Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: uncbob
What BS

Master politician that lost congress for the dems in 94--does nothing but campaign for losing democrat politicians--couldn't prevent the Obamites from STEALING the nomination from Hillary in 2008

If it wasn't for the MSM the Clintons and Gore would be in jail

Amen Brother! That was exactly my thinking. Bill Clinton was a HORRIBLE politician. He was only defaulted the first time because of the interference of Ross Perot, and the down right Nasty connivance of the national media.

In 1994 his name was mud, and the avalanche of Republican Congressmen elected was a direct result of his political stupidity. He was shell shocked and whipped like a little dog, and the *ONLY* reason he was able to rally was because Timothy McVeigh blew up the Federal Building, and the Media leaped into action implying it was the fault of Clinton's opponents. They then hatefully maligned everything the Republican Congress (and especially Newt) Tried to do.

Bill Clinton was not masterful, he was simply on the same side as everyone who broadcasts news and entertainment, and as they controlled access to what the public was allowed to hear, nothing but the best light came through for Clinton, and nothing but hate filled venom came through for his opponents.

The media people are the enemy of this nation. They need to be wiped out financially. They need to be put into a position such that they can no longer tamper with the election process. They are the threat, and they need to be steamrolled. Bill Clinton was just a putz they liked.

32 posted on 06/11/2012 5:58:17 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

“The media people are the enemy of this nation. They need to be wiped out financially. They need to be put into a position such that they can no longer tamper with the election process. They are the threat, and they need to be steamrolled.”

This cannot be repeated loud enough or often enough.


42 posted on 06/11/2012 6:20:54 AM PDT by Awgie (truth is always stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp; uncbob

If I remember the percentages of the 2 presidential elections Clinton won, it was this :

1992:

Clinton 43.0% (Electoral vote : 370)
Bush 37.5% (Electoral vote: 168)
Perot 18.9% (Most of these were disillusioned Republicans)

1996:

Clinton 49%
Dole 41%
Perot 8.5%
Others 1.5%

In NEITHER of these two elections did Clinton even get 50% of the vote.


45 posted on 06/11/2012 6:38:35 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (bOTRT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp
"Bill Clinton was not masterful, he was simply on the same side as everyone who broadcasts news and entertainment,"

Bill WAS and IS 'news and entertainment.'

58 posted on 06/11/2012 7:28:48 AM PDT by I am Richard Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp
"Bill Clinton was not masterful, he was simply on the same side as everyone who broadcasts news and entertainment,"

Bill WAS and IS 'news and entertainment.'

59 posted on 06/11/2012 7:29:12 AM PDT by I am Richard Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson