Posted on 07/11/2012 8:44:48 AM PDT by Coleus
When it comes to faith in sports, Tim Tebow is probably the first guy who comes to mind.
Tebow has most people thinking that being a Christian likely involves some form of constant prayer, shout-outs to Jesus and rules that get rid of a lot of fun.
But Tebow's outspokenness isn't the only way athletes sincerely approach faith. Bryce Harper, who ascribes to Mormonism, has become an example of another young, talented player who is bringing his beliefs into the public eye, albeit it in a much different way.
Both Tebow and Harper are showing the sports world that there are plenty of ways to talk about faith. And maybe, by doing that, they can help athletes and fans find a deeper understanding and growth when it comes to beliefs.
Harper is known mostly for his brash public persona, from his gamesmanship on the baseball diamond to his "clown question" cult hero status. He first broke into public consciousness when was labeled on a Sports Illustrated cover as the next great baseball player, a phenom who could hit bombs and had the tools for an incredible all-around game.
Harper's ascent to the major leagues, where he now plays for the Washington Nationals, was full of awe, but it also had some hiccups. Harper has never been shy about showing his talent, and as he conquered each stage of the game, he started showing people up, too. He's blown kisses at a pitcher, drawn lines in the dirt to show umpires where he thought strikes were balls and, overall, been pretty cocky.
That's why a lot of people do a double-take when they find out Harper is Mormon -- and not just check-a-box Mormon, but follow-the-book Mormon. Harper famously doesn't drink (the source of "that's a clown question, bro"), but he also doesn't party or get into much mischief off the field.
It's difficult to imagine the impetuous Harper as a devout anything, but by all reports, he's serious about his faith. And as he becomes a larger figure in American consciousness, he hasn't been shy about acknowledging what he believes and explaining how it fits in with his everyday life.
His approach is in great contrast to Tebow. Not only do the two athletes believe different things -- please, understand that evangelical Christianity and Mormonism are extremely different, and very much needing the dividing lines that people draw -- but they also live their beliefs in opposite ways.
Tebow leads with his faith, making it the forefront of everything he does. His eyeblack had Bible verses, and his virginity and other life choices are prime fodder in any interview. He even preaches at church services and prays publicly with people. Harper, on the other hand, has let his play and personality carry him so far, with his faith a comfortable but not controlling part of the conversation.
Both athletes are equally polarizing. While Tebow's beliefs put most people off, Harper's attitude is what riles people against him. If anything, Tebow is the perfect example of a person living out his faith no matter the costs, while Harper is the test case for whether people will accept players' beliefs if the athletes put their game first and present their views as a secondary concern, in the realm of "I didn't know that about him," and "that's interesting."
So, which is better? Do you want someone who is upfront about his faith, who never shies away from the beliefs that have shaped his life, even to the point of being obnoxious? Or do you want a player who is in your face about how good he is but keeps his creed to himself?
Maybe the question here is not one of preference. Maybe the takeaway from seeing two guys who are so drastically different taking their faith into professional sports is that it matters less how someone presents his beliefs than that he is showing them in the first place. If faith is as important as those who follow it say it is -- if it is truly life-changing and the rhythm by which people live -- isn't it great that these two athletes have found ways to carry it into a professional world full of ego, poor behavior, drug use or just flat-out immaturity?
Millions of Americans follow specific beliefs and creeds, but when it comes to public life, any matter of faith has been rolled into the "religion" category, where it's become as dangerous as politics. It's a touchy point, rarely discussed because of the disagreements it can cause. Seeing athletes show how their beliefs fit into everyday life, even at such a high level, should be an encouragement in a nation that struggles when discussing the topic. Faith shouldn't be a dividing line -- it should be a source of hope that brings people together. And seeing top-tier professional athletes who not only share their faith but also live it shows those watching that there's more than dogma when it comes to centering one's life around beliefs.
Whether people agree with Tebow or Harper or not, the beliefs by which they live are a major part of everyday people's lives. Learning more about faith isn't just a way to see how Tebow and Harper tick -- it's a way to strengthen communities and find the life-changing truth behind the smokescreen of religion.
Tebow and Harper aren't fully representative of their respective faith communities. Mormons have to be a bit shy about some of Harper's choices, especially concerning his attitude. Some of his actions don't necessarily jive with Mormon teachings on good behavior. (Harper also breaks the mold on the clean-cut young Mormon missionary, although it should be noted that most religious sects aren't so tight on their requirements for knee-length skirts and shirts and ties these days.)
Some evangelicals are just as unsure about jumping full-force behind Tebow. While he is open about his faith and lives according to his beliefs, he has also created a narrowness about what it means to be a Christian, especially among the younger generation.
But the bottom line is that both players are leaning on their faith to change their lives, and leaning on their place in the limelight to spread their faith further. Whether their eyeblack is covered in tidy Bible verses or streaming down their faces in brash confidence, they've brought the deeper life to the shine and charade of professional sports.
Critics may pick apart how Tebow chooses to live, and whether Harper's moxie matches Mormon beliefs. But if they're talking about that, they're talking about faith. And that's a boon to anyone who believes that that's what really matters in all of this.
Yet in their public behavior, modern Mormons seems to be like people out of the ‘50s. Like Ezra Taft Benson, for instance. Will he pull lots of people from the Church into his administration, as Obama has done his true believers?
- - - - - -
Public behavior and private lives are very different in Mormonism. Utah has the highest rate of Prozac use, and has very high rates of suicide and prescription drug abuse. A lot of that has to do with the pressure in the Mormon church to APPEAR ‘perfect’ - the perfect husband, the perfect wife and mother, perfect children, wealth is seen as proof of ‘living the gospel’, it is a lot of pressure.
Will Romney pull Mormons in at a higher rate - definitely. A lot of small Mormon companies will only hire Mormons (I worked for three of them and lost one job when I left the LDS church) and it is a similar thing. Mitt has already named Mormon (and former Utah Gov) Mike Levitt to head up his transition team.
There is a lot to admire in the Mormon “Errand into the Wilderness. I have read parts of the ‘Great Basin Kingdom,” by Arrington. In some ways it is like the Zionist enterprise. It is also like the Massachusetts Bay Colony in its approach. Except that the Puritans were 1)hard-nosed Trinitarians and 2) hard drinkers.:)
Read the other side of it, it is nowhere NEAR as rosy as Arrington (who wrote faith promoting history only) paints it. There is a dark side that the LDS ignore or flat out lie about.
I can give you some recommendations if you would like.
I know nothing about Tebow because I won’t touch pro-foot ball with a ten foot pole. I just can’t take it, never could and I stopped following college ball years ago.
The only reason I posted becasue the article said the way he acts is in conflict with LDS. I have seen nothing that would detract from that group based on what I have seen of Harper on MASN.
Freegards
There was a dark side to the New England colonies, too: the wars of extermination of the neighboring indians tribes, which was a bit like a replay of “Joshua.” But, yes, I would like some recommendations. Perhaps a critique of Mormon theology.
The best website and resource is Utah Lighthouse Ministry. The founder, Sandra Tanner, is a walking encylopedia of Mormon history and doctrine and will be happy to talk to you via email or over the phone. They also have a bookstore (with several books by LDS writers as well) and some online books.
Here is a link to the online books, The Hoth Diary and Brighams Destroying Angel are both good.
http://utlm.org/navonlinebooks.htm
For print books, I would recommend the following....
Under the Banner of Heaven (polygamy mostly but also early Utah history)
Blood of the Prophets: Brigham Young and the Massacre at Mountain Meadows (also covers the trek west and life in Utah)
Conflict in the Quorum: Orson Pratt, Brigham Young, Joseph Smith by Gary James Bergera
Cultures In Conflict by John E. Hallwas & Roger D. Launiusn (mostly dealing with the LDS in Illinois)
Faith and Betrayal: A Pioneer Woman’s Passage in the American West - Sally Denton
An Insider’s View of Mormon Origins by Grant Palmer (a true believing Mormon this book got him disciplined by the LDS church and ultimately a showdown between him resigning or being excommunicated)
On the Mormon Frontier: The Diary of Hosea Stout, 1844-1889 - Juanita Brooks
Devil’s Gate: Brigham Young and the Great Mormon Handcart Tragedy
Forgotten Kingdom: The Mormon Theocracy in the American West 1847-1896
Hope this helps and Sandra can direct you to even more resources.
For an overview of Mormonism -
Mormonism—Shadow or Reality? By Jerald and Sandra Tanner
And Reasoning from the Scriptures with Mormons - Ron Rhodes
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.