A man who can justify mass murder of innocent human life should be president?

July 17, 2012 | Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

I'm sorry folks, but a man who can justify and rationalize in his own mind the wholesale slaughter of innocent human life can justify any kind of evil whatsoever. And he has.

He's justified homosexual marriage, homosexuals in the Boy Scouts, homosexuals in the military. That homosexual couples should be able to adopt children. He's justified that guns are dangerous and should be banned. That free citizens should be forced by the government to purchase insurance contracts against their will or face stiff penalties or taxes. That mandated forced socialized healthcare is a good thing.

That abortion should be safe and legal in America. That since Roe v Wade has been in effect for over twenty years that it is settled law and should be defended as same. That when the government puts Planned Parenthood on the board of his own brainchild signature accomplishment and makes taxpayer funded abortion available on demand, "it's not his fault." That when he appoints liberal judges and appointees, it's not his fault. When a judge rules that homosexual couples should be allowed to marry, so HE orders it done, it's not his fault.

He's justified that the earth is warming and it's caused by man and we are going to have to do something about it. He's justified that since the economy is down and some companies are failing, that it's a good thing that the government stepped in and bailed them out. That government should spend MORE of what it doesn't have to stimulate the economy. That the debt limit should be increased so the government can continue spending even more of what it doesn't have. He's justified in his own mind that fee hikes are not tax increases.

My friends he has justified and personally enacted just about the entire liberal/progressive, abortionist/homosexualist, statist/socialist, big government anti-liberty agenda.

And they have the gonads to ask me for MY vote?

[presently no screen name]

It all boils down to my faith and politics cannot be separated.

Right!

And neither can Romney's and Obama's be separated - something their supporters refuse to recognize. They see them just as political men.

"For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms".

They are godless/pawns of satan.

[skeeter]

Gimme an alternative to p*ssing into the wind and I will be there.

[EternalVigilance]

Jimmy Carter: I'd be 'comfortable' with Mitt Romney

[ArrogantBustard]

Won’t Get Fooled Again
-Pete Townshend

We’ll be fighting in the streets
With our children at our feet
And the morals that they worship will be gone
And the men who spurred us on
Sit in judgement of our wrongs
They decide and the shotgun sings the song

I’ll tip my hat to the new constitution
Take a bow for the new revolution
Smile and grin at the change all around
Pick up my guitar and play
Just like yesterday
Then I’ll get on my knees and pray
We don’t get fooled again

The change, it had to come
We knew it all along
We were liberated from the four-minute song
And the world looks just the same
And history ain’t changed
‘Cause the banners, they all flown in the last war
I’ll tip my hat to the new constitution
Take a bow for the new revolution
Smile and grin at the change all around
Pick up my guitar and play
Just like yesterday
Then I’ll get on my knees and pray
We don’t get fooled again
No, no!

I’ll move myself and my family aside
If we happen to be left half alive
I’ll get all my papers and smile at the sky
For I know that the hypnotized never lie

Do ya?

Yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!

There’s nothing in the street
Looks any different to me
And the slogans are replaced, by-the-bye
And the parting on the left
Is now the parting on the right
And the beards have all grown longer overnight

I’ll tip my hat to the new constitution
Take a bow for the new revolution
Smile and grin at the change all around
Pick up my guitar and play
Just like yesterday
Then I’ll get on my knees and pray
We don’t get fooled again
Don’t get fooled again
No, no!

Yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!

Meet the new boss
Same as the old boss

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

Jimmy Carter: I'd be 'comfortable' with Mitt Romney

Doubtless. ;)

[dirtboy]

Funny, I still don't see those two third-party votes in Obama's column.

It's simple math - a vote for a third-party candidate does not go to Obama. It does not help Romney, but it basically goes off to the side and is not in play.

Try making the case for Romney without inane, worn-out GOP-E talking points. We hear them every four years. I guess it beats the GOP-E actually trying to do something to satisfy the base's core concerns.

[EternalVigilance]

Perfect.

[Above My Pay Grade]

>>>Does it mean you are voting for Obama, then? Let’s face it, staying home in November IS a vote for Obama.<<<

A vote for Romney is, for all intents and purposes, a vote for Obama as well. They are both pro-abortion, anti-gun Socialists.

I’d just a soon see the Democrat party get all the “credit” for destroying America, as have a faux-Conservative like Romney do the same things in the name of “Conservatism”.

We also need to send a message to the RINOs and moderates, that if they try to force any more RINOs like Mitt on us, we will NOT go along.

If Obama is re-elected it will be because the RINOs decided they would rather have Obama than a real conservative, and they demonstrated this by supporting a left-winger like Romney in the primaries.

[what's up]

Romney in the White House along with a GOP House and Senate... we will see some kind of repeal of Obamacare plus reform like buying health insurance across state lines and tort reform.

We are not going to see gay marriage enacted at a Federal level.

We are going to see corporate tax cuts and other tax reforms/simplifications like closing of loopholes.

We are not going to see further EPA activism because the House won't allow it.

Foreign policy will be on much safer ground.

Now, if we get Obama all these things go in the other direction.

You can pretend both candidates are the same but I see a big difference and at such a turning point where Obama would definitely take us down a road of heavy socialism, perversion and fear on the national defence front the choice is not so difficult to make.

[Jimmy Valentine]

Actually rather than a Hobson's choice, it is more a Procrustean Bed.

Either choice is fatal.

[DJ MacWoW]

Amen!

[butterdezillion]

In Jesus’ Name. Amen.

[donna]

It wasn’t conservatives targeting conservatives. The GOP-E just followed their own plan.

[AppyPappy]

Obama or Romney?

[EternalVigilance]

"Still, if you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed, if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not so costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no chance of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves."

"Truth is incontrovertible. Ignorance can deride it; panic may resent it; malice may destroy it; but there it is."

-- Winston Churchill

[DJ MacWoW]

If you stand for nothing, you'll fall for anything.

One doesn't really have any principles if they don't stand on them.

[Raycpa]

I think we have two groups of conservatives to consider. Jim and I belong to states where Obama is going to win no matter how we vote. Our vote going to third party is not going to change outcome but it can show how much support a true conservative could be passing up.

Conservatives in a swing state has a deeper responsibility. On the one hand they can signal that we should not be forced into voting for a liberals by the party. On the other hand we might have a slightly better chance of making it through the next 4 years with a liberal who has some need to attract conservative support rather than a liberal who does not need us and hates us.

I will not second guess that second group’s final decision but am thankful I don’t need to make it.

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

Oddly enough, all the DUmmies and Kos Kiddies are busily lecturing their own, online, that "a vote for any third party candidate is automatically a vote for Mitt Romney... AND THAT'S JUST THE WAY IT IS!!!"

Logically, then: this means that anyone voting third party, in any given presidential election, is actually casting two votes, simultaneously!

CINO/Leftist logic... just takes your breath away, don't it? ;)

[WatchOutForSnakes]

Okay, under the facts we are facing, who in your scenario is “ice cream” that has a chance of winning? And don’t tell me that Romney would be just as bad for the country as another 4 years of Obama because IMHO that is just irrational.

[Ingtar]

I sometimes really wish for a “like” button on FR. Your post is one reason why.