Posted on 07/25/2012 7:08:16 PM PDT by i88schwartz
I, like most Americans, believe that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual the right to bear arms," President Obama said at the National Urban League convention in New Orleans. "I think we recognize the traditions of gun ownership that passed on from generation to generation. That hunting and shooting are a cherished national heritage."
"But I also believe that a lot of gun owners would agree that AK-47s belong in the hands of soldiers, not in the hands of criminals. That they belong on the battlefield of war, not on the streets of our cities," Obama said Wednesday night.
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
Well, it’s worked in the past, why not now?
Would you please share that list with us?
Well, it’s worked in the past, why not now?
Would you please share that list with us?
“But I also believe that a lot of gun owners would agree that AK-47s belong in the hands of soldiers, not in the hands of criminal
I saw what you did there, Barry, you worthless piece of filth.
Nobody’s arguing about the appropriateness of guns in the hands of criminals. What about peaceable citizens, Barry Hussein? Do you believe that “AK-47s” (could you identify one, if you saw it?) belong in the hands of peaceable citizens? US Constitution says “yes”. How ‘bout you, Barry?”
You touched on the meaning of Obozo’s statement. What he was saying, is anyone who is not a soldier is a criminal!
If you want some guns banned then by your own admission you DO NOT support The 2nd Amendment. Perhaps you don’t understand what it means. I’d suggest you study up a bit and come back when you’ve gained knowledge of the facts.
And, as another poster asked....how about a list of what you’d like banned, and more importantly.....WHY.
Yeah, and who’s Soldiers???? UN??
Exactly, Winchester, Remington, Marlin and others sell 30 caliber rifles with 5 and 6 round capability.
Any trained troop knows the bang bang bang is preferred over ratatattattattat. Even on auto, it's only a 3 round burst.
The idea of an infantry rifle is a well aimed round.
But I also believe that a lot of gun owners would agree that AK-47s belong in the hands of soldiers, not in the hands of criminals.
So Obama believes that Mexican Drug dealers are “Soldiers”.
And so does Eric “Fast and Furrious” Holder.
1,500 AK47-bearing Mohawks are civilians but can go on the warpath very fast
my Ruger 10/22 can do as much damage as anything.
Somebody clue Barry the constitutional law professor in that the 2nd ammendment isn’t about hunting.
How many citizens of Syria believe soldiers should be the only ones with AK 47’s
I believe the civilians of this country, to defend against tyrants, have the dual role of militia.
You have to be a big thumper, then. I have problems concealing a small .380. I'm not a big guy.
/johnny
It's becoming time to shrug off some of the crap that's been piled on for the last 100 years.
/johnny
Those aren’t HIS enemies, though. I believe the choice was no accident.
“Yeah, and who’s Soldiers???? UN??”
Would seem that way, eh?
“I hear ya. They’re quite accessible. I have magazines loaded for each weapon. The only concession to safety is to not have the magazines inserted in those rifles. I am well practiced in loading them and shooting them, of course. However, my pistols are loaded and ready to go. Funny that you should mention not concealing the ak pistol... I could do that lawfully and dimensionally if I wanted...”
Ha ha....yup. kind of like concealing a pistol grip mossy 500..right down the back under an outback slicker..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
