Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Affordable Care Act SCOTUS Decision--Live Thread
SCOTUSblog ^ | June 28, 2012 | SCOTUSblog

Posted on 06/28/2012 4:56:21 AM PDT by John W

Today is the day. SCOTUSblog live at 8:45 AM.

(Excerpt) Read more at scotusblog.wpengine.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; backstabberromney; benedictromney; bho44; bhohealthcare; bhoscotus; deathpanels; doomandgloomers; etchasketch; fumr; mitt4romney; natteringnabobs; natterynaybobs; obama4romney; obamacare; obamaoneanddone; obamawhite; obamneycare; promisethemanything; romney4nytimes; romney4romney; romneyantigop; romneycare; ruling; saynotomitt; verminromney; zerocare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 841-848 next last
To: andrew1957

I would agree with that.


21 posted on 06/28/2012 5:08:13 AM PDT by John W (Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: prisoner6

Ibid!


22 posted on 06/28/2012 5:11:48 AM PDT by Real Cynic No More (OBAMA!!'s name is all caps as sarcasm to indicate a lack of respect, as he does not deserve it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kabar

I dreamed a couple of days ago...that they DID uphold the WHOLE thing...Pray that dream does NOT come true!!


23 posted on 06/28/2012 5:12:13 AM PDT by Rca2000 ( NEVER underestimate the power of "one little election", in WI.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: John W
I am fearful that today will mark the final nail in the coffin of Capitalism. If Obamacare stands, we will have to look for another place to live. This country will just further descend into the hell that is Socialism. America’ was the world's last best hope (Hitchens)........it will not survive as a successful country under Socialism.
24 posted on 06/28/2012 5:13:37 AM PDT by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy
Ever notice that liberal presidents never seem to make the same type of mistake in their nominees?
25 posted on 06/28/2012 5:13:55 AM PDT by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: John W

I will have to line up the live coverage on MSNBC and CNN. That way if it is shot down I can watch and enjoy.
Look and listen for the pale faces and heavily medicated voices.
If it is shot down I predict the left will once again cry racism.
Oh, and they will actually try to tie the recovery of the economy into Obamacare.
They will not be sucessful.
Insanity on parade.
Well, its always been on parade on the left. Its just that more people will suddenly wake up and see it for the first time.


26 posted on 06/28/2012 5:14:27 AM PDT by Leep (Enemy of the StatistI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
Why do they wait so long to announce?

Because prior to the announcement each of them can still change his mind, or at least amend the written opinion? That would be my guess.

27 posted on 06/28/2012 5:14:56 AM PDT by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: John W

Prediction:
No more individual mandate but the SJ will make it very easy for Democrats to barrel ahead with 0-Care. If 0 can screw Arizona he will find away to screw the rest of us


28 posted on 06/28/2012 5:16:13 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W

I’m dying to light up a victory stogie.

I don’t even want to consider defeat.


29 posted on 06/28/2012 5:16:13 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas (Viva Christo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
Why not announce as soon as the two positions — the ruling and the dissent — are written up?,

I read some court opinions that have to do with taxes. These opinions are tricky things. A no answer based on one set of reasoning could set up unwanted consequences for other laws or leave the door open for how to craft an acceptable law that accomplishes the same thing. In addition, a well reasoned yes answer could lay the ground work to keep similar laws from ever getting started.

30 posted on 06/28/2012 5:16:28 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: alice_in_bubbaland

Roberts is a constitutionalist, not a conservative..

The arizona ruling was 100% correct...

The ruling on corporate campaign contributions was 100% correct...

Roberts is a far cry from dissappointing, he will side with the constitution, regardless of what is “popular” or “trendy”...


31 posted on 06/28/2012 5:17:47 AM PDT by joe fonebone (I am the 15%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: John W

I’ll be going into a meeting right at 10 ET


32 posted on 06/28/2012 5:17:58 AM PDT by Mercat (Necessity is the argument of tyrants. John Milton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alice_in_bubbaland

I agree, after the last two decisions, I don’t hold much hope for a complete removal of this mistake by design legislation. The result is the US loses with anything less than complete removal of it.

By writing the “law” as they did, they leave future administrations powerless to do much given the gridlock in the country...that is why there are so many pages in it.

At best I think the mandate could go but even so, his excellency will executive order anything he wishes unless there is some strong language in a dissent against doing so. They would be wise to include such language in the majority, kind of a preinjunction, if the mandate goes given how His Excellency handled the Az decision and his pension to rule by fiat. That will not happen though.

At the oral hearing stage, I felt the mandate goes something like 6 to 3 with Ginsburg surprisingly voting for it to go along with the usual 5. Given she is writing the dissent, not so sure about that now either. So, at best the mandate goes 5-4 and the rest stays but I am not holding my breath on that.

If the law stands, that will mean greater resolve for a hair on fire movement to get rid of all the dems in Nov. Also, it means those dems leaning to vote to contempt Holder will probably back off as they will see His Excellency as having aleg up in the coming election and they know how vindictive the egomaniac is.


33 posted on 06/28/2012 5:18:40 AM PDT by Mouton (Voting is an opiate of the electorate. Nothing changes no matter who wins..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

bkmk


34 posted on 06/28/2012 5:18:50 AM PDT by Raebie (WS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: John W; mickie; flaglady47
I guess I'm the only one who feels that this prolonged high drama by the Supremes has been unnecessary, unbecoming and an embarrassment to the Court as an institution and to our country as a whole.

To me the prolonged wait has just smacked from the beginning to be another Kardashian reality show, with the actors in robes, and the whole suspense drama titillating the media along with the Oprah-ized lumpen masses.

What's next, public betting parlors and oddsmakers for Supreme Court decisions? Oscar awards for the Justice who drops the most clues without revealing the secret in the envelope, please?

I'll bet many of the great Supreme Court jurists of the past are cringing in their graves over this theater of the absurd.

Leni

35 posted on 06/28/2012 5:19:10 AM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daler

Keep an eye on both kagan and the “wise latina”... I have a feeling they are not quite the activists that fubo hoped for....


36 posted on 06/28/2012 5:19:38 AM PDT by joe fonebone (I am the 15%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye
Don't start that "we will have to look for another place to live" stuff.
Romney already told us he will replace it with his plan. :/
See, everything will be fine for us peons to stupid to make choices
as long as we're smart enough to vote them into office.
37 posted on 06/28/2012 5:21:59 AM PDT by MaxMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Rca2000
"I dreamed a couple of days ago...that they DID uphold the WHOLE thing...Pray that dream does NOT come true!!"

Hopefully that just means that our dreams tend to reflect our fears rather than our hopes.

38 posted on 06/28/2012 5:22:12 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: John W

This I am sure will turn out to be one of the greatest days in the this Republic’s history.

The ramifications, if it is not squashed are to enormous to even fully consider. The Government will have the power and the LAW to tell us what to do, without question. That’s based on the stupid “previous ruling” agreement.


39 posted on 06/28/2012 5:23:38 AM PDT by BornToBeAmerican (Things aren't as good as they should be and its Obama's fault, the resident said)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W

Will the decision come down at 8:45 or 9:00?


40 posted on 06/28/2012 5:24:02 AM PDT by ducttape45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 841-848 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson