I can't poke holes in Rothenberg's analysis at this stage of the game.
1 posted on
06/19/2012 5:33:10 PM PDT by
randita
To: Clintonfatigued; Impy; AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj; no dems; Kaslin; perfect_rovian_storm; ...
2 posted on
06/19/2012 5:34:25 PM PDT by
randita
To: randita
When I use the term “swing states,” I am referring to those states that in a “neutral” landscape are likely to be the closest and could well swing to one party or the other. Thanks for explaining that. I always thought it meant states where lots of wife swapping goes on.
3 posted on
06/19/2012 5:37:38 PM PDT by
Homer_J_Simpson
("Every nation has the government that it deserves." - Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821))
To: randita
I can’t poke holes in Rothenberg’s analysis at this stage of the game.
The holes big enough to drive a truck through!?
If anyone here thinks that Obama is taking Florida, a state with total GOP control & hard hit by obamian policies including the devastation of the Space Program, well I really do have swamp land to sell you.
7 posted on
06/19/2012 6:44:55 PM PDT by
bill1952
(Choice is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
To: randita
8 posted on
06/19/2012 6:53:44 PM PDT by
indthkr
To: randita
Rothenberg is a lib but this is a very fair analysis. The wild card, of course, is the economy. If it continues to tank, I can’t imagine Obama being re-elected even with vote fraud factored in. However, if it bounces back in the fall, I think he’ll hold on and we’ll be screwed.
12 posted on
06/19/2012 9:00:31 PM PDT by
OrangeHoof
(Our economy won't heal until one particular black man is unemployed.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson