No possible chemical reaction can provide the level of energy measured. Despite all the hoopla to the contrary, the measurements were NOT either badly done or inaccurate. In this area I am a genuine expert. The supposed "errors" are all bullshit.
"His credibility too."
Which is why the observations of the different attendees are important evidence. It isn't just Rossi.
"Complete fraud is still more likely."
Based on the totality of available data, no.
You are, of course, free to believe whatever you like, as I am, despite the self-appointed posting police.
"Unless he allows independent testing of his "coolant", I'm not convinced it isn't a chemical reaction."Doesn't match what you're saying here:No possible chemical reaction can provide the level of energy measured. Despite all the hoopla to the contrary, the measurements were NOT either badly done or inaccurate. In this area I am a genuine expert. The supposed "errors" are all bullshit.
"His credibility too."
Which is why the observations of the different attendees are important evidence. It isn't just Rossi.
"Complete fraud is still more likely."
Based on the totality of available data, no.
You and those like you are WORSE than Rossi. If Rossi dupes a few investors, that is simply money.You seem to have your doubts.
How can you say that? How many gallons of "coolant" did he push though the system? What if it wasn't coolant?
Which is why the observations of the different attendees are important evidence. It isn't just Rossi.
If they're only looking with their eyes, how good is the evidence?
No possible chemical reaction can provide the level of energy measured.
My simple calculations show that's not the case.