Posted on 06/14/2012 10:01:13 PM PDT by Perseverando
There are NO TWO DIFFERENT MODELS.
There is only ONE MODEL. I have no idea if Snopes got her name right, or if they actually gave her a name. I don’t visit Snopes and don’t plan to. If I ever used that name, it’s because it’s in common usage. Bite me.
She’s A MODEL. She posed for exotic images. I located her years ago on a website I have provided the name of too many times to count. THE MODEL had a long career, some of the images show her when she was young, some, when she was older, in some, she’s wearing more lipstick than others. SHE’S ALWAYS THE SAME GIRL. Wearing the same style of earrings which are her signature.
There is absolutely no connection between THE MODEL and Stanley Ann Dunham or Frank Marshall Davis.
Do I have to continue to repeat myself? Who will get sick of this first, you or I? Or are you trying to pee off the Moderators so that they pull this post/thread like so many others?
ONE MODEL. ONE GIRL. BOTH IN THE SAME COMPOSITE IMAGE. ONE TINTED, ONE BLACK AND WHITE. SAME GIRL. SAME MODEL.
You never know who you are ‘talking’ to on these threads, sometimes I wonder if we aren’t having discussions with the perps themselves.
It sounds like you have not read the article, "Was communist mentor intimate with Obama's mother?", which is the topic of this thread.
Why would you comment on a thread the topic of which you are wholly ignorant of?
still has nothing to do with who the woman was.>/I>
What has to do with the woman was is who the woman was, which was and is Stanley Anne Dunham.
what evidence do you have that SAD is the mother of the man in the White House
She raised him for ten years, he looks like her, and she was naked in his father's house eight months before he was born.
What evidence do you have it was anyone else?
Ive never seen any, and Ive read threads about his background since summer 2008, as many threads as I saw and could find.
Did you read those threads as poorly as you read this one -- i.e., not reading the article at hand at all? That might explain your continuing confusion.
There is absolutely no connection between THE MODEL and Stanley Ann Dunham or Frank Marshall Davis.
There is no connection between the model Marcy Moore and those two as far as we know -- correct.
Now, as to the other model you posted pictures of, Stanley Anne Dunham -- she is connected to F M Davis because she is modeling herself on Frank M Davis' furniture in F M Davis' house, as proven in the article this thread is discussing.
Hope this helps.
But also a felon.
and here's a composite of Stanley Ann Dunham compared to THE MODEL:
so now you tell me who these two girls are?
...You posted two images of Marcy Moore and two images of Stanley Ann Dunham two different models.
THERE ARE NO TWO DIFFERENT MODELS. THERE IS ONLY ONE MODEL. SHE POSED FOR MANY YEARS IN A VARIETY OF MAGAZINES. SHE GOT HEAVIER AND OLDER. HER BOOBS GOT A LITTLE BIGGER. SHE USED MORE MAKE-UP. BUT SHE WAS THE SAME GIRL.
...and no, I'm not shouting, I'm typing in capital letters so you don't miss it.
The article is replete with false “information”.
And your comments follow suit.
You have no evidence, merely baseless assertions.
The "black and white" images are the professional model Marcy Moore. The "tinted" images are the amateur model Stanley Anne Dunham. The idea that these two people are the same person is strictly leftist snopes disinformation. One would have to be a moron to fall for that.
Those are all Stanley Anne Dunham, as is obvious. Nice job.
Another nice side-by-side showing pictures of Stanley Anne Dunham from two angles.
This is a statement for which you have no evidence, merely baseless assertions. Heck, as documented above, you apparently haven't even read the article.
ok, you’ve convinced me, you qualify for the blind-as-a-bat award or the wilfully stupid - maybe both. Either way I’m losing interest. You bore me.
You have an interesting posting history. The second page of your comments takes one to January 2011. And perusal of a few pp shows you were beating the FMD is the father drum even then, and just as nasty and arrogant as you are now.
You have an agenda, and it is to obfuscate and create a meme that FMD is the father. You know the reason, and others can guess pretty easily.
I never said Obama resembles Frank Marshall Davis. In fact, I said he doesn't look like him at all. As for Obama resembling Stanley Ann's father, he does if you compare typical pictures of Obama. Not like those you posted with unusual facial expressions.
I personally don’t give a rat’s you-know-what who the commie SOB’s father was.
Yes, and anyone with half a brain who was paying attention had figured out that Frank was Barry’s dreaming father back in 2008. What’s your point?
I’m like you, I really don’t give a hoot who his father was, and please don’t think my comments are always directed entirely or solely at you, what I am trying to make clear is, if there are going to be comparisons, they should be made with a large number of images chosen at random.
And that’s what I did. I chose a number of images of zero at random to place in line with the only images of Stanley Armour Dunham that are not of him as an old man.
The performer formerly known as Barry Soetero is certainly not a son of Frank Marshall Davis, although he was mentored by the avowed Communist and sexual deviate from ages nine through eighteen.The woman in the sepia cheesecake is not Stanley Ann Dunham just from the nose--SAD's could crack nuts; Sepia Cheese's is a Bob Hope ski slope.
Neither does Boy King resemble alleged father Hussein I.
The winner of the resemblance award thus far is Malcolm Little, but DNA or other proofs are lacking.
Our 44th president continues to present as described by Holmes to Watson in The Adventure of the Three Garridebs, "Touch him where we will he is false."
As Charles Laughton berates Marlene Dietrich in Witness for the Prosecution, "Are you lying now, were you lying then or are you not a chronic and habitual liar!"
At least he had a girlfriend--see how swollen she makes his head.
"The good, the bad, and the ugly."
Yep. I read from #201 to the (current) end of the thread. Lots of good (and some fairly vicious) back-and-forth. For those interested, there is another related thread that had some interesting points also.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.