I think that’s an admirable suggestion. Let me explain why I don’t like the idea.
1. The perps get notoriety
2. It gives other idiots ideas
3. The grieving families have the despicable story out there being told in disgusting intimate full (HD Video) detail, replayed for decades on end - They would be reminded constantly of their loss every time the movie was advertised, people talked about it, or people knowing you had a relative killed there, would want to ask you how it all affected you (for the 10,993rd time).
4. People make a profit off the process
5. I couldn’t take one dime off something related to my relative’s death
6. No amount of money would be worth my loved one’s death
7. No amount of money would make their loss less painful
Take care...
No law that would pass the 1st amendment challenge would possibly be able to put a lid on it, so the only thing left is to make lemonade out of the lemon. This is hardly the only atrocity suffered by American victims that has had media produced about it. And it is S.O.P. to deny a convicted criminal (note the shooter hasn’t been convicted yet) the rights to profit off accounts of his or her crime.