1 posted on
07/13/2012 9:31:26 AM PDT by
xzins
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
To: xzins
2 posted on
07/13/2012 9:34:14 AM PDT by
bigbob
To: xzins
The fawning media coverage that Obama gets is worth at least 10 points.
3 posted on
07/13/2012 9:35:47 AM PDT by
Westbrook
(Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
To: xzins
Throw this poll away. 20% of those polled aren't even registered to vote. They have so little interest they can't even be bothered to register. Their opinions don't count and, I'm sure, are weighed heavily towards the regime.
Of the remaining 80%, how many are likely to vote?
4 posted on
07/13/2012 9:35:47 AM PDT by
Former Proud Canadian
(Obamanomics-We don't need your stinking tar sands oil, we'll just grow algae.)
To: xzins
What’s an “independent”?
What does it stand for?
How does one get its vote?
7 posted on
07/13/2012 9:37:38 AM PDT by
EyeGuy
(Armed, judgmental, fiscally responsible heterosexual.)
To: xzins
The samples were weighted to account for demographic composition, Romney wins slightly among independents with each candidate has about 90% support among their own party. To get to the 50-43 Obama lead that means Pew must have assumed a huge (and unwarranted after the 2010 election) lead in the number of Democrats. Garbage in, garbage out.
8 posted on
07/13/2012 9:38:07 AM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(You only have three billion heartbeats in a lifetime.How many does the government claim as its own?)
To: xzins
It’s not called the “Pew” poll for nothing. It’s worthless. However, it does provide jobs for a lot of people.
10 posted on
07/13/2012 9:38:23 AM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(Help reduce voter fraud in America! If you see something, say something!)
To: xzins
11 posted on
07/13/2012 9:38:33 AM PDT by
nhwingut
(Sarah Palin 12... No One Else)
To: xzins
I think if this were a poll for Obama vs “un-named candidate” Obama would be losing.
12 posted on
07/13/2012 9:38:40 AM PDT by
tsowellfan
(http://www.cafenetamerica.com/)
To: xzins
Registered voters.Now lets find out just who they polled.Was it 51% Rat,22% Republican?
14 posted on
07/13/2012 9:40:50 AM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(Jimmy Carter Is No Longer The Worst President Of My Lifetime)
To: xzins
THIS HEADLINE MADE ME LAUGH SO HARD, *LITERALLY LAUGH* THAT MY COWORKERS CAME AROUND TO SEE WHAT WAS SO FUNNY!!!! OMG WTF LOL.....
15 posted on
07/13/2012 9:41:10 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
(Borg Zombies walk around groaning "Commmppuutteerrrrssss......Commmppuutteerrrrssss......")
To: xzins
This was talked about and analyzed yesterday at great lengths. The sample size, included about 7 percent more democrats than republicans and included a large number of “adults”. Sorry, just more propaganda.
17 posted on
07/13/2012 9:42:38 AM PDT by
Perdogg
To: xzins
Comment over at NRO with title: Why Are So Many Pollsters Oversampling Democrats?
http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign-spot/309347/why-are-so-many-pollsters-oversampling-democrats#comment-bar
I have a MS in Computer Science, majoring in Quantitative Mathematics/Statistics. So my side hobby is sort of re-engineering these oversampled polls to the proper party id.
The party id split in 2008 was D+7. While the diff in 2010 was essentially tie.
My program I use just about splits the difference (D+3) to be conservative (even though I think that the R turnout will be higher).
Based on my analysis using a sample of D 36 R 33 I 31 across all national polls over the past 3 months (using RCP list which provides internals/crosstabs), Romney is leading 48.6 - 44.2 (Romney +4.2)
If you use a 34|34|32 sample, you would get Romney leading 49.8 - 43.4 (Romney +5.4)
18 posted on
07/13/2012 9:43:45 AM PDT by
nhwingut
(Sarah Palin 12... No One Else)
To: xzins
The “No Romney, No Way” crowd at FR should be rejoicing in this news.
23 posted on
07/13/2012 9:48:42 AM PDT by
Notary Sojac
(Ut veniant omnes)
To: xzins
You really have to dig to get to the internals these days.
But with persistence, I got:
So, we have the weighting being: Rep: 28%, Dem: 35%, Ind: 32%
7 point lead for Dems right out of the box.
They are trying to hide it, of course, by burying the internals. I expect at some point they will simply do away with showing the internals, outright.
24 posted on
07/13/2012 9:49:11 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
(Borg Zombies walk around groaning "Commmppuutteerrrrssss......Commmppuutteerrrrssss......")
To: xzins
1. “Registered Voters.”
That alone invalidates the poll. I think around half of “Registered Voters” actually vote.
2. The only states that matter are the “battle ground” states, like Ohio, Florida, North Carolina, Virginia, etc. The rest of the states are pretty much decided. A 100% for Obama in California, Massachusetts, or New York, does not matter - there was no chance those states were going for the ‘Pubbie any way.
25 posted on
07/13/2012 9:52:45 AM PDT by
Little Ray
(FOR the best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
To: xzins
27 posted on
07/13/2012 9:53:40 AM PDT by
jimfree
(In Nov 2012 my 12 y/o granddaughter will have more relevant executive experience than Barack Obama)
To: xzins
Obama is favored by 88 percent of Democrats while 89 percent of Republicans favor Romney, who leads among independent voters 46 percent to 45 percent for Obama.This means that the Republicans plus the independents are fewer in number than the Democrats.
29 posted on
07/13/2012 9:55:19 AM PDT by
Raycpa
To: xzins
The P-—you poll....also skewed left in respondents and questions
30 posted on
07/13/2012 9:56:49 AM PDT by
Nifster
To: xzins
Polls are all over the place right now which suggests to me that they are pretty worthless. Once they start to converge we’ll have to pay attention. Except for one outlier the polls were dead on with the final results in Wisconsin.
37 posted on
07/13/2012 10:02:28 AM PDT by
bkepley
To: xzins
... internals show that Obama wins 50-43 among Dem welfare bums reached on their couches during the day..." LOL!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson