Posted on 07/11/2012 8:44:48 AM PDT by Coleus
When it comes to faith in sports, Tim Tebow is probably the first guy who comes to mind.
Tebow has most people thinking that being a Christian likely involves some form of constant prayer, shout-outs to Jesus and rules that get rid of a lot of fun.
But Tebow's outspokenness isn't the only way athletes sincerely approach faith. Bryce Harper, who ascribes to Mormonism, has become an example of another young, talented player who is bringing his beliefs into the public eye, albeit it in a much different way.
Both Tebow and Harper are showing the sports world that there are plenty of ways to talk about faith. And maybe, by doing that, they can help athletes and fans find a deeper understanding and growth when it comes to beliefs.
Harper is known mostly for his brash public persona, from his gamesmanship on the baseball diamond to his "clown question" cult hero status. He first broke into public consciousness when was labeled on a Sports Illustrated cover as the next great baseball player, a phenom who could hit bombs and had the tools for an incredible all-around game.
Harper's ascent to the major leagues, where he now plays for the Washington Nationals, was full of awe, but it also had some hiccups. Harper has never been shy about showing his talent, and as he conquered each stage of the game, he started showing people up, too. He's blown kisses at a pitcher, drawn lines in the dirt to show umpires where he thought strikes were balls and, overall, been pretty cocky.
That's why a lot of people do a double-take when they find out Harper is Mormon -- and not just check-a-box Mormon, but follow-the-book Mormon. Harper famously doesn't drink (the source of "that's a clown question, bro"), but he also doesn't party or get into much mischief off the field.
It's difficult to imagine the impetuous Harper as a devout anything, but by all reports, he's serious about his faith. And as he becomes a larger figure in American consciousness, he hasn't been shy about acknowledging what he believes and explaining how it fits in with his everyday life.
His approach is in great contrast to Tebow. Not only do the two athletes believe different things -- please, understand that evangelical Christianity and Mormonism are extremely different, and very much needing the dividing lines that people draw -- but they also live their beliefs in opposite ways.
Tebow leads with his faith, making it the forefront of everything he does. His eyeblack had Bible verses, and his virginity and other life choices are prime fodder in any interview. He even preaches at church services and prays publicly with people. Harper, on the other hand, has let his play and personality carry him so far, with his faith a comfortable but not controlling part of the conversation.
Both athletes are equally polarizing. While Tebow's beliefs put most people off, Harper's attitude is what riles people against him. If anything, Tebow is the perfect example of a person living out his faith no matter the costs, while Harper is the test case for whether people will accept players' beliefs if the athletes put their game first and present their views as a secondary concern, in the realm of "I didn't know that about him," and "that's interesting."
So, which is better? Do you want someone who is upfront about his faith, who never shies away from the beliefs that have shaped his life, even to the point of being obnoxious? Or do you want a player who is in your face about how good he is but keeps his creed to himself?
Maybe the question here is not one of preference. Maybe the takeaway from seeing two guys who are so drastically different taking their faith into professional sports is that it matters less how someone presents his beliefs than that he is showing them in the first place. If faith is as important as those who follow it say it is -- if it is truly life-changing and the rhythm by which people live -- isn't it great that these two athletes have found ways to carry it into a professional world full of ego, poor behavior, drug use or just flat-out immaturity?
Millions of Americans follow specific beliefs and creeds, but when it comes to public life, any matter of faith has been rolled into the "religion" category, where it's become as dangerous as politics. It's a touchy point, rarely discussed because of the disagreements it can cause. Seeing athletes show how their beliefs fit into everyday life, even at such a high level, should be an encouragement in a nation that struggles when discussing the topic. Faith shouldn't be a dividing line -- it should be a source of hope that brings people together. And seeing top-tier professional athletes who not only share their faith but also live it shows those watching that there's more than dogma when it comes to centering one's life around beliefs.
Whether people agree with Tebow or Harper or not, the beliefs by which they live are a major part of everyday people's lives. Learning more about faith isn't just a way to see how Tebow and Harper tick -- it's a way to strengthen communities and find the life-changing truth behind the smokescreen of religion.
Tebow and Harper aren't fully representative of their respective faith communities. Mormons have to be a bit shy about some of Harper's choices, especially concerning his attitude. Some of his actions don't necessarily jive with Mormon teachings on good behavior. (Harper also breaks the mold on the clean-cut young Mormon missionary, although it should be noted that most religious sects aren't so tight on their requirements for knee-length skirts and shirts and ties these days.)
Some evangelicals are just as unsure about jumping full-force behind Tebow. While he is open about his faith and lives according to his beliefs, he has also created a narrowness about what it means to be a Christian, especially among the younger generation.
But the bottom line is that both players are leaning on their faith to change their lives, and leaning on their place in the limelight to spread their faith further. Whether their eyeblack is covered in tidy Bible verses or streaming down their faces in brash confidence, they've brought the deeper life to the shine and charade of professional sports.
Critics may pick apart how Tebow chooses to live, and whether Harper's moxie matches Mormon beliefs. But if they're talking about that, they're talking about faith. And that's a boon to anyone who believes that that's what really matters in all of this.
The arrogance is familiar in Harper.
- - - - - - -
That it is, I remember it well.
:)
While he is open about his faith and lives according to his beliefs, he has also created a narrowness about what it means to be a Christian, especially among the younger generation.******
Tebow has created nothing about what it means to be a Christian. Christianity isn’t some sort of self-styled religion designed to glorify self. It’s about dying to self, picking up your cross and following Christ wherever that may lead.
Tebow simply glorifies his Savior through his daily existence and in so doing encourages others in the faith.
Exactly. The LDS (Mormon) approach is to make ‘the Church’ look good and they use the same terms but have different meanings. They will also flat out LIE about their doctrines in order to sound more ‘Christian’ under the guise of ‘milk before meat’.
Last year I wrote an example here on FR of Mormon/Christian dialogue which shows how subtle (and knowing) LDS lying is.
When I was Mormon, I truly believed I was a Christian (and like all other LDS that we were the only TRUE Christians and traditional Christians were apostates). It was only after God freed me from Mormonism did I see I wasn’t really a Christian at all, I could not be one and be Mormon.
I am going to add Harper to my prayer list.
Overall, a pretty good article.
“Some evangelicals ... he has also created a narrowness about what it means to be a Christian, especially among the younger generation.”
Tebow hasn’t created a narrowness - God created the Rules and Tim is just trying to follow them as a true believer. Any Evangelical who doesn’t get that should question where he/she gets her marching orders from.
Consider the source of criticism towards Tebow — all I see are spoiled brats who hate it that Tebow isn’t a hypocrite. Football is a means to an end, and that end is for advancing the Gospel. Go, TIMMY!
I agree. I was a little confused on the initial use of “narrowness”. If I read correctly, I thought it was saying it as a negative and meaning the word “narrowness” as simplicity.
Being a Christian isn’t some fun little game where you wear a WWJD bracelet and everything is good. It’s deeper than that. I was meaning to convey that I feel Tebow does promote that it is something that is deep and not just slogans and show.
I agree with everything you said. God created the rules. It’s us that makes the “narrow” road wider and that is unbiblical and dangerous.
Prayer “works.”
What bothers me about Romney’s faith is that there is so little common ground between his theology and Christian theology. Now, because the Mormon leaders periodically have “revelations,” It might be that they are moving closer to normative Christianity. Or it might not, that they are like Obama and are dissembling, which makes their actions unpredictable.
It might be that they are moving closer to normative Christianity.
- - - - - —
I don’t think so. First of all there hasn’t been a official ‘revelation’ since 1978, second in order to move close to normative Christianity, they would need to renounce the entire foundation of their faith (apostasy and restoration, the Book of Mormon, and Joseph Smith) as well as all of their core theology. It would be a turnaround that would make the changes in the Worldwide Church of God (Armstrong) look like nothing.
I don’t see it happening.
People who don't know anything about what he's brought to the game this year fall back on mistakes he made when he was 15-16 years old...acting like a 15 or 16 year old kid. He shows all of them up!
Prayer does work. Many years after I left Mormonism, I discovered that some friends had known the bookstore owner who challenged me in Provo and were praying for me and all the other LDS he would come in contact with. They didn’t even know me then, yet they were praying that I would be reached and I was.
Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and borad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it. Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. (Matthew 7:13-15)
This pretty much sums up the difference between a Bible-believing Christian and anyone else the world prefers, such as this Mormon.
I wonder what this author thinks of all the MLB Latin players who when they get a hit or as a pitcher strike some one out, will point to the sky and take god.
Thank God......whoops.
“borad” == “broad”
This is where Christians blow it when they get into debates where they appear to be defending “their” views. Kirk Cameron is constantly under attack, and he says the right words that it’s not his rules, but God’s. Non-believers don’t understand the distinction, so they get very angry at him (and Tebow). This author using the word “narrow” illustrates it perfectly. Not sure if he means “simple” or if he is honing in on Tebow’s virtuousness/virginity that so many Libs think is just plain stupid and impossible. How wrong they are. Young people really don’t like being railroaded into corrupt behavior - they need to have more young role models to see the Gospel lived out.
So the major changes were about social policy:polygamy and racism. With the break down in traditional marriage, do you think that might edge back toward Brigham Young’s views? It is my understanding that the other Mormon body never did accept it, out of loyalty to Smith’s wife.
Ain't that the truth.
So the major changes were about social policy:polygamy and racism. With the break down in traditional marriage, do you think that might edge back toward Brigham Young’s views? It is my understanding that the other Mormon body never did accept it, out of loyalty to Smith’s wife.
- - - - - - -
Right, the RLDS (now Community of Christ) never practiced polygamy, that is the group that Emma Smith (Joseph’s legal wife) went with. On the other hand, the FLDS still practice polygamy and follow Brigham Young. In effect they are the true Mormons.
I do expect to see changes back to polygamy. The LDS have kept the revelation on polygamy, still practice it in some ways (men can be married for eternity to more than one woman in this life just not legally married to more than one at a time - women cannot), and teach that polygamy will be reinstated during the Millennium (when Christ rules from Missiouri).
I fully expect to see revelations on homosexuality being acceptable (they are already moving a little in that direction with allowing openly gay people to have mid level church jobs) in the next 10-15 years and if polygamy is legalized then they will have another ‘revelation’ very quickly bringing it back. I know many LDS who are working for that and praying for it as well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.