Skip to comments.
"Now we know"
The Daily Beast ^
| 7-16-2012
| Peter Boyer
Posted on 07/15/2012 3:56:29 PM PDT by palin45potus
Romneys Palin Problem: Wheres Her Convention Invite? Jul 16, 2012 1:00 AM EDT
Mitt still hasnt invited Sarah to the GOPs nomination assembly in Tampa, and the Tea Party is livid. Peter J. Boyer on how the snub could sabotage Romneys tenuous ties to the grassrootsand why Palin is keeping the week open, just in case.
(Excerpt) Read more at thedailybeast.com ...
TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: backstabberromney; palin; pds; romney; romney4obama; romney4soros; stinkerromney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
To: palin45potus
All I can say is, now we know what Mitt really thinks of conservatives.
To: palin45potus
All I can say is, now we know what Mitt really thinks of conservatives.
Was there ever any doubt?
3
posted on
07/15/2012 4:00:06 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: palin45potus
All I can say is, now we know what Mitt really thinks of conservatives.NOW???
4
posted on
07/15/2012 4:00:45 PM PDT
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: palin45potus
If Mitt excludes Palin, I will be home on election day.
I thought he was “bigger” than this.
MEMO TO MITT: Be small and fail.
5
posted on
07/15/2012 4:02:39 PM PDT
by
Rapscallion
(Obama is a Marxist Muslim fraud.)
To: palin45potus
I find it interesting. The vast majority of the ‘right wing’ was in lockstep agreement with Palin’s policies and vision for the future. Most of the time such a person gets elected.
But in this case, they were strangely opposed to the wrapper those ideas came in. Not for any logical reason *see above), but because it was “Palin”.
Had it been any other person in the GOP, they’d have kicked the doors down to back that person. But it was “Palin” so they did not. Right here on FR many of the people who are in near lockstep with Palin’s ideas and vision RE energy, social issues, taxation et all, saddled up and rode for the brand...that brand being PDS. Because it was “Palin”.
Now, when Romney needs conservatives more than ever in order to seal his deal, what does the GOP do?
Comes down with a relapse of PDS. Oh, they are publicly 100% behind her ideas as always...they just don’t like the wrapper they come in. Because it’s “Palin”. May they get what they so righteously earned.
To: palin45potus
She should just show up, arm-in-arm with West. It would be interesting to see how many people gravitate toward them and how many toward the RINOs.
Go for it Sarah and Alan, PLEASE!
7
posted on
07/15/2012 4:04:39 PM PDT
by
mark3681
To: palin45potus
Mr. RomneyCARE will invite the GHOST of American Medicine
to celebrate his GOPe DEATH PANELS.
8
posted on
07/15/2012 4:04:39 PM PDT
by
Diogenesis
("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
To: palin45potus
Mitt still hasnt invited Sarah to the GOPs nomination assembly in Tampa, and the Tea Party is livid. It's not Romney's convention. This author is just flinging feces against the wall to see what sticks.
To: palin45potus
10
posted on
07/15/2012 4:06:54 PM PDT
by
Diogenesis
("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
To: palin45potus
And, of course the bed wetters will respond.
To: Norm Lenhart
You had to turn yourself inside out and backwards to come up with that crap!
12
posted on
07/15/2012 4:09:02 PM PDT
by
Randy Larsen
(No more RINOS!)
To: mark3681
Worth repeating:
She should just show up, arm-in-arm with West. It would be interesting to see how many people gravitate toward them and how many toward the RINOs. Go for it Sarah and Alan, PLEASE!
13
posted on
07/15/2012 4:10:51 PM PDT
by
null and void
(Day 1271 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Heroes aren't made Frank, they're cornered...)
To: Norm Lenhart
My apologies for my above post!
You sir are 100% correct and I am wrong!
14
posted on
07/15/2012 4:12:05 PM PDT
by
Randy Larsen
(No more RINOS!)
To: Randy Larsen; Norm Lenhart
Which part is inaccurate?
15
posted on
07/15/2012 4:12:05 PM PDT
by
null and void
(Day 1271 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Heroes aren't made Frank, they're cornered...)
To: Norm Lenhart
But in this case, they were strangely opposed to the wrapper those ideas came in. Not for any logical reason *see above), but because it was Palin. I heard too many conservatives I otherwise respected refer to her as "that idiot woman".
16
posted on
07/15/2012 4:12:33 PM PDT
by
lightman
(Adjutorium nostrum (+) in nomine Domini--nevertheless, Vote Santorum!)
To: null and void
17
posted on
07/15/2012 4:13:28 PM PDT
by
Randy Larsen
(No more RINOS!)
To: Randy Larsen
*nevermind*
18
posted on
07/15/2012 4:13:40 PM PDT
by
null and void
(Day 1271 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Heroes aren't made Frank, they're cornered...)
To: palin45potus
It’s a race to see which candidate can tick off more of his base.
19
posted on
07/15/2012 4:13:54 PM PDT
by
gitmo
( If your theology doesn't become your biography it's useless.)
To: Norm Lenhart
May they get what they so righteously earned.From your lips, to His ears.
20
posted on
07/15/2012 4:13:54 PM PDT
by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson