Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Syrian Rebels Threaten To Attack Russian Naval Base
DNA ^ | July 26, 2012

Posted on 07/26/2012 5:19:10 AM PDT by Fennie

Syrian rebels have threatened to attack Russia's naval base at the port of Tartous if Moscow continues to supply weapons to President Bashar al-Assad's regime.

"We have a warning for the Russian forces: if they will send any more weapons that kill our families and the Syrian people we will hit them hard inside Syria," said Louay al-Mokdad, a logistical coordinator for the Free Syrian Army (FSA).

"Informers inside the regime are telling that us that there is a big weapons shipment arriving at Tartous in the next two weeks. We don't want to attack the port, we are not terrorists, but if they keep acting like this we will have no choice."

(Excerpt) Read more at dnaindia.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: assad; russia; syria
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: Netz

“The Russkies will make mincemeat out of the Mad Muslims!”

The Russians have their own mad muslim problem and have struggled for decades to contain it. And while mincing may yet occur, a walk in the park is far from assured.


21 posted on 07/26/2012 9:48:59 AM PDT by Owl558 ("Those who remember George Satayana are doomed to repeat him")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

GO RUSSIA GO!

Now if they will only hit Iran too.


22 posted on 07/26/2012 9:56:39 AM PDT by TomasUSMC ( FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie
"Informers inside the regime are telling that us that there is a big weapons shipment arriving at Tartous in the next two weeks. We don't want to attack the port, we are not terrorists, but if they keep acting like this we will have no choice."

That is probably what the Russians are provoking.

Take a look at a map. Tartous Naval base is "just up the street" from Isral. Only 140 miles.

If the Russians want to prevent a successful attack on Iran's nuke facilities at Natanz it can sit right there and monitor every aircraft and radio transmission from that base.

If a suspicious flight takes off in Israel and starts a potential route that could lead to Iran the Russians can immediately detect it.

A north route will take them right by the Tartous base.

A central or southern route could be tracked as well, long enough to determine the likely destination (Iran). The shorter southern route will probably be off the table, given the current "nature" of our present administration.

A launch of Israel Jericho III land-based long range ballistic missiles would be immediately detected as well.

An attack on Tartous would play right into the Russians hands. They rekindled their effort to upgrade the base in 2009, about the same time the Iran nuclear threat became valid. Such an attack would provide them the "defense" excuse in that theater to do anything they like.

.

23 posted on 07/26/2012 10:11:20 AM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

yea attacking the Russian worked so well for the Chechans too.

These rebels are idiots just like in Libya, and we have our Govt dfending and helping them .


24 posted on 07/26/2012 10:13:06 AM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes

I also remember seeing some INTELSAT pics on a website of a supposed Russian Spetsnaz convoy, heavily-loaded and well-guarded, leaving Baghdad and headed toward the Bekaa Valley area. I didn’t save them and they were scrubbed. Dammit.


25 posted on 07/26/2012 10:38:39 AM PDT by Carriage Hill (All libs and most dems think that life is just a sponge bath, with a happy ending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: varon

“So, at what point do Russians gain ownership? ‘

On November 7 when Obama is reelected.


26 posted on 07/26/2012 10:57:26 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (ABO 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TLI

“——the Russians can immediately detect it “——I’m throwing the “maybe “ flag on that. They are either not that good or are trying real hard to appear neutral. they obviously didn’t pass any clues to Basher when the ‘Raelis took out the Syrian nuke project up the Euphrates.

Lavrov knows he can’t send any russian troops on the ground outside that naval base. The want that base intact too much to get aggressive with whoever is running Syria. Lavrov knows the base is a sitting russian duck and is being just as polite as he can be where it’s concerned.


27 posted on 07/26/2012 11:37:06 AM PDT by cherokee1 (skip the names---just kick the buttz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TLI

Israelis have subs don’t they?


28 posted on 07/26/2012 11:49:59 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: cherokee1
They are either not that good or are trying real hard to appear neutral. they obviously didn’t pass any clues to Basher when the ‘Raelis took out the Syrian nuke project up the Euphrates.

The 2007 attack during which Syrian AA radar networks seemed blinded.

The general situation in that area has changed significantly since 2007.

They have not forgotten what happened.

They are upgrading.

Earlier this month, the Kremlin made clear that it would fulfill its "contractual obligations" and continue to supply Syria with arms and military hardware, including anti-aircraft systems.

http://www.dnaindia.com/world/report_syrian-rebels-threaten-to-attack-russian-naval-base_1719887

see last paragraph.

Gotta have training for the operators. Gotta have observers for the training. Gotta have some protection for the trainers and observers. Gotta have "inspectors" for the military hardware. Gotta have "support staff" for all of the above. They can not do all that on the base.

I'm telling you, there is a big fat commie rat crawling all over this.

Given the butt-kisser-in-Chief in the White House will totally support the Russians "defending Russian citizens in the area" and his tenure as President is appearing to be ended, the Russians will push as much hardware in there as possible and finalize as many "contracts" as possible over the next six months.

.

29 posted on 07/26/2012 12:57:44 PM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

Comment #30 Removed by Moderator

To: Fennie
Russian Warships Will Not Enter Syria Port – Navy Chief

MOSCOW, July 26 (RIA Novosti) – Russia’s navy chief said on Thursday that a flotilla of Russian warships off the coast of Syria would not dock at a port leased by Moscow in the violence-stricken Middle East country.

“The joint fleet flotilla will not enter the port of Tartus,” Vice Admiral Viktor Chirkov told journalists. “It is carrying out military drills in the Mediterranean.” The flotilla is comprised of 10 warships, plus escort vessels. Chirkov also said the flotilla was carrying marines.

RIA link - Russian Warships Will Not Enter Syria Port


31 posted on 07/26/2012 2:17:17 PM PDT by Tommyjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes

I remember right after the second Gulf war started there was a report about one of the suspected WMD sites being radioactive. Never saw a follow up to that one.


32 posted on 07/26/2012 2:29:24 PM PDT by TBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Fennie
The Baltic and Northern Fleet elements of the Russian Navy Task Force entered the Mediterranean a few days ago.

Baltic Fleet Tanker Lena is currently hove to off Morocco. Tanker Lena sends weather every six hours via Morse Code. Positional information from the international weather transmission.

8345 Kilohertz

RMP = Baltic Fleet HQ Kaliningrad

RKO81 = Tanker Lena

RMP DE RKO81 26181 99354 70043 22200

35.4N 04.3W Hove to

Map Link for Russian Navy vessel position

33 posted on 07/26/2012 2:35:05 PM PDT by Tommyjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBall
Radioactive material in Iraq was removed by the US during 2004. Low grade radioactive material was still in holding areas that were being monitored by IAEA and UN inspectors up until Saddam threw the international inspectors out.

News report of transport flights

Iraq Survey Group link

34 posted on 07/26/2012 3:01:24 PM PDT by Tommyjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

There are two countries that you do not want to mess with, Russia is one of them and China is the other. Both these nations will think of nothing to attack, even if it means losing over a million troops in the process.


35 posted on 07/26/2012 3:42:07 PM PDT by LukeL (Barack Obama: Jimmy Carter 2 Electric Boogaloo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie
The Russians know how to deal with terrorist. Would not recommend intervention against them specifically. The video below is a little to artsy for me, but the point is made well.

Russian marine vs Somalia pirates

36 posted on 07/26/2012 4:37:39 PM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cunning_fish
Isn’t it too tricky to move a WMD program this way?

By the time Iraq War #2 was just a few months away, Saddam's massive WMD program was in shambles. We bombed facilities during Gulf War 1 and the UN spent years destroying tons of WMD products after War #1. All that was left officially prior to Gulf War 2, was the WMD that Saddam had reported possessing that the UN had not documented being destroyed. And of course whatever Saddam had never reported possessing. For example - He never reported his secret nuclear program in Libya that Gaddafi gave up. So what was left, could have been taken out in a few truck convoys. The rest was just scattered remains that US troops discovered. They reported those discoveries and UNSCOM came in to clean them up. What UNSCOM found, was never used to determine if all had been destroyed prior to Gulf War 2. Thus, the left believed a lie hatched from the UN. No WMD found.

Now UN/NATO finds itself in a horrific position. They have promoted an invasion of Syria, knowing full well the vast quantities of WMD that Assad has under his control. What was horrific is that Assad could launch WMD at Turkish and Jordanian cities at will. He just announced he will do that if invaded. The UN/NATO policy would have and still can kill thousands of citizens horrifically.

37 posted on 07/26/2012 4:55:55 PM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

That’s a good idea. They should refuse to listen to the diplomats of the world (who work only for their favored, multi-partisan, globalist constituents) and do it.


38 posted on 07/26/2012 5:24:07 PM PDT by familyop ("Wanna cigarette? You're never too young to start." --Deacon, "Waterworld")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape
The UN/NATO's policy is to do nothing without Russian and Chinese permission. So that's what they're doing. Nothing.

In fact Russia is to blame for whatever Assad does because they supported him. Russia propped up his brutal genocidal regime and assisted him in massacring his own people. This was not a wise policy, but a stupid one and they have ensured that Assad will now be overthrown. When Assad falls it will be Russia's fault. Whatever happens to his WMD will be the fault and responsibility of the stupid and evil psychopathic foreign policy of the impotent incompetent corrupt Kremlin.

39 posted on 07/26/2012 5:36:05 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Agree that Assad is Russia's problem. Just as Saddam was our problem. The Russians are trying to control him. Sure would have been nice for DC to condemn their Rebels terrorist bombing attack.

Russia warns Syria against using chemical weapons

The Russian Foreign Ministry said Syria in 1968 had ratified a 1925 international protocol that bars the use of poison gases as a method of warfare.

"The Russian side proceeds from the assumption that Syrian authorities will continue to strictly adhere to the undertaken international obligations," it said in a statement.

40 posted on 07/26/2012 6:20:06 PM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson