Skip to comments.
Obama blamed for failure of international arms treaty ('stunning cowardice')
The Hill ^
| 7/27/12
| Julian Pecquet
Posted on 07/28/2012 12:51:24 AM PDT by Libloather
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
the export of deadly weapons to rogue regimes
Hussein may need that now and again.
To: Libloather
a tremendous loss for thousands of innocent civilians around the globe who die each year from armed violence fueled by the unregulated transfer of arms. somebody needs to transfer some arms to those innocent civillians.
2
posted on
07/28/2012 1:10:41 AM PDT
by
RC one
(this space intentionally left blank)
To: Libloather
Re “stunning cowardice”, I can only guess that Obama was on the same page with the Kumbaya crowd, as they saw it, but is now suddenly feeling the electoral heat from the gun toting right, and doesn’t want to take a stand.
3
posted on
07/28/2012 1:12:43 AM PDT
by
dr_lew
To: Libloather
Hussein certainly wants to confiscate Americans’ guns, and this treaty was designed to enable that. But there are still too many IslamoNazis around the world who may need arms from Hussein.
Hussein is every bit as evil as Hitler or Stalin—but they didn’t have to contend with the internet or talk radio, or, most important of all, an armed population. I am hopeful that Hussein, though he wants to destroy the U.S. and inundate it with Third World hordes, is just too stupid, lazy, and incompetent to get the job done before November 6th.
4
posted on
07/28/2012 1:24:24 AM PDT
by
Arthur McGowan
(In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
To: Libloather
It will be Bush’s or Mitts fault!
5
posted on
07/28/2012 1:27:17 AM PDT
by
NoLibZone
(I am with: Sarah, Bachmann, Santorum, Herman Cain, Dick Cheney, W, Rush on Mitt in 2012)
To: Libloather
Proponents of the treaty, which include the National Association of Evangelicals, say there is nothing in the treaty that is incompatible with Second Amendment gun rights.
6
posted on
07/28/2012 1:38:31 AM PDT
by
SECURE AMERICA
(Where can I sign up for the New American Revolution and the Crusades 2012?)
To: Libloather
(Proponents of the treaty, which include the National Association of Evangelicals, say there is nothing in the treaty that is incompatible with Second Amendment gun rights.)
If they believe that they had better re-read the US Constitution.
7
posted on
07/28/2012 1:39:35 AM PDT
by
SECURE AMERICA
(Where can I sign up for the New American Revolution and the Crusades 2012?)
To: Libloather
Dear Julian Pecquet, given the sheer amount of blaming that ObamaIdiot and his merry goons of suppoerters have issed in the past 4 years, I call it karma that he is now being blamed for something.... =.=
8
posted on
07/28/2012 2:00:47 AM PDT
by
cranked
To: Libloather
this will be brought back up within weeks
9
posted on
07/28/2012 2:01:06 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
To: SECURE AMERICA
then they are morons if they truly believe that
10
posted on
07/28/2012 2:02:10 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
To: GeronL
September. The committee lead said they would be back in September and they *would* have a treaty in 2012.
We have a breather, nothing more.
11
posted on
07/28/2012 2:05:26 AM PDT
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: GeronL
It is only delayed until after the election so that he can arm-twist Senators...
12
posted on
07/28/2012 2:32:14 AM PDT
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Spktyr
there’s still the other Treaty deal in the works that would affect families with children and the disabled...
13
posted on
07/28/2012 2:38:32 AM PDT
by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
To: piasa
I think the gun treaty was proposed to draw attention off of this other treaty.
14
posted on
07/28/2012 2:39:49 AM PDT
by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
To: Libloather
“a treaty to regulate the export of deadly weapons to rogue regimes “?
This is a horsecrap statement. The treaty was meant to take away citizens right to have and transfer small arms and to enable governments to be more able to make their citizens subjects.
15
posted on
07/28/2012 3:28:43 AM PDT
by
Joe Boucher
((FUBO) Hey Mitt, F-you too pal)
To: Joe Boucher
To make radical changes to our system ( which they have a plan in motion as we can all see) they need to know we cannot come back at them. This is what it's all about. Disarm the public and you now have total control with no chance of serious reprisals when thier utopian society is put into effect. It is not over and we must be diligent and never go back to sleep again
To: Libloather
Proponents of the treaty..say there is nothing in the treaty that is incompatible with Second Amendment gun rights. There is also nothing in the Constitution that allows a pResident to ignore Immigration law but we see how that is working out.
17
posted on
07/28/2012 3:44:09 AM PDT
by
Feckless
(I was trained by the US << This Tagline Censored by FR >> ain't that irOnic?)
To: SECURE AMERICA
Even being apart of an organization like the UN is in and of itself unconstitutionsl. Get U.S. Out of the United Nations!
18
posted on
07/28/2012 3:56:16 AM PDT
by
MachIV
To: Libloather
It is more than possible Obama does not not need another arrow in the quiver of his enemies. After his gigantic screw-up with his “you didn’t build that”, his precarious position in the polls is guiding his decisions. If he signs the UN treaty, he will certainly lose a lot of Dems who are for gun rights.
To: GeronL
Within seconds of his next Inauguration.
20
posted on
07/28/2012 4:12:13 AM PDT
by
Venturer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson