Posted on 06/19/2012 8:02:28 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
With its new Surface Tablet, Microsoft didn’t just break the mold. It smashed it into a million little pieces, chucked them all into the furnace and set the temperature to obliterate. There really is no precedent for what Microsoft did this week. What was once recognizable is gone. The expected is no more. There are no rules, only supply and the possibility of demand.
Microsoft finally built the tablet it wants to use for its platform: an ultra-thin, superlight, kick-stand-sporting, brainiac-cover wearing, touch screen wonder that elicited dozens of “I wants” in Mashable’s live blog chatter.
Surface is still wrapped in so much mystery (no pricing, no availability, no processor speed) that it remains something of an enigma. On the other hand, the tablet (which, depending on how you look at it, may be a full-blown tablet or a hybrid tablet PC) is no reference design. This is not the pad Microsoft wants its partners to build.
The partners are, at least in this instance, out of the picture.
This Is the Windows 8 Tablet
Lenovo, Acer, Asus, Dell, HP, Toshiba and others will surely deliver dozens of Windows 8-based devices this year. Many will sport Intel CPUs. Some, like Asus and Lenovo, are planning tablets and convertibles. These may or may not be well-received. This is no longer Microsoft’s problem.
Or is it?
What, for example, does Microsoft say about Windows tablet design now? Can it point to anything but its own Surface tablet as the epitome of Windows 8 design? Not likely. And what about that very smart cover with the built-in touch or tactile keyboard (take your pick)? Microsoft won’t license that design to its partners. So it’s inevitable that Windows RT partners will always have second best covers.
(Excerpt) Read more at mashable.com ...
Gee, you win. I will so inform my XP systems.
Haha! Love it! I put a marker on “Windows XP, Vista, ME, 7, never crashed on me” Seriously tho, Only computer afficianado would really care about the differences between the brands, most people use the pc or mac for ordinary everyday tasks and don’t use even 5 a tenth of one percent of a computers endless possible functions.
Heh heh, good one! I like your OS Wars Bingo. I’ve had to work and code on many platforms at the system level. Unix, Windows, NT, Novell, IBM (all the way back to OS/370), Macs, 6502, 8080, and a lot most people never heard of like IVPhase. Always amazes me when people insult others based on only using one. Sort of like only using one car and hauling a refridgerator on the roof (I have 5 vehicles for different purposes). People need to get out and try multiple platforms and stick to facts.
Their timing bites.
A couple of days after Steve Jobs died, I bought an iPad in his memory—also because I decided that a pad would do everything I needed in a laptop. I prefer the user-friendly Windows environment... but I’m not going to go out and spend a few hundred dollars when I still have a perfectly good (albeit user-unfriendly) iPad.
... So can I install Linux on it?
I prefer 'hyperbolus'.
So when will it be running Ubuntu?
That keyboard looks like using it would feel like drumming the fingers on a sheet of construction paper. Even the chintziest laptop/notebook is more ergonomic than that.
Depends on how you use them. If you navigate with IE (will the latest patches) to unknown websites you will eventually get zero-dayed, no doubt about it. With Safari, that is not as likely, but still possible.
I am a dedicated PC user for decades. Apple will never see my money for a desktop or a laptop. I do, however, own an iPhone and an iPad2, and my experience is that both of of them do what they’re designed to do quite well.
Could you explain to me how an iPad is “user-unfriendly”?
Depends what city you are in.
Wow!! Not even available yet.
Umm How long has the ipad been out??
A convertible tablet/notebook with full desktop functionality was a giant niche waiting to be filled. It looks like Microsoft may have done it.
Regarding their hardware partners, I imagine that Microsoft will support them by keeping the price fairly high, at least initially, allowing them to develop their own comparable devices profitably. Businesses should be able to justify the cost, if it’s comparable to a high end notebook.
Why the premature publicity? Maybe Apple has something similar in the works. But Microsoft’s advantage is the business market.
-—People need to get out and try multiple platforms and stick to facts.——
That’s crazy talk!
;-)
-—People need to get out and try multiple platforms and stick to facts.——
That’s crazy talk!
;-)
Congratulations! You barely got the initial traditional insult in the top 10 posts.
MSDOS isn't done
until Lotus won't run...
Since it was announced.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.