1 posted on
07/30/2012 8:14:56 AM PDT by
Justaham
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: Justaham
The woman is a waste...as is her vapid dork hubby.
And folks still have the audacity to pick on Sarah, who has twice the IQ and multiple times the morality of either of the Obamaloon pretenders.
2 posted on
07/30/2012 8:18:48 AM PDT by
Da Coyote
To: Justaham
FROM THE ARTICLE: Political commentators have taken issue with the fact that the design ‘cost more than the average American family makes in a month’
First of all, I would venture to guess that it cost more than the average American family makes in 2-3 months, at least. Secondly, I could make a copy of that for $15 or less.
3 posted on
07/30/2012 8:22:23 AM PDT by
NEMDF
To: Justaham
Moochelle Ubamugabe.
4 posted on
07/30/2012 8:22:32 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Government is the religion of the sociopath.)
To: Justaham
The US “news” media will be right on this. As soon as they dig up how much Laura Bush spent on clothes as First Lady so they can show comparisons. You know, gotta’ be “in context”!
6 posted on
07/30/2012 8:23:28 AM PDT by
jeffc
(Welcome to the United Socialist States of America)
To: Justaham
France had Marie Antoinette and America has Michele Obama.
7 posted on
07/30/2012 8:23:52 AM PDT by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
To: Justaham
This must be the first time she’s ever been proud of her wardrobe.
To: Justaham
Typical left wing scrounge. She's scrounging up as many freebies as she can get her hands on while the going is good. This woman has no class.
You can take the Obomas out of the Chicago ghetto, but you can't take the Chicago ghetto out of the Obomas.
To: Justaham
Michelle Obama wore a jacket worth $6,800 to the pre-Olympics Opening Ceremony.....
Yea, she bought it at Target....
To: Justaham
> ... she elected to spend so much money on a garment while so
> many in the U.S. are suffering financially.
Let them eat cake.
14 posted on
07/30/2012 8:30:27 AM PDT by
Westbrook
(Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
To: Justaham
...make...purse...sow’s ear...
15 posted on
07/30/2012 8:31:11 AM PDT by
econjack
(Some people are as dumb as soup.)
To: Justaham
Look! Are we socialist, like them. They hipocrits we know that. As long as it was her money or Obamas pay check, I don’t have a problem with how they spend thier money, even though it may be tacky and hipocritical. Attacking someone on something so superficial as how they dress or what it costs invites our enemys to judge us as we judge them!
17 posted on
07/30/2012 8:32:11 AM PDT by
qman
(The communist usurper must go!)
To: Justaham
Look! Are we socialist, like them. There hypocrites we know that. As long as it was her money or Obamas pay check, I don't have a problem with how they spend their money, even though it may be tacky and hypocritical. Attacking someone on something so superficial as how they dress or what it costs invites our enemy's to judge us as we judge them!
19 posted on
07/30/2012 8:34:14 AM PDT by
qman
(The communist usurper must go!)
To: Justaham
She wore a $68,000 jacket!
(Just doing my Bill O'Reily imitation!)
21 posted on
07/30/2012 8:35:10 AM PDT by
Redleg Duke
("Madison, Wisconsin is 30 square miles surrounded by reality.", L. S. Dryfus)
To: Justaham
I realize that this is going to be disliked by most of our readers.
As much as I dislike the current administration and the way they are destroying this great country I would still prefer that our leaders (yes, unfortunately she is considered a leader by some people in the world) are at least well dressed.
In fact it is an even bet that the designer either loaned her the jacket or gave it to her.
Anyway I would prefer her to look at least like she is trying to look nice than see her representing this country dressed in sack cloth.
24 posted on
07/30/2012 8:40:17 AM PDT by
jdietz
(God is great, beer is good and people are crazy, (which is why guns are necessary))
To: Justaham
“The jacket, which was almost armour-like in style”
Heh, the first thing I thought of when I saw it was “that looks like a medieval tabard.”
As for the cost of the garment...if someone wanted to spend their own money on it, tough beans to anyone who didn’t. like it. Of course, it was probably not paid for with personal money, but the taxpayer-funded 1st Lady Budget (or whatever you call it). So, yeah, more of the same from this administration.
25 posted on
07/30/2012 8:42:16 AM PDT by
DemforBush
(Ever notice we never see Mayor Bloomberg and Louis XIV at the same time?)
To: Justaham
![](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v253/chode6/chode2.gif)
and she STILL looked like a silly fat cow...
27 posted on
07/30/2012 8:45:05 AM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: Justaham
"...are furious that she elected to spend so much money..."
Ok, everyone who believes that Moochie actually spent her own money on this, raise your hand...
(sound of crickets chirping...)
28 posted on
07/30/2012 8:45:16 AM PDT by
frankenMonkey
(will do graphics for food...)
To: Justaham
I remember when the Left Wing MSM went bonkers because Nanct Reagan bought new china for the WH even though it was paid for by private funds
33 posted on
07/30/2012 9:07:45 AM PDT by
uncbob
To: Justaham
You can wrap a ______ in foil, but it doesn’t make it a Hershey bar.
37 posted on
07/30/2012 9:15:35 AM PDT by
SampleMan
(Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
To: Justaham
Again we have to look for Non-US media to actually report on this stuff.
40 posted on
07/30/2012 9:31:51 AM PDT by
rod1
(CTLY)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson