The picture will be posted. Not Guilty.
1 posted on
07/17/2012 4:20:07 AM PDT by
marktwain
To: marktwain
2 posted on
07/17/2012 4:21:12 AM PDT by
marktwain
To: marktwain
4 posted on
07/17/2012 4:32:55 AM PDT by
Timber Rattler
(Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
To: marktwain
6 posted on
07/17/2012 4:33:55 AM PDT by
EEGator
To: marktwain
I’d be pissed if I couldn’t sleep with her every night too!
7 posted on
07/17/2012 4:34:14 AM PDT by
Abathar
(Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
To: marktwain
“Accommodation and bedding are done in a particular way to ensure all the athletes are accommodated in the village.”
...........................................................
I am not too bright, someone tell me how putting a married couple in the same room instead of two seperate rooms doesn’t free up one room.
Of course they wouldn’t dare seperate a homosexual couple.
I wouuld chew through the door to get at that if it were mine.
10 posted on
07/17/2012 4:38:37 AM PDT by
Venturer
To: marktwain
The article is poorly-written, disjointed and vague about what has been officially given as the reason for the apparently punitive discrimination towards the Marks. There's no listing of the specific rules being broken or enforced, whether other married couples are being treated similarly, etc. For example, the official said:
"Accommodation and bedding are done in a particular way to ensure all the athletes are accommodated in the village."The logical question to address would be "what does 'particular way' mean, and where is it spelled out in the rule book?"
In addition, the author, Mr. Mark and the quoted official all seem to be bending over backwards to avoid mentioning the role of the gun in the picture in the controversy. That's probably what really set off the politically correct brouhaha.
To: marktwain
Man, he is in real trouble now....pointing out that gays are held to a different standard in their sleeping arrangements...
Cue the gay Nazi’s troopers...to get his mind right...
13 posted on
07/17/2012 4:44:39 AM PDT by
Popman
(When you elect a clown: expect a circus...)
To: marktwain
What the article illustrates is failure. The Brits running the show failed to anticipate the fact there might be two athletes that were married and to provide accommodations.
The problem is purely Brit failure
14 posted on
07/17/2012 4:48:12 AM PDT by
bert
((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Present failure and impending death yield irrational action))
To: marktwain
15 posted on
07/17/2012 4:48:25 AM PDT by
ZX12R
(FUBO GTFO 2012 !)
To: marktwain
He’s really being punished for threatening to wear the mankini.
17 posted on
07/17/2012 5:35:01 AM PDT by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: marktwain
This is no sport. What man lets his wife pose like this without serious marital problems. They probably don’t sleep together, they’re just attention hogs. Worshiping the self.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson