How can you say that? How many gallons of "coolant" did he push though the system? What if it wasn't coolant?
Which is why the observations of the different attendees are important evidence. It isn't just Rossi.
If they're only looking with their eyes, how good is the evidence?
How can you say that? How many gallons of “coolant” did he push though the system? What if it wasn’t coolant?
***Rehashing. Those scenarios were covered more than a year ago.
How to Prove that the Rossi/Focardi eCAT LENR is Real (or fake)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2730401/posts
Sunday, June 05, 2011 7:52:15 PM · by Kevmo · 54 replies
LENR.QUMBO.com ^ | April 6, 2011 | Alan Fletcher
LOL. The flow through the system was measured multiple ways in every experiment. And any sufficiently reactive chemical would be immediately apparent by color, viscosity, or other indicator (peroxide is often assumed...in the presence of the metals of the reactor, H2O2 would come out as foam...immediately visible).
"If they're only looking with their eyes, how good is the evidence?"
You perhaps missed all the instrumentation used??? Some of which the observers sneaked in and of which Rossi was not immediately aware (although they "did" stop when he so requested).
All of which above points show, that like all chronic skeptics, you have NOT examined the evidence, but are speculating.