arabs began calling themselves Palestinians. This didn't happen until they got their lunch handed to them in the 1967 war.
The Palestinians are a made up people according to their own leadership.
14
posted on
07/30/2012 6:05:58 PM PDT
by
Yulee
(Village of Albion)
To: Yulee
The Palis used to live in Jordan years ago but the King of Jordan kicked them out,,,
15
posted on
07/30/2012 6:51:48 PM PDT
by
Tennessee Nana
(Why should I vote for Bishop Romney when he hates me because I am a Christian)
To: Eleutheria5
Red states and blue states? That would be awesome!
What? You say he’s talking about Israel and Palestine? Oh well, there’s goes that idea.
16
posted on
07/30/2012 6:51:59 PM PDT
by
coloradan
(The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
To: Yulee
Indeed Zuheir Mohsen’s admission is lost on the liberals, who have been trying to suppress it for decades. Even worse, pan-Arabism is based on the Nazi notion of pan-Germanism, just as Nasserism and Ba’athism is based on national socialism.
17
posted on
07/30/2012 7:18:23 PM PDT
by
Olog-hai
To: coloradan
My thought too. Freedom for the peace-loving peoples of the United Red States of America! Maybe “one country, two systems”? (like HK/China)
18
posted on
07/30/2012 8:35:25 PM PDT
by
Vide
To: Eleutheria5
Someone needs to post a face palm.
Why does it seems for every three steps forward, this idiot Romney takes two steps back.
He’s sometimes just as stupid as Paula Abdul.
19
posted on
07/30/2012 8:43:29 PM PDT
by
Fledermaus
(Democrats are dangerous and evil. Republicans are useless and useful idiots.)
To: Tennessee Nana
This is what i read...
Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney supports a two-state solution to solve the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Authority, he told CNN during his visit to Jerusalem.
But if there is a two-state solution there would be a divided Jerusalem... Romney didn't say this. This is what the Palestinian leader said. Romney didn't buy into it. He stated that Jerusalem was the capital of Israel, and didn't deviate or expand on that. He said it twice while he was over there.
and it wouldnt be the capital... He didn't say this either.
It could be that Willard just said what sounded good while he was in Israel... Yes, that could be. We have no evidence of that yet, but I've adopted that theory on a number of his statements. We'll see if this is one of those times. It may be. We can't say for sure though.
After all he was there to collect tribute money... Perhaps. It's my take he's trying to embellish his international stature. It was a wise move to do this.
IF he ever got the White House it wouldn't be long thereafter when his true policy towards the Jews was known... You do mean Israel don't you?
The Palis would force his hand and Willard would back down... Look, we can make all sorts of assumptions. Some of them may be very accurate. We don't know until it happens. It may happen. It may not. Frankly, I like what he's had to say so far with regard to Israel. If the guy goes over there and says something wrong, we trash him. If he goes over there and says the right things, we trash him too. Look, I'm not voting for the guy. I've made my mind up and that's it. That doesn't prevent me from listening to him and giving him kudos if he's saying the right things.
In 2008 he said he wouldn't have any Moslems in his cabinet/administration because the Moslems were too small a % of population in the US...whatever that meant... Yeah, that's kind of a strange way to address it, based on percentages. It's the right move IMO, but man up and explain why.
Well theres a whole lot more of them now... Yes there are. And I'm not inclined to think there should be a one in the White House. Sorry, but we're essentially on a war footing with those folks. It's too big a chance to take.
Be interesting to see what he would do... Yes it will.
Purely for the entertainment value... Well, I'd go beyond that and state it would interesting based on national security concerns.
(Ill also be counting the women and blacks but that a different story) Aw come on, don't you think we need another Maggie Williams in there. /s
Thanks for the additional comments. Take care.
20
posted on
07/30/2012 10:23:01 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Remove all Democrats from the Republican party, and we won't have much Left, just a lot of Right.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson