The author should be ashamed.
She calles it “patently false”, but then quotes Romney as saying he wants the bust returned to the OVAL OFFICE, not the “White House”.
Which is it?
Even this reporter-ette can’t figure it out.
It's a beautiful thing.
The Telegraph, February 14 2009 (Valentine's day!)
Hmm Ive read articles explaining it was “on loan” to us but that Obama returned it to England. At the very least he took it out of the oval office, we shall see.
it depends on what the definition of “is” is . . .
I have noticed that a lot of articles at Politico no longer accept comments . . . gee, I wonder why the liars have done that.
Dose the nice Democrapic “presstitute” have a rationalization for the infamous “Ghetto Gift” Hussein gave the Queen of England?
Dan Pfeiffer, now which Obamugabe buttkisser is he? Is he the one that walks around with the industrial strength knee pads on? Or does he crawl around on all fours and pant after Obamugabe?
It is rumored that one of his slaves retrieved it from a septic tank where Obama instructed it be placed, cleaned it up, and put it back on display.
More cheap shameless politics from the Obama administration.
Politico lies all the time, since they’re leftists.
There are two busts .One WAS sent back and the other was confirmed from the White house Curator office.Obama is lying.
She offers no quote that Romney said anything but returning the Churchill bust to the Oval Office, a place where even the White House spokesperson says it is not. Since Romney is not Charles Krauthammer, her specifics do not meet the facts. Thus this reportage is not worth this reporter's probity, which is good since she has none if she considers this story accurate.
It’s just a figure of speech.
Dems are well aware of that, right?
So, four years later they finally come up with ‘this is not true.’ Before which they said nothing.
Waiting to tell the Truth until the election? I doubt it. Suddenly realized that it made them look like marxists and would be used by the Repubs? Maybe.
The British have reported that the Bust referred to in the article was indeed returned and that the bust displayed for Cameron's 2010 visit was a DIFFERENT bust that the White House has had since the 1960s.
Credit to Freeper JoeDetweiler for digging this up.
They think we forgot...