Skip to comments.
BREAKING NEWS: UN Arms Trade Treaty – Full Proposed Document
International Association for the Protection of Civilian Arms Rights ^
Posted on 07/25/2012 11:19:05 AM PDT by Neil E. Wright
PREAMBLE
The States Parties to this Treaty.
- Guided by the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations.
- Recalling that the charter of the UN promotes the establishment and maintenance of international peace and security with the least diversion for armaments of the worlds human and economic resources;
- Reaffirming the obligation of all State Parties to settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered, in accordance with the Charter of the UN;
- Underlining the need to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit trade of conventional arms and to prevent their diversion to illegal and unauthorized end use, such as terrorism and organized crime;
- Recognizing the legitimate political, security, economic and commercial rights and interests of States in the international trade of conventional arms;
- Reaffirming the sovereign right and responsibility of any State to regulate and control transfers of conventional arms that take place exclusively within its territory pursuant to its own legal or constitutional systems;
- Recognizing that development, human rights and peace and security, which are three pillars of the United Nations, are interlinked and mutually reinforcing.
- Recalling the United Nations Disarmament Commission guidelines on international arms transfers adopted by the General Assembly;
- Noting the contribution made by the 2001 UN Programme of Action to preventing combating and eradicating the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons in all its aspects, as well as the 2001 Protocol against the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in Firearms, their parts and components and ammunition, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime;
- Recognizing the security, social, economic and humanitarian consequences of the illicit trade in and unregulated trade of conventional arms;
- Recognizing the challenges faced by victims of armed conflict and their need for adequate care, rehabilitation and social and economic inclusion;
(Excerpt) Read more at iapcar.org ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: 2012; att; banglist; guncontrol; treaty; un; unitednations; youwillnotdisarmus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 181-183 next last
To: Neil E. Wright; All
“Recognizing the legitimate international trade and lawful private ownership and use of conventional arms exclusively for, inter alia, recreational, cultural, historical and sporting activities for States where such ownership and use are permitted or protected by law;”
I notice that “self defense” and “resisting tyranny” and “freedom from dictators” is somehow missing. A typo, you think?
I imagine that under this interpretation an “assault weapon” as defined in the AWB would be unsuitable for recreation, sporting, historical or cultural uses.
Maybe we could use the Declaration of Independence as cultural justification for owning military-style guns?
101
posted on
07/25/2012 2:56:31 PM PDT
by
DBrow
To: napscoordinator
The Supreme Court wasn’t supposed to allow McCain-Feingold or Obamacare, either, and look what happened.
The government doesn’t have the right to even TRY to build a gun registry. “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Clear as day.
}:-)4
102
posted on
07/25/2012 3:18:55 PM PDT
by
Moose4
(...and walk away.)
To: y'all
103
posted on
07/25/2012 3:41:42 PM PDT
by
deks
("...the battle of our time is the battle of liberty against the overreach of the federal government")
To: Neil E. Wright
105
posted on
07/25/2012 4:01:37 PM PDT
by
combat_boots
(The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
106
posted on
07/25/2012 4:36:09 PM PDT
by
PMAS
To: Neil E. Wright
Meanwhile Syria burns and Iran builds nukes...............
107
posted on
07/25/2012 4:48:56 PM PDT
by
Tzimisce
(THIS SUCKS)
To: Neil E. Wright
Neil I despise the united nations and the polidiots that fuel it..... Doom on em all.
Letters to all my gun links (see my home page here at fr). Letters to all my congress critters. Voting with my dollars between elections .
Stay safe Neil !
To: y'all
Sculpture entitled "Non-Violence" at UN Headquarters in New York.
109
posted on
07/25/2012 6:03:10 PM PDT
by
deks
("...the battle of our time is the battle of liberty against the overreach of the federal government")
To: napscoordinator; Joe Brower; marktwain; MestaMachine; CodeToad
In every case, mass murder by govt genocide was preceded by gun confiscation which was preceded by gun registration.
ABC, 123.
You do not get to point a gun at my head and say, “But I promise not to pull the trigger. Really, it’s cool. Just forget it’s there.”
Sorry, you do not get to do that. You cannot say, “But the Canadian govt has not exterminated anybody.” Nope, sorry, not here, not now, and especially not by the gangster govt Obama/Holder junta now in DC. It is a bloody red line in the sand. Blood would be shed over such principles. Senators would be self-branding TRAITOR on their faces. Mark my words.
110
posted on
07/25/2012 6:24:36 PM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: rurgan
There's nothing in this treaty that allows for state sovereignty to override it in any way. Unfortunately, my AK47 never read this treaty....
111
posted on
07/25/2012 6:25:50 PM PDT
by
Repeat Offender
(While the wicked stand confounded, call me with Thy Saints surrounded.)
To: Travis McGee
112
posted on
07/25/2012 6:30:21 PM PDT
by
CodeToad
(History says our end is near.)
To: Squantos
I am sure that the UN Gun Control Commission (consisting of commissioners from China, Syria, Turkey, Tajikistan, Congo and Indonesia) will share an American view of gun rights.
What could possibly go wrong with that? Trust Barack and Hillary. They know what's best for us.
They want to keep us safe from the horror of gun violence.
113
posted on
07/25/2012 6:30:35 PM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: Repeat Offender; rurgan
In case of high treason, there would be
Rule 308 (+)
114
posted on
07/25/2012 6:33:16 PM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: dartuser
The treaty requires gun registrations.
115
posted on
07/25/2012 6:36:04 PM PDT
by
CodeToad
(History says our end is near.)
To: CodeToad
116
posted on
07/25/2012 6:52:31 PM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: xenob
Sounds fascist to me. Get the UN out of the US and stop funding it.
117
posted on
07/25/2012 7:11:03 PM PDT
by
Rapscallion
(Beware. Romney is also a liberal.)
To: napscoordinator; humblegunner; Eaker; Squantos; Jim Robinson
It is impossible to implement so those upset...dont be cuz it could never happen. Thankfully we have a very incompetent government.I really don't mean to offend, but in all sincerity, I say: bullshit.
Bullshit.
118
posted on
07/25/2012 7:29:33 PM PDT
by
glock rocks
(optimist / pessimist? I'm an awesomist - There's a dragon in that glass!)
To: xzins
Thanks for the heads up, xzins.
119
posted on
07/25/2012 7:45:41 PM PDT
by
Girlene
To: Girlene
120
posted on
07/25/2012 7:47:22 PM PDT
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 181-183 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson