Posted on 07/02/2012 5:20:32 PM PDT by george76
The Supreme Court justices stance on President Obamas Medicaid expansion provision could be good news for states that want to lower their drinking ages from the federally mandated 21.
...
The Supreme Court ruled that threatening to take away a states Medicaid funding unless the state does what the federal government wants is unconstitutionally coercive and declared it invalid. Because any given part of a Supreme Court decision can set a precedent for future laws and can even invalidate an established law if it is challenged using the Supreme Courts new argument, the Medicaid decision could affect the National Minimum Drinking Age Act.
In 1984 Congress passed the law that made it illegal for anyone in the United States under the age of 21 to purchase or publicly possess alcohol. While drinking laws are and always have been a states issue, the federal government was able to enforce the minimum age by making it a part of the Federal Aid Highway Act
(Excerpt) Read more at thedailybeast.com ...
much less the 26 yr old 'child' clause of deathcare...
...If you can vote and serve our country in the military at 18, you should be able to get an alcoholic drink
You know I agree.
Its just that I don’t agree with teenagers drinking OR serving in the military - a teen not voting or drinking doesn’t bother me at all, but the hypocrisy that you pointed out is certainly valid.
Except in times of war the age for full time Service in the Military should really be 21.
Perhaps some conditional or reserve service and training in support roles could be provided for between 18 - 21.
I remember the governor of Connecticut, a handsome woman named Ella Grasso, who was one of the last (perhaps the last) holdout against the feds forcing the state to increase the drinking age. She said that someone coming home from the military deserved a cold beer. Eventually, the state folded.
Just part of the incremental growth of the federal government. It’s actually one of the incidents that had led me to conservatism and Constitutionalism; I guess taking beer away from a 19-year-old can do that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.